Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.16s
Applied Devices Corp. v. United States
591 F.2d 635 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1979
Healy Co. v. United States, 216 Ct. Cl. 172 , 576 F.2d 299 (1978); C. H. Leavell & Co. v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 776 , 530 F.2d 878 (1976). … Co. v. United States, 179 Ct.
Cited 18 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2021
Id.; see, e.g., Reale v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 1010, 1013 (1976) (disavowing the idea of the court operating as “a sort of super Correction Board”); Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 782 (Fed. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublished25 I. & N. Dec. 140 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2009
FOR RESPONDENT: Pro se BEFORE: Board Panel: PAULEY, ADKINS-BLANCH, and GUENDELSBERGER, Board Members. … See Carlson v. Landon, 342 U.S. 524, 537-42 (1952). An Immigration Judge should only set a bond if he first determines that the alien does not present a danger to the community. See Matter of Guerra, 24 I&N Dec. at 38.
Cited 38 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 24, 2025
Kamaludin Slyman CSC, ASBCA No. 62006 et al., 21-1 BCA ¶ 37,849 at 183,793 (citing Dai Glob. v. Adm’r of the United States Agency for Int'l Dev., 945 F.3d 1196, 1198 (Fed. Cir. 2019)). … EHR Doctors, Inc. v. Soc. Sec.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLustbader Construction Co. v. United States
62 Ct. Cl. 549 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 1, 1926
not revise the decision of the board in this case. … The court has allowed the plaintiff the sum of $670.63 for the two items of power wiring and pump foundations and the amount of $1,679.83 above referred to in Finding V, a total of $2,350.46.
Cited 5 timesPublishedITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United States
524 F.2d 680 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1975
Corp. v. United States, 201 Ct. … Without such specific supported demonstration of factual Board error the Board’s statement of facts will be accepted. Jefferson Constr. Co. v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 581, 589 , 368 F. 2d 247, 252 (1966).
Cited 92 timesPublished496 F.2d 603 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 9, 1974
The recent case of Knapp v. … See Blicke v. Treves, supra.
Cited 6 timesPublished2 Vet. App. 241 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 12, 1992
See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990). I. … In evaluating the evidence for and against the claim, the Board must conduct its review mindful of the statutory presumption in the veteran’s favor. Cf. Akins v.
Cited 7 timesPublished23 I. & N. Dec. 548 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2003
Caldbeck, Assistant District Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: GUENDELSBERGER, BRENNAN, and PAULEY, Board Members. … Matter of Longstaff, supra, at 1441; see also Monet v. INS, supra, at 753. To our knowledge, no federal appellate authority or any subsequent Board precedent has held to the contrary.
Cited 80 timesPublishedTeresa L. Ruckman v. Department of the Navy
Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 18, 2025
See Clemens v. … Brown v. Department of the Interior, 121 M.S.P.R. 205, ¶ 18 (2014), overruled on other grounds by Haas, 2022 MSPB 36; see Douglas v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished134 F.2d 630 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 1, 1943
Appellants contend that the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in the case of Becket v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents, 69 App.D.C. 51 , 98 F.2d 332 , supports their position. … For the reasons stated herein the decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.
Cited 8 timesPublished10 Cl. Ct. 579 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 13, 1986
The Board’s Decision This court may overturn a decision of the Board when it is unsupported by substantial evidence or when there is noncompliance with applicable laws and regulations. Jordan v. … In arriving at its decision, the Board concluded that plaintiff had failed to present sufficient evidence to prove her case. The Board distinguished Barber v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCentury Country Club v. United States
116 F. Supp. 727 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1953
Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U. S. 103, 110 . … Garden City Golf Club v. Corwin, 62 F. 2d 246 (Circuit Court of Appeals (2d) 1932) ; Fresh Meadow Country Club v. United States, 17 F. Supp. 400 (District Court, Eastern District New York (1936)); Pendennis v.
Cited 3 timesPublished358 F.2d 965 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965
Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964), and Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964). Stone v. United States, 160 Ct. … Accord: Grubin v. United States, 166 Ct. Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964); Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964).
Cited 14 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2016
See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994). The Board finds the Veteran's statements and April 2015 testimony regarding the continuity of his back pain since service to be credible. … See AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38 (1993) (a claim for an increased evaluation remains viable on appeal when an increase to less than the maximum evaluation is made during the pendency of an appeal).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished28 I. & N. Dec. 425 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2022
See Yates v. … Chery v.
Vacated in part by La Parra De Leon v. Garland, 52 F.4th 514 (2022)Cited 11 timesPublishedArt Center School v. United States
142 F. Supp. 916 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956
Hemphill Schools, Inc. v. … As was stated in Thomas v.
Cited 14 timesPublished15 Ct. Cust. 156 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 19, 1927
Appls. 182 , United States v. International Forwarding Co., 13 Ct. Cust. … The board held that there was no presumption of correctness in the collector’s finding, for the reason that witnesses testified in great numbers, and cited Morse v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 553 .
Cited 26 timesPublished23 T.C. 8 · United States Tax Court · Oct 8, 1954
In Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 279 U. … S. 716 , the Court was called on to consider the question of how to resolve possible conflicts that might arise in cases pending before the Board at the time of the enactment of the Eevenue Act of 1926 which the Board decided
Cited 19 timesPublished154 Ct. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961
Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 ; Culligan v. United States, 107 Ct. Cl. 222 , cert. denied, 330 U.S. 848 ; Bryan v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 541 . … Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 ; Misuraca v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 387 ; DeBusk v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 790 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 988 .
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna