Case law

Brown Shoe Co. v. Commissioner

10 T.C. 291 · United States Tax Court · Feb 13, 1948

Brown v. United States

43 Fed. Cl. 463 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 26, 1999

See Brown v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 290 (1996). In a status report filed with the court, the parties indicated that they were pursuing settlement of Count I, the remaining Count at issue. … See Brown v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. at 292-95 . These facts are equally pertinent to the defendant’s instant motion for summary judgment for Count I of the complaint, and need not be repeated here.

McCormick v. Gober

14 Vet. App. 39 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 18, 2000

Hermogenes v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 75, 78 (1996) (citing Fed. Election Comm'n v. … Dippel v. West, 12 Vet.App. 466 (1999) (quoting Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994)); Allen v.

Ruffin v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 12 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 6, 2002

Brown, 7 Vet.App. 298, 300 (1994) (there exists presumption that appellant was notified of BVA decision and that presumption can be overcome only by "'clear evidence to the contrary'" (quoting Ashley v. … R. at 57; see Schoolman v. West, 12 Vet.App. 307, 310 (1999) (Board is finder of fact for determining whether presumption of regularity has been rebutted).

Brown v. United States

32 Ct. Cl. 432 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1897

While adhering to the interpretation of the treaty as given in the opinion in the Brown Case, the court must regard it as inoperative for the reasous hereinbefore set forth.

Brown v. District of Columbia

17 Ct. Cl. 402 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1881

(Kelly v. Solari, 6 M. &. W., 53; R. R. Co., v. Faunce, 6 Gill, 68 ; Johnson v. Rutherford, 10 Pa., 455 ; Law *421 rence v. The Bank, 54 N. Y., 432 ; Stewart v. Sears, 119 Mass., 143 ; Story on Contracts, § 541.) … (Brashears v. West, 7 Pet., 616 ; Maugles v. Dixon, 3 House of Lords’ Cases, 731; Mosteller v. Bost, 7 Iredell, 39; Faul v. Tinsman, 36 Penn., 108 ; Timms v.

Brown v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 578 · United States Customs Court · May 22, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

Brown v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 607 · United States Customs Court · Jun 18, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

Brown v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 608 · United States Customs Court · Jun 18, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not- specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

Brown v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 315 · United States Customs Court · Jun 27, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

Brown v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 315 · United States Customs Court · Jun 27, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

United States v. Brown

41 Cust. Ct. 434 · United States Customs Court · Dec 3, 1958

Solid State Design Incorporated

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 3, 2018

See Bond v. … Cir. 1993) (composite marks containing the identical words RIGHT-A-WAY were 5 The Board may take judicial notice of dictionary definitions, Univ. of Notre Dame du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imp.

Brown & Ives v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 936 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 20, 1925

This Board has no power to equalize or reduce taxes and must determine cases in accordance with the statute. Congress alone can remedy the situation to which the taxpayers object.

Brown v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 493 · United States Customs Court · Apr 30, 1957

Brown v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 576 · United States Customs Court · May 22, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

Brown v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 576 · United States Customs Court · May 22, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

Brown v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 607 · United States Customs Court · Jun 18, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

Brown v. United States

196 Ct. Cl. 808 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 1, 1971

Brown v. United States

3 Ct. Cl. 119 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1867

Brown.