Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

1.16s

  • Applied Devices Corp. v. United States

    591 F.2d 635 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1979

    Healy Co. v. United States, 216 Ct. Cl. 172 , 576 F.2d 299 (1978); C. H. Leavell & Co. v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 776 , 530 F.2d 878 (1976). … Co. v. United States, 179 Ct.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2021

    Id.; see, e.g., Reale v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 1010, 1013 (1976) (disavowing the idea of the court operating as “a sort of super Correction Board”); Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 782 (Fed. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • URENA

    25 I. & N. Dec. 140 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2009

    FOR RESPONDENT: Pro se BEFORE: Board Panel: PAULEY, ADKINS-BLANCH, and GUENDELSBERGER, Board Members. … See Carlson v. Landon, 342 U.S. 524, 537-42 (1952). An Immigration Judge should only set a bond if he first determines that the alien does not present a danger to the community. See Matter of Guerra, 24 I&N Dec. at 38.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • KiewitPhelps

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 24, 2025

    Kamaludin Slyman CSC, ASBCA No. 62006 et al., 21-1 BCA ¶ 37,849 at 183,793 (citing Dai Glob. v. Adm’r of the United States Agency for Int'l Dev., 945 F.3d 1196, 1198 (Fed. Cir. 2019)). … EHR Doctors, Inc. v. Soc. Sec.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lustbader Construction Co. v. United States

    62 Ct. Cl. 549 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 1, 1926

    not revise the decision of the board in this case. … The court has allowed the plaintiff the sum of $670.63 for the two items of power wiring and pump foundations and the amount of $1,679.83 above referred to in Finding V, a total of $2,350.46.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United States

    524 F.2d 680 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1975

    Corp. v. United States, 201 Ct. … Without such specific supported demonstration of factual Board error the Board’s statement of facts will be accepted. Jefferson Constr. Co. v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 581, 589 , 368 F. 2d 247, 252 (1966).

    Cited 92 timesPublished
  • Blicharz v. Hays

    496 F.2d 603 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 9, 1974

    The recent case of Knapp v. … See Blicke v. Treves, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Derwinski

    2 Vet. App. 241 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 12, 1992

    See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990). I. … In evaluating the evidence for and against the claim, the Board must conduct its review mindful of the statutory presumption in the veteran’s favor. Cf. Akins v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • KOLOAMATANGI

    23 I. & N. Dec. 548 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2003

    Caldbeck, Assistant District Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: GUENDELSBERGER, BRENNAN, and PAULEY, Board Members. … Matter of Longstaff, supra, at 1441; see also Monet v. INS, supra, at 753. To our knowledge, no federal appellate authority or any subsequent Board precedent has held to the contrary.

    Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Teresa L. Ruckman v. Department of the Navy

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 18, 2025

    See Clemens v. … Brown v. Department of the Interior, 121 M.S.P.R. 205, ¶ 18 (2014), overruled on other grounds by Haas, 2022 MSPB 36; see Douglas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In Re Cooper

    134 F.2d 630 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 1, 1943

    Appellants contend that the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in the case of Becket v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents, 69 App.D.C. 51 , 98 F.2d 332 , supports their position. … For the reasons stated herein the decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. United States

    10 Cl. Ct. 579 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 13, 1986

    The Board’s Decision This court may overturn a decision of the Board when it is unsupported by substantial evidence or when there is noncompliance with applicable laws and regulations. Jordan v. … In arriving at its decision, the Board concluded that plaintiff had failed to present sufficient evidence to prove her case. The Board distinguished Barber v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Century Country Club v. United States

    116 F. Supp. 727 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1953

    Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U. S. 103, 110 . … Garden City Golf Club v. Corwin, 62 F. 2d 246 (Circuit Court of Appeals (2d) 1932) ; Fresh Meadow Country Club v. United States, 17 F. Supp. 400 (District Court, Eastern District New York (1936)); Pendennis v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Farrar v. United States

    358 F.2d 965 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

    Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964), and Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964). Stone v. United States, 160 Ct. … Accord: Grubin v. United States, 166 Ct. Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964); Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • 13-21 312

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2016

    See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994). The Board finds the Veteran's statements and April 2015 testimony regarding the continuity of his back pain since service to be credible. … See AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38 (1993) (a claim for an increased evaluation remains viable on appeal when an increase to less than the maximum evaluation is made during the pendency of an appeal).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • LAPARRA

    28 I. & N. Dec. 425 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2022

    See Yates v. … Chery v.

    Vacated in part by La Parra De Leon v. Garland, 52 F.4th 514 (2022)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Art Center School v. United States

    142 F. Supp. 916 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

    Hemphill Schools, Inc. v. … As was stated in Thomas v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • United States v. Flory

    15 Ct. Cust. 156 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 19, 1927

    Appls. 182 , United States v. International Forwarding Co., 13 Ct. Cust. … The board held that there was no presumption of correctness in the collector’s finding, for the reason that witnesses testified in great numbers, and cited Morse v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 553 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Comas, Inc. v. Commissioner

    23 T.C. 8 · United States Tax Court · Oct 8, 1954

    In Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 279 U. … S. 716 , the Court was called on to consider the question of how to resolve possible conflicts that might arise in cases pending before the Board at the time of the enactment of the Eevenue Act of 1926 which the Board decided

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Hutton v. United States

    154 Ct. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

    Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 ; Culligan v. United States, 107 Ct. Cl. 222 , cert. denied, 330 U.S. 848 ; Bryan v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 541 . … Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 ; Misuraca v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 387 ; DeBusk v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 790 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 988 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.