Case law

Rathborne v. Commissioner

39 B.T.A. 56 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 10, 1939

On June 22, 1938, respondent filed with the Board a computation for entry of decision in accordance with the opinion of the Board. … United States v. Andrews, 302 U. S. 517 ; United States v. Garbutt Oil Co., 302 U. S. 528 .

Seltzer v. United States

98 Ct. Cl. 554 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1943

Parker v. United States, 1 Pet. 293, 297 , 7 L. Ed. 150 ; Wilcox v. Jack *559 son, 13 Pet. 498, 512 , 10 L. Ed. 264 ; Williams v. United States, 1 How. 290 , 11 L. Ed. 135 ; United States v. … The President, independent of the Board proceedings, had inherent power to discharge him, Blake v. United States, supra; Myers v.

Gellert v. Wanberg

495 F.2d 779 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 2, 1974

We note that even in the case of Chittick v. … As we earlier stated in Neufeld v.

Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Sep 1, 2015

Subsequent to the issuance of our 25 July 2014 decision, on 10 December 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Sikorsky Aircraft I Corporation v. … conformance with the Board's Charter.

Ramming v. Commissioner

6 B.T.A. 188 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 18, 1927

Ramming v. Commissioner Docket No. 5983. United States Board of Tax Appeals 6 B.T.A. 188 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3587 ; February 18, 1927 , Promulgated *3587 1. … The cases of Edwards v. Brown, Kircher v. Murray, and Merrell v. Moore, supra , are construed in Bek v. Miller, (App.

Application of Smyth

189 F.2d 982 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 5, 1951

“See also Thompson v. Dicke (No. 4269) 1940 C.D. 269 ; 517 O.G. 564 .” The examiner declared this action to be final and on March 5, 1949, the appeal to the Board of Appeals was taken. … In the interference case of Burt v.

Montecash LLC v. Anzar Enterprises, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · May 7, 2010

In Kellogg Co. v. … See also Tea Board of India v.

Furlong v. Commissioner

45 B.T.A. 362 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 14, 1941

The Barker and O'Neal cases must now be regarded as overruled by the later decision of the Supreme Court in North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet, 286 U. S. 417 . … Lucas v. American Code Co., supra.” See also Schramm v. United States, 36 Fed. Supp. 1021.

M-S-I

29 I. & N. Dec. 61 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Mar 27, 2025

Sanchez Amador v. Garland, 30 F.4th 529, 534 (5th Cir. 2022). … See Tamara-Gomez v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 343, 351 (5th Cir. 2006); see also Tabora Gutierrez v. Garland, 12 F.4th 496, 504 (5th Cir. 2021).

White & Co. v. United States

2 Ct. Cust. 327 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 22, 1911

MONTGOMERY, Presiding Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of General Appraisers, G. A. 7222 (T. … See United States v. Cerecedo ( 209 U. S., 337 ), and United States v. Falk ( 204 U. S., 143 ). The decision of the Board of General Appraisers, which sustained the action of the collector, is affirmed.

United States v. Schmidt

13 Ct. Cust. 252 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 21, 1925

United States v. … United States v. Beierle, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 457 ; United States v. Von Bremen et al., 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 407 .

Parker v. Commissioner

31 B.T.A. 644 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 21, 1934

E, Brown was employed by George *1057 D. … Brown and wife, Blanche G. Brown, and Catherine Barr, each owning a one-sixth interest. The George D.

MANGABAT

14 I. & N. Dec. 75 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1972

(1) The fact that a lower federal court has disagreed with a legal conclusion of the Board does not of itself require that the Board recede from that conclu- sion; the Board's jurisdiction is nationwide and the contrary … INS, 408 F.2d 1196 (1969); Lee Fook Chuey v. INS, 439 F.2d 244 (1971); United States v Os-Luna Picas, 443 F.2d 907 (1971); and Vitales v. - - INS, 443 F.2d 343 (1971).

Michael Kemp v. Department of the Army

Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 20, 2024

Brown v. U.S. … Sheehan v. Department of the Navy, 240 F.3d 1009, 1014 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

11-02 986

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

See also Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993) (holding that the threshold for normal hearing is from 0 to 20 decibels, and higher threshold levels indicate some degree of hearing loss). … See Crowe v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 238, 245 (1994); 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(b) (2014). See also Wagner v. Principi, 370 F.3d 1089, 1096 (Fed. Cir. 2004); 38 C.F.R. § 3.306 (2014).

Ford v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 30, 2026

To avoid the court improperly reviewing a BCNR decision de novo, it is “normally limited to the administrative record developed before the military board” when deciding whether to grant judgment. Bateson v. … To begin, Flute v. United States provides that “[t]he denial of a hearing before the [Board does] not per se deprive plaintiff of due process.” Id. (quoting Flute v. United States, 535 F.2d 624, 628 (Ct. Cl. 1976)).

J. A. Jones Construction Company v. The United States

390 F.2d 886 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1968

In addition, the parties stipulated before the ASBCA that the question of quantum was not before the Board, and the Board made no findings on the issue. … The Board’s second opinion reversed the first opinion on this point. 9 . See Natus Corp. v. United States, 371 F.2d 450, 458 , 178 Ct.Cl. 1, 13 (1967); Robertson Elec. Co. v.

Mayer v. United States

145 Ct. Cl. 181 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1959

As shown by letter dated August 27, 1954, the Board of Appeals and Review reversed the action of the Eleventh *183 Regional Office and directed plaintiff’s restoration to duty. … Eberlein v. United States, 257 TJ.S. 82 (1921); Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290 (1900); Vaughn v. United States, 141 C. Cls. 208 ; Wittner v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 231, 235 (1948).

Krauss v. United States

40 Fed. Cl. 834 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 7, 1998

See, e.g., Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93-94 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 539 — 10, 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953); Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 874 (Fed.Cir. 1993); Bunch v. … See Sargisson v.

LE

22 I. & N. Dec. 113 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1998

Concurring and Dissenting Opinions: ROSENBERG, Board Member; GUENDELSBERGER, Board Member. Dissenting Opinions: SCHMIDT, Chairman; VILLAGELIU, Board Member. … See Matter of J- J-, 21 I&N Dec. 976 (BIA 1997) (stating that the Board may reopen on its own motion in exceptional circumstances); cf. Romero-Morales v.