Case law

Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States

79 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1934

Co. v. … In the absence of a showing of fraud or such gross error as may imply bad faith amounting to fraud the decision of the board is conclusive. United States v. Gleason, 175 U.S. 588 ; Rifley v.

United States v. Billin & Co.

9 Ct. Cust. 286 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 12, 1919

When the caso came on for hearing before the board no evidence-ivas offered by the importers and the case was apparently submitted to the board on the report and papers forwarded by the collector to-the board after the protest … In the case of United States v. Shallus ( 9 Ct. Cust. Appls., 168 ;. T.

Laningham v. United States

2 Cl. Ct. 535 · United States Court of Claims · May 31, 1983

See Gratehouse v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 288, 300-01 , 512 F.2d 1104, 1111 (1975); see also Huling v. United States, 185 Ct.Cl. 407, 412-13 , 401 F.2d 998, 1001 (1968); Campbell v. … Such a claim comes clearly within our jurisdiction and presents an appropriate occasion for reviewing the actions of a Correction Board under 28 U.S.C. § 1491 . Sanders v.

Ashley v. Derwinski

2 Vet. App. 62 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 9, 1992

Relying upon this Court’s decision in Chadwick v. … .); Rosler v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 241 (1991).

United States v. Francklyn

4 Ct. Cust. 54 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 21, 1913

No court decision directly in point is cited; but in Rice v. United States ( 123 Fed., 195 ) the correctness of the Government’s present *58 -contention was assumed, and Saxonville Mills v. Russell ( 116 U. … The opinion of the board was in accord with the foregoing, but the -collector’s action was reversed by the board on grounds not stated in the opinion, presumably on the ground that the proper divisor to be used in ascertaining

Entravision Communications Corporation v. Liberman Television LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jan 26, 2015

See General Council of the Assemblies of God v. Heritage Music Foundation, 97 USPQ2d 1890, 1893 (TTAB 2011); and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure (“TBMP”) § 401.03 (2014). … The Board will not consider substantive objections to testimony prior to trial. See, e.g., Carl Karcher Enterprises Inc. v.

12-18 220

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 30, 2015

See Moreau v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 389, 394 (1996). … See 38 C.F.R. § 3.102; Mittleider v. West, 11 Vet. App. 181 (1998) citing Mitchem v. Brown, 9 Vet.

Harris v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 180 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 20, 1991

Congress granted this Court “exclusive jurisdiction to review decisions of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.” 38 U.S.C. § 4052 (a) (1988). … Carter/Mondale Presidential Comm., Inc. v. FEC, 711 F.2d 279 , 284-85 n. 9 (D.C.Cir.1983).

Randolph v. United States

31 Fed. Cl. 779 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 1994

Kirwin v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 497, 502 (1991) (quoting Dzialo v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 554, 561 (1984)); see also Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed.Cir.1983); De Cicco v. … O’Neil v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 317, 319 (1984) (quoting Stephens v. United States, 174 Ct.Cl. 365, 373 , 358 F.2d 951, 955 (1966)).

Metra Chem Corp. v. Commissioner

88 T.C. 654 · United States Tax Court · Mar 23, 1987

Nash also served on the board of directors of Metra Chem and prepared its corporate Federal returns. … See, e.g., Woodbury v. Commissioner, 49 T.C. 180, 199 (1967); Brown v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 399, 410 (1967), affd. per curiam 398 F.2d 832 (6th Cir. 1968).

Jany Renz, Jean Pierre Bourquin, Guido Gamboni and Gustav Schwarb v. Robert Michel Jacob and Gilbert Louis Regnier

326 F.2d 792 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 23, 1964

Appellees, citing Schweyer v. Thomas, 68 F.2d 953 , 21 CCPA 859; Robie v. Carlton, 171 F.2d 310 , 36 CCPA 739; Braren v. Horner, 47 F.2d 358 , 18 CCPA 971; and Dreyfus v. … Appellees, citing Malm et al. v. Schneider, 101 F.2d 201 , 26 CCPA 783; George T. Southgate v. Albert E. Greene, 57 F.2d .374, 19 CCPA 1129; Knight v. King, 82 F.2d 817 , 23 CCPA 1074; and Bac v.

Frey v. Wagner

87 F.2d 212 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 25, 1937

Appert v. Brownsville Plate Glass Co. (C. C.) 144 F. 115 ; Benjamin W. Jones v. Clarence T. Evans, 46 F.(2d) 197 , 18 C.C. P.A. (Patents) 866; Altorfer & Dehle v. Haag, 74 F.(2d) 129 , 22 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 806. … MacLaren v. Joseph J. Stoetzel, 38 F. (2d) 125, 17 C.C.P.A: (Patents) 857; Nystrom & Landwehr v. Mancuso, 64 F.(2d) 698 , 20 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 934.

United States v. Waterhouse

1 Ct. Cust. 353 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 27, 1911

Prior to the Ranlett case the principle of segregation therein enunciated seems to have been recognized both by the board and the courts. See United States v. Brewer (92 Fed. Rep., 343); Weil v. United States (115 Fed. … Rep., 592); United States v. Helmrath (135 Fed. Rep., 912); United States. v Myers (140 Fed. Rep., 648). The case of the United States v.

Application of Limestone Products Corporation of America

312 F.2d 825 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 13, 1963

The decisions of this court in In re Deister Concentrator Company, Inc., 289 F.2d 496 , 48 CCPA 952, and Weiss Noodle Co. v. … The decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board is affirmed. Affirmed.

Appalachian Floor Co. v. United States

144 Ct. Cl. 11 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 5, 1958

Hurvey Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. U.S., 126 C. Cls. 383 ; Ultermehle v. Norment, 197 U.S. 40, 56 (1905); Hunt v. Rousmaniere’s Adm., 1 Pet. 1, 15 ; Bank of the United States v. Daniel, 12 Pet. 32, 55 ; U.S. v. … Hodson, 10 Wall. 379 , 409; Lamborn v. County Commissioners, 97 U.S. 181, 185 ; Snell v. Insurance Co., 98 U.S. 85, 90, 92 ; Allen v. Galloway, 30 Fed. Rep. 466. R. H. Stearns Co. v. U. S., 291 U.

Tower v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 95 · United States Customs Court · Mar 10, 1955

Brown v. Maryland, 25 U. S. 266, 279 . See also Pacific Insurance Co. v. Soule, 74 U. … The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois v. United States, 20 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 134, T. D. 45773.

Niles v. Commissioner

20 B.T.A. 949 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 24, 1930

See also Board of Education v. Bakewell, 122 Ill. 339 ; 10 N. E. 378 . In the case of Inhabitants of Orono v. … Board of Education v. Bakewell, supra.

Barbara Kinnard v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 30, 2024

Brown v. Office of Personnel Management, 86 M.S.P.R. 417, ¶ 8 (2000). … Trinkl v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 727 F. App’x 1007, 1010 (Fed.

Mantz v. Jackson

140 F.2d 161 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 3, 1944

See Schultz v. Dunham, 21 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 706, 67 F. (2d) 501, 19 USPQ 285 ; Bechtold v. Lanser, 28 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1051, 82 F. (2d) 415, 29 USPQ 130 ; Frey v. Wagner, 24 C. C. P. A. … the board with respect to the contentions of Mantz meet with our full approval.

Application of Gene O. Sinex

309 F.2d 488 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 14, 1962

For .the reasons hereinafter stated, we think the board was correct. … This expression falls within the rule of the cases listed in Appendix “A” to Kropa v.