Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.87s

  • Illfelder v. United States

    1 Ct. Cust. 109 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1910

    Wanamaker v. Cooper (69 Fed. Rep., 465; Thanhauser v. United States (159 Fed. Rep., 228). … United States v. Strauss (136 Fed. Rep., 185-187), reversing United States v. Strauss (128 Fed. Rep., 473); United States v. Cattus (167 Fed. Rep., 532); Thanhauser v. United States (159 Fed. Rep., 228-232).

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • 12-18 672

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 29, 2015

    Id.; see also Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995) aff'd, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) [(table)]. … § 1113(b); Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1042 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Hester v. Allgeier

    687 F.2d 464 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Sep 2, 1982

    Weil v. Fritz, 601 F.2d 551 , 202 USPQ 447 (CCPA 1979). … With respect to evidence reviewable by the board, in Stoudt v. Guggenheim, 651 F.2d 760 , 764 n.8, 210 USPQ 359 , 364 n.10 (Cust.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Ridgway

    76 F.2d 602 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 29, 1935

    (Patents) 1046; and General Electric Co. v. De Forest Radio Co. (C. C. … We find no error in the decision of the Board of Appeals, and the same is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Unger v. United States

    326 F.2d 996 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1964

    The result of the approved decision of the Correction Board was merely to change the character and not the fact o,f discharge. Goldstein v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 228 , 130 F. … Peterson v. United States, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Woodward-Newhouse Co.

    11 Ct. Cust. 284 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 10, 1922

    For convenient reference, we again cite authorities referred to in the case of United States v. Kuttroff, supra: Marriott v. Brune ( 9 How. 50 U. S. 619); Saxonville Mills v. Russell ( 116 U. … The judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Brown

    214 Ct. Cl. 731 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 25, 1977

    United States v. Brown , Civ. No. 146-73C2. The trial judge granted the stay on July 7, 1977. "It is unclear why plaintiff requests the stay of proceedings to be vacated at this time. … Brown v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 768 , 524 F.2d 693 (1975). The contracts are listed in footnote 15 of the court’s opinion.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hadden v. United States

    131 Ct. Cl. 326 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955

    Ketchum v. St. Louis, 101 U. S. 306 ; Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654 ; United States v. Butterworth-Judson Corp., 267 U. S. 387 . … Duell v. Brewer, supra. Ohio and Pennsylvania, on the other hand, do have such an action. Iddings v. Whitacre, 1 Ohio App. 223 ; Mott v. *341 Danforth, 6 Watts 304 ; Penrod v. Mitchell, 8 Sarg. & R. 522.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Vandegrift v. United States

    3 Ct. Cust. 198 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 22, 1912

    As we stated in substance in United States v. Shallus ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 332 ; T. … It is claimed by the Government that from the date of the enactment of this law until the decision of the Supreme Court in Lawder v. Stone ( 187 U.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. M. Landaw Ltd.

    474 F.2d 1402 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 29, 1973

    This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 167 USPQ 372 (1970), involving the application of M. … See Mead Johnson & Co. v. American Home Products Corp., 461 F.2d 1381 , 59 CCPA 1082 (1972).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Adamson Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Peavey Electronics Corporation

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Nov 1, 2023

    to the Board as protected. … The Board may disregard the designation as ‘confidential’ for those matters which are improperly designated….”). … Person’s v. Christman, 9 USPQ2d 1477, 1480 (TTAB 1988). The Federal Circuit opinion affirmed the Board’s decision in Person’s, and cited Wallpaper Mfrs. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2017

    Citing McCulloch v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 09-293V, 2015 WL 5634323 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … June 30, 2016) (reducing overall fee award by ten percent due to excessive and duplicative billing); Ericzon v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 10-103V, 2016 WL 447770 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 15, 2016); Sexton v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Richardson Camera Co. v. United States

    467 F.2d 491 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 13, 1972

    Moran Bros. v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 245, 251 , 346 F. 2d 590, 593 (1965). In Anthony Grace & Sons v. United States, 170 Ct. … In United States v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Authority of the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board to Delegate Power

    Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · Apr 19, 2002

    CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD You have asked whether the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (“Board”) may delegate executive … Rose V, Chairperson, United States Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, from Larry L. Simms, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel at 2 (Sept. 17, 1981)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • CHEUNG>

    16 I. & N. Dec. 690 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1979

    See Rogers v. Cheng F n Sheng, 280 F.2d 663 (D.C. Cir. 1960), cert. denied 364 U.S. 891 (1960); United States ex rel. Tom Man v. Murff, , 264 F.2d 926 (2 Cir. 1959); Chi Sheng Liu v. Holton, 297 F.2d 740 (9 Cir. 1961). … The Service points out that as late as 1975, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reaffirmed the position reached by the Board in S Y--L--. Cheng v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Derwinski

    2 Vet. App. 315 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 27, 1992

    Green v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 121, 124 (1991); see Wilson v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 16, 21 (1991); Parker v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 522, 526 (1991); Moore v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 401, 405 (1991); EF v. … See Fletcher v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kaplan v. Commissioner

    59 T.C. 178 · United States Tax Court · Oct 26, 1972

    See Arlington Park Jockey Club v. … See First Mortgage Corp. v. Commissioner, 135 F.2d 121 (C.A. 3, 1943), affirming a Memorandum Opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • 09-03 650

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

    Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 532, 538 (1993). … Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469-71 (1994). However, lay witnesses are not competent to provide a medical diagnosis. See Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303 (2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • George v. United States

    166 Ct. Cl. 527 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1964

    Myers v. Bethlehem, Corporation, 303 U.S. 41 , 50-51 (1938); United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730, 735-737 (1944); United States v. Holpuch Co., 328 U.S. 234, 239-240 (1946). … United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U.S. 1, 14-15 (1926); Slavitt v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 606, 613 (1961), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 938 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • 210109-129240

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 26, 2021

    Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 446 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310. As noted above, the AOJ found that the Veteran has been diagnosed with hypertension. The Board also notes that the Veteran is service connected for diabetes. … Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 446 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(b). Once VA undertakes the effort to provide an examination when developing a claim, the examination must be an adequate one. See Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.