Case law

GIBSON

16 I. & N. Dec. 58 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1976

record in cases under his jurisdiction which come before the Board. … See Yeang Ying Ch,eung v. INS, 422 F.2d 43 (3 Cir. 1970). We conclude that the immi- gration judge's reliance upon our decisions in Matter of Sangster, supra, and Matter of LTy, .supra, was correct.

Hodakievic v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 499 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 29, 1984

To prevail, plaintiff must show by cogent and clearly convincing evidence that the board’s decision was arbitrary, capricious or unlawful. Horn v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 667, 668 , 650 F.2d 286 (1980); Sanders v. … Horn v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 18, 24 , 671 F.2d 1328, 1332 (1982). Plaintiff also argues the correction board improperly acted as a “super selection board.”

Gulf Refining Co. v. United States

58 Ct. Cl. 559 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 29, 1923

S. 81 ; Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries Co., 251 U. S. 146,156 . The same rules are applicable in the ascertainment of values of property taken during a war as are applicable for property taken during times of peace. … The Shipping Board rates were accepted for the vessels used in the owner’s service.

Duerr v. Potts

90 F.2d 117 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 29, 1937

Appellee did not file an appeal to this court from the decision of the Board of Appeals holding that he could not make counts 1 and 2. Appellants appealed from the board’s decisión as to counts 5, 6, and 7 only. … (Patents) 827, 45 F. (2) 916, and cases cited; Herthel and Tifft v. Dubbs, 20 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1128, 65 F. (2d) 188; Angell v. Morin, 21 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1018, 69 F. (2d) 646; Josleyn v. Hulse, C. D. 1908, 34.

Protest 116113-K of Fendrich

18 Cust. Ct. 200 · United States Customs Court · May 20, 1947

Don’t forget that when tobacco matures and ripens, it gets brown. Q. Was it a dark brown or a light brown? — A. Filler tobacco. Q. Was it a dark brown or a light brown? — A. Dark. Q. Dark brown? — A. … Valle y Ca et al. v. United States, 47 Treas. Dec. 651 , T. D. 40912, argues that such examination has not sufficient probative value to prevail over the examination made by the Government examiner.

TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V. v. Jeffrey E. Martin

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 7, 2018

Corp. v. … Inc. v.

Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. United States

53 Fed. Cl. 690 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 5, 2002

In Castle, et al. v. … In Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v.

Wunderlich v. United States

117 Ct. Cl. 92 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1950

Cls. 1, 33 ; Callahan Construction Co. v. United States, 91 C. Cls. 538, 616-617 ; Ruff v. United States, 96 C. Cls. 148, 165 ; B-W Construction Company v. United States, 97 C. Cls. 92, 118-119 ; John McShain, Inc. v. … See our decision of today in McWilliams Dredging Co. v. United States, No. 48894, for an explanation of why such a decision of the Board does not foreclose the contractor from litigating the question in a court.

TOMAS

19 I. & N. Dec. 464 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1987

See Tejeda-Mata v. INS, 626 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir. 1980) (dictum), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 (1982); Niarchos v. INS, 393 F.2d 509 (7th Cir. 1968) (dictum); Gonzales v. Zurbrick, 45 F.2d 934 (6th Cir. 1930). … The request for oral argument before the Board is denied as moot.

Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States

429 F. Supp. 2d 1338 · United States Court of International Trade · Apr 24, 2006

United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987); see also Rust v. … See Block v. N. Dak., 461 U.S. at 292 (citing Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 (1980); Soriano v. United States, 352 U.S. 270 (1957)).

E-F-H-L

26 I. & N. Dec. 319 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2018

Cruz, Esquire, Dallas, Texas BEFORE: Board Panel: GREER and WENDTLAND, Board Members; DONOVAN, Temporary Board Member. … See generally Litvinov v. Holder, 605 F.3d 548, 555−56 (8th Cir. 2010); Hoxha v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 210, 214, 217−18 (1st Cir. 2006); Arulampalam v.

Burton v. United States

22 Cl. Ct. 706 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 27, 1991

Japanese War Notes Claimants Ass’n v. … Release from active duty without physical examination board review is insufficient, in and of itself, to commence the limitations period. Id., citing Friedman v.

Beggy v. Commissioner

23 T.C. 736 · United States Tax Court · Jan 27, 1955

The payment was authorized at a meeting of the board of directors held' January 17, 1950. … Willkie v. Commissioner, 127 F. 2d 953 , certiorari denied 317 U. S. 659 ; Carragan v. Commissioner, 197 F. 2d 246 ; Poorman v. Commissioner, 131 F. 2d 946, 949 ; Nickelsburg v. Commissioner, 154 F. 2d 70, 71 .

14-01 575

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 11, 2015

Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163, 1166-67 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 505 (1995). … Manlincon v. West, 12 Vet. App. 238, 240-41 (1999); see also Godfrey v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 398, 408-10 (1995); Archbold v. Brown, 9. 124, 130 (1996).

Wholesale Coal Co. v. Commissioner

16 B.T.A. 550 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 14, 1929

Gamble, Cleric, United, States Board of Taw Appeals, Washington, D. C. Re: Wholesale Coal Company, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. Docket No. 24532. … Coal Company, Docket No. 4515, decided by the Board on January 26, 1926.

General Commercial Co. v. United States

11 Ct. Cust. 473 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 17, 1923

D. 32091), Harris v. United States ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 5 ; T. D. 32286), Horace Day Co. v. United States ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 152 ; T. D. 32456), United States v. Johnson Co. ( 9 Ct. Cust. Appls. 258 ; T. D. 38215). … The judgment .of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Margolis v. Banner

599 F.2d 435 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 31, 1979

. § 102 (g), to the Board of Appeals. … See Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass’n, supra; Maryland v.

Rowan Cotton Mills Co. v. Commissioner

1 T.C. 865 · United States Tax Court · Apr 6, 1943

It was not until after the Supreme Court in January 1936, held in Butler v. United States, 297 U. … In Steinhagen Rice Milling Co. v. Scofield (C. C. A., 5th Cir.), 87 Fed. (2d) 804; certiorari denied, 300 U.

BECKFORD

22 I. & N. Dec. 1216 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2000

Dissenting Opinions: SCHMIDT, Chairman; joined by VACCA, Board Member; ROSENBERG, Board Member. … See Henderson v.

Presentation Products, Inc. dba Spinitar

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 12, 2017

In Robertson & Penn, Inc., ASBCA No. 55622, 08-2 BCA ~ 33,921 at 167,859 (citing Hunt Construction Corp. v. United States, 281 F .3d 1369, 13 72-73 (Fed. … rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.