Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

4.61s

  • Stone v. Commissioner

    32 T.C. 1021 · United States Tax Court · Jul 31, 1959

    Helvering v. Winmill, 305 U.S. 79, 83 . … Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. Co., 247 U.S. 179 . And this is even more true where the entries are made by parties, over whom the taxpayer has no control.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. United States

    163 F. Supp. 652 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1958

    Wales v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 765 ; Beamish v. United States, 130 C. Cls. 767 ; and Holliday v. United States, 128 C. Cls. 647 . … Furlong v. United States, 138 C. Cls. 843 (1957), and Rosnick v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 1 (1955). There is, however, nothing that would lead us to such a *130 conclusion.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barbara Kinnard v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 30, 2024

    Brown v. Office of Personnel Management, 86 M.S.P.R. 417, ¶ 8 (2000). … Trinkl v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 727 F. App’x 1007, 1010 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Burlington Venetian Blind Co. v. United States

    1 Ct. Cust. 374 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 27, 1911

    The board, on appeal, overruled the protest and sustained the assessment. … Stern et al v. United States (105 Fed. Rep., 937); Hiller et al v. United States (106 Fed. Rep. 73).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • BELENZO

    17 I. & N. Dec. 374 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1981

    Maguire, and Farb, Board Members. … BEFORE THE BOARD May 19, 1981 Bv: Milhollan, Chairman; Maniatia, and Maguire, Board Members Following the Board's denial on.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • In re Allatt

    121 F.2d 545 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 3, 1941

    Appellant, proceeding under Patent Office rule 42, elected to prosecute the claims in group I, retaining those in group II for the purpose of appeal to the board. … The Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in the case of Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp., 303 U.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Derwinski

    2 Vet. App. 315 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 27, 1992

    Green v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 121, 124 (1991); see Wilson v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 16, 21 (1991); Parker v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 522, 526 (1991); Moore v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 401, 405 (1991); EF v. … See Fletcher v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stanley v. Commissioner

    81 T.C. 634 · United States Tax Court · Sep 26, 1983

    Brown v. Commissioner, 51 T.C. 116, 119 (1968), and cases cited therein. … Brown v. Commissioner, 51 T.C. at 119 . This must be determined under a uniform Federal standard. Stanley v. Commissioner, 45 T.C. 555, 562 (1966).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Oct 26, 2021

    Micro Motion Inc. v. Kane Steel Co., 894 F.2d 1318, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (citing Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 507 (1947)). … Sentis Grp., Inc. v. Shell Oil Co., 763 F.3d 919, 926 (8th Cir. 2014). In addition to relevance, discovery can be limited by proportionality.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mattor v. Coolegem

    530 F.2d 1391 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 18, 1976

    As we stated in Koval v. … See Land v. Regan, 342 F.2d 92 , 52 CCPA 1048, 144 U.S.P.Q. 661 (1965).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bielec v. United States

    456 F.2d 690 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1972

    Harris v. United States, 153 Ct. Cl. 425 (1961). … See Ganse v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 183, 186 , 376 F. 2d 900 (1967); Price v. United States, 112 Ct. Cl. 198, 200 , 80 F. Supp. 542, 543 (1948); Coleman, v. United States, 100 Ct. Cl. 41 (1943); Dvorkin v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • DeWitt v. United States

    204 Ct. Cl. 274 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1974

    II In Commissioner v. … Fox, supra; and Apt v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re Derleth

    118 F.2d 566 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 31, 1941

    Q. 284; Walker v. Coe, 24 U. S. P. Q. 51; Ex parte Rodgers, 26 U. S. P. … Q. 316 (all being decisions of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office), and upon the case of Walker v. Doe, 24 U. S. P. Q. 51, a decision of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tatelbaum ex rel. Creditors of A. Hoen & Co. v. United States

    33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,502 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 10, 1986

    The Board’s findings of fact are presumptively correct. Arundel Corp. v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 84, 99 , 515 F.2d 1116, 1124 (1975). … Plaintiff carries a heavy burden in seeking to set aside factual determinations made by a Board. Donald M. Drake Co. v. United States, 194 Ct.Cl. 549, 553 , 439 F.2d 169, 171 (1971).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Luster Products, Inc. v. John M. Van Zandt d/b/a Vanza USA

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Nov 28, 2012

    In Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates L.P., 507 U.S. 380 (1993), as discussed by the Board in Pumpkin, Ltd. v. … See Pumpkin, Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vander Hoek v. Commissioner

    51 T.C. 203 · United States Tax Court · Oct 29, 1968

    Wood County Telephone Co., supra; Nachman v. Commissioner, 191 F. 2d 934 (C.A. 5, 1951), affirming 12 T.C. 1204 (1949); Kimble v. Stuart, an unreported case (D. … Ariz. 1955, 48 A.F.T.R. 1919 , 55-2 U.S.T.C. par. 9764); V. P. Shufflebarger, 24 T.C. 980 (1955); see sec. 1.167(a)-3, Income Tax Regs; Rev. Rul. 65-228, 1965-2 C.B.43. One final note.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Langmuir

    62 F.2d 93 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 19, 1932

    C. 211, Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Kodel Electric & Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 55 F.(2d) 173 , and In re Marshall, 54 F.(2d) 421, 423 , 19 C. C. P. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Appeal of Stoddard

    3 B.T.A. 79 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 20, 1925

    Baltzell v. Mitchell, 3 Fed. (2d) 428; Appeal of Brown & Ives, Trustees, 2 B. T. A. 936.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • American Federal Bank, FSB v. United States

    58 Fed. Cl. 429 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 7, 2003

    Auld Co. v. … In La Van v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hawaiian Independent Refinery v. United States

    460 F. Supp. 1249 · United States Customs Court · Nov 6, 1978

    Such determinations by the Board are judicially reviewable at the request of the parties affected to determine their reasonableness and consonance with the purposes of the Act. See Armco Steel Corp. v. … [Armco Steel Corp. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.