Case law

Elchibegoff v. United States

123 Ct. Cl. 709 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952

After receiving notice of the Commission’s decision, the plaintiff appealed to the Commission’s Board of Appeals and Review and requested a hearing before that Board. … Blum v. United *712 States, 120 C. Cls. 232 ; Love v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 486 ; Wittner v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 231 .

Pratt v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 269 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 24, 1992

Just as in Goodman v. … The Court expects that the BVA will reexamine the evidence of record, seek any other evidence the Board feels is necessary, and issue a timely, well-supported decision in this case.” Fletcher v.

Dan D. Diamond v. The United States

427 F.2d 1246 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1970

Diamond v. … In Merson v.

Graham v. Commissioner

40 T.C. 14 · United States Tax Court · Apr 10, 1963

In Hochschild v. … Arrowsmith v. Commissioner, supra; United States v. Gilmore, supra; United States v. Patrick, supra.

ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United States

524 F.2d 680 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1975

Corp. v. United States, 201 Ct. … Without such specific supported demonstration of factual Board error the Board’s statement of facts will be accepted. Jefferson Constr. Co. v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 581, 589 , 368 F. 2d 247, 252 (1966).

FICALORA

11 I. & N. Dec. 592 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1966

: - The foregoing regulations have the force and effect of law (Di Mimi v. (1M, 96 F.2d 92). ' They are binding on all the parties here concerned. … The same is true' of his assertion that this Board should do so now.'

Hutton v. United States

154 Ct. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 ; Culligan v. United States, 107 Ct. Cl. 222 , cert. denied, 330 U.S. 848 ; Bryan v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 541 . … Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 ; Misuraca v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 387 ; DeBusk v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 790 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 988 .

In Re Cooper

134 F.2d 630 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 1, 1943

Appellants contend that the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in the case of Becket v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents, 69 App.D.C. 51 , 98 F.2d 332 , supports their position. … For the reasons stated herein the decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

Sherman v. Hope

161 F.2d 263 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 25, 1947

Mabon v. John Q. Sherman, Etc., Patent Appeal No. 5264, decided concurrently herewith. … One of the earlier patents referred,to in this quotation from the board’s opinion is contained in the record in the Mabon v. Sherman interference hereinbefore referred to.

Urs Energy & Construction, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 14, 2016

Prior to the entry of a final judgment by a court or a decision by an agency board, the court or agency board shall require a defective certification to be corrected.”); M. Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. … .”); Fisher v.

Farrar v. United States

358 F.2d 965 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964), and Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964). Stone v. United States, 160 Ct. … Accord: Grubin v. United States, 166 Ct. Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964); Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964).

Mark Freund v. Douglas A. Collins

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 19, 2026

of Veterans' Appeals (Board) to the class and adjust backpay for inflation and interest.13 Concerning the objection about an allocation of the Board's docket, while the parties might have negotiated for such a term when … Class members who have their appeals reactivated will assume a place on the Board's docket that reflects the date of their Substantive Appeal. Thereafter, the Board's normal rules for processing appeals will apply.

A.T.I. TACOSE S.C.a R.L.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jan 4, 2017

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). A material fact is one which may make a difference in the outcome of the case. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). … Hamm & Assocs., Inc. v. England, 379 F.3d 1334, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Robins Maint., Inc. v. United States, 265 F.3d 1254, 1257 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

13-21 312

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jan 29, 2016

See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 470 (1994). The Board finds the Veteran's statements and April 2015 testimony regarding the continuity of his back pain since service to be credible. … See AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 38 (1993) (a claim for an increased evaluation remains viable on appeal when an increase to less than the maximum evaluation is made during the pendency of an appeal).

Jamison v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 297 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1985

Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.Cl. 1 , 310 F.2d 381 (1962), cert. denied sub. nom. Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 , 83 S.Ct. 1540 , 10 L.Ed.2d 691 (1963); Skopic v. … United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 202, 203 (1967); Miller v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 871, 879 , 361 F.2d 245, 249 (1966); Caravella v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 280 (1985); Stone v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 250, 259 (1984).

Thomas v. United States

4 Ct. Cust. 51 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 21, 1913

This statute was construed by the Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Ferry & Co. v. … See United States v. Habicht ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 53 ; T. D. 31031) and cases cited; United States v. Shallus ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 332 ; T. D. 32074).

12-18 672

Board of Veterans' Appeals · May 29, 2015

Id.; see also Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995) aff'd, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) [(table)]. … § 1113(b); Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1042 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 23, 2022

Moran * v. … * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * Leah V. Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner; Kimberly S.

Vander Hoek v. Commissioner

51 T.C. 203 · United States Tax Court · Oct 29, 1968

Wood County Telephone Co., supra; Nachman v. Commissioner, 191 F. 2d 934 (C.A. 5, 1951), affirming 12 T.C. 1204 (1949); Kimble v. Stuart, an unreported case (D. … Ariz. 1955, 48 A.F.T.R. 1919 , 55-2 U.S.T.C. par. 9764); V. P. Shufflebarger, 24 T.C. 980 (1955); see sec. 1.167(a)-3, Income Tax Regs; Rev. Rul. 65-228, 1965-2 C.B.43. One final note.

Parker v. Commissioner

31 B.T.A. 644 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 21, 1934

E, Brown was employed by George *1057 D. … Brown and wife, Blanche G. Brown, and Catherine Barr, each owning a one-sixth interest. The George D.