Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.87s
1 Ct. Cust. 109 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1910
Wanamaker v. Cooper (69 Fed. Rep., 465; Thanhauser v. United States (159 Fed. Rep., 228). … United States v. Strauss (136 Fed. Rep., 185-187), reversing United States v. Strauss (128 Fed. Rep., 473); United States v. Cattus (167 Fed. Rep., 532); Thanhauser v. United States (159 Fed. Rep., 228-232).
Cited 44 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · May 29, 2015
Id.; see also Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995) aff'd, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) [(table)]. … § 1113(b); Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1042 (Fed. Cir. 1994).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished687 F.2d 464 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 2, 1982
Weil v. Fritz, 601 F.2d 551 , 202 USPQ 447 (CCPA 1979). … With respect to evidence reviewable by the board, in Stoudt v. Guggenheim, 651 F.2d 760 , 764 n.8, 210 USPQ 359 , 364 n.10 (Cust.
Cited 1 timesPublished76 F.2d 602 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 29, 1935
(Patents) 1046; and General Electric Co. v. De Forest Radio Co. (C. C. … We find no error in the decision of the Board of Appeals, and the same is affirmed. Affirmed.
Cited 3 timesPublished326 F.2d 996 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1964
The result of the approved decision of the Correction Board was merely to change the character and not the fact o,f discharge. Goldstein v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 228 , 130 F. … Peterson v. United States, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States v. Woodward-Newhouse Co.
11 Ct. Cust. 284 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 10, 1922
For convenient reference, we again cite authorities referred to in the case of United States v. Kuttroff, supra: Marriott v. Brune ( 9 How. 50 U. S. 619); Saxonville Mills v. Russell ( 116 U. … The judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.
Cited 19 timesPublished214 Ct. Cl. 731 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 25, 1977
United States v. Brown , Civ. No. 146-73C2. The trial judge granted the stay on July 7, 1977. "It is unclear why plaintiff requests the stay of proceedings to be vacated at this time. … Brown v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 768 , 524 F.2d 693 (1975). The contracts are listed in footnote 15 of the court’s opinion.
Cited 1 timesPublished131 Ct. Cl. 326 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955
Ketchum v. St. Louis, 101 U. S. 306 ; Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654 ; United States v. Butterworth-Judson Corp., 267 U. S. 387 . … Duell v. Brewer, supra. Ohio and Pennsylvania, on the other hand, do have such an action. Iddings v. Whitacre, 1 Ohio App. 223 ; Mott v. *341 Danforth, 6 Watts 304 ; Penrod v. Mitchell, 8 Sarg. & R. 522.
Cited 6 timesPublished3 Ct. Cust. 198 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 22, 1912
As we stated in substance in United States v. Shallus ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 332 ; T. … It is claimed by the Government that from the date of the enactment of this law until the decision of the Supreme Court in Lawder v. Stone ( 187 U.
Cited 4 timesPublishedConsolidated Cigar Corp. v. M. Landaw Ltd.
474 F.2d 1402 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 29, 1973
This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 167 USPQ 372 (1970), involving the application of M. … See Mead Johnson & Co. v. American Home Products Corp., 461 F.2d 1381 , 59 CCPA 1082 (1972).
Cited 2 timesPublishedAdamson Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Peavey Electronics Corporation
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Nov 1, 2023
to the Board as protected. … The Board may disregard the designation as ‘confidential’ for those matters which are improperly designated….”). … Person’s v. Christman, 9 USPQ2d 1477, 1480 (TTAB 1988). The Federal Circuit opinion affirmed the Board’s decision in Person’s, and cited Wallpaper Mfrs. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2017
Citing McCulloch v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 09-293V, 2015 WL 5634323 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … June 30, 2016) (reducing overall fee award by ten percent due to excessive and duplicative billing); Ericzon v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 10-103V, 2016 WL 447770 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 15, 2016); Sexton v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRichardson Camera Co. v. United States
467 F.2d 491 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 13, 1972
Moran Bros. v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 245, 251 , 346 F. 2d 590, 593 (1965). In Anthony Grace & Sons v. United States, 170 Ct. … In United States v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedAuthority of the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board to Delegate Power
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Apr 19, 2002
CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD You have asked whether the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (“Board”) may delegate executive … Rose V, Chairperson, United States Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, from Larry L. Simms, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel at 2 (Sept. 17, 1981)).
Cited 0 timesPublished16 I. & N. Dec. 690 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1979
See Rogers v. Cheng F n Sheng, 280 F.2d 663 (D.C. Cir. 1960), cert. denied 364 U.S. 891 (1960); United States ex rel. Tom Man v. Murff, , 264 F.2d 926 (2 Cir. 1959); Chi Sheng Liu v. Holton, 297 F.2d 740 (9 Cir. 1961). … The Service points out that as late as 1975, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reaffirmed the position reached by the Board in S Y--L--. Cheng v.
Cited 1 timesPublished2 Vet. App. 315 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 27, 1992
Green v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 121, 124 (1991); see Wilson v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 16, 21 (1991); Parker v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 522, 526 (1991); Moore v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 401, 405 (1991); EF v. … See Fletcher v.
Cited 2 timesPublished59 T.C. 178 · United States Tax Court · Oct 26, 1972
See Arlington Park Jockey Club v. … See First Mortgage Corp. v. Commissioner, 135 F.2d 121 (C.A. 3, 1943), affirming a Memorandum Opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014
Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 532, 538 (1993). … Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469-71 (1994). However, lay witnesses are not competent to provide a medical diagnosis. See Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303 (2007).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished166 Ct. Cl. 527 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1964
Myers v. Bethlehem, Corporation, 303 U.S. 41 , 50-51 (1938); United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730, 735-737 (1944); United States v. Holpuch Co., 328 U.S. 234, 239-240 (1946). … United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U.S. 1, 14-15 (1926); Slavitt v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 606, 613 (1961), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 938 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 26, 2021
Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 446 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310. As noted above, the AOJ found that the Veteran has been diagnosed with hypertension. The Board also notes that the Veteran is service connected for diabetes. … Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 446 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(b). Once VA undertakes the effort to provide an examination when developing a claim, the examination must be an adequate one. See Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna