Case law

Elchibegoff v. United States

106 Ct. Cl. 541 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1946

The Economic Defense Board later became known as the Board of Economic Warfare, and still later it became the Foreign Economic Administration, and was placed under the Office for Emergency Management. … It cites the cases of Hart v. United States, 91 C. Cls. 308 ; Krueger v. United States, 83 C. Cls. 412 ; Goodwin v. United States, 76 C. Cls. 218 ; O'Neil v. United States, 56 C. Cls. 89 .

Porter v. United States

131 Fed. Cl. 552 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2017

See Pearl v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 301, 308 (2013); Haskins v. United States, 51 Fed. … Richardson v. Perales,402 U.S. 389,401 (1971) (quoting Consol' Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197 ,229 (1938)). The court is limited to reviewing the record that was before the corrections board. Metz v.

Lawrence J. Palmatier v. Robert A. McDonald

28 Vet. App. 136 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 10, 2015

ORDER On February 11, 2014, the Court affirmed a July 16, 2012, decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) that assigned an effective date of June 11, 2002, for a 40% disability rating for a low back condition … Palmatier v. McDonald, No. 2014-7097, slip op. at 8, 2015 WL 5559595, at 4* (Fed. Cir. Sept. 22, 2015).

ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United States

524 F.2d 680 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1975

Corp. v. United States, 201 Ct. … Without such specific supported demonstration of factual Board error the Board’s statement of facts will be accepted. Jefferson Constr. Co. v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 581, 589 , 368 F. 2d 247, 252 (1966).

George Duggan v. Department of Defense

Merit Systems Protection Board · May 3, 2023

appellant of the opportunity to have his case decided on the merits.  5 Brown v. … Schnell v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 673 F. App’x 1011 (Fed. Cir. 2017).  6 v.

Wollman v. United States

108 Fed. Cl. 656 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 6, 2013

Compare Barnick v. United States, 591 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.Cir.2010) (decision of Air Force Board for the Correction of Military Records), Fisher v. … United States, 101 Fed.Cl. 245, 262-63 (2011) (decision of Board for Correction of Naval Records), and Loomis v.

210601-163512

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 30, 2021

See Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155 (1993). … See Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155, 157 (1993).

United States v. Rappolt & Co.

9 Ct. Cust. 21 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 26, 1918

See also United States v. Downing & Co. ( 7 Ct. Cust. Appls., 479, 482-483 ; T. D. 37052). … We think, however, tliat tlie board, erred in this conclusion.

Gresham & Co. v. United States

470 F.2d 542 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1972

Foster Sportswear Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. … Chernick v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 498 , 372 F. 2d 492 *121 (1967); Chris Berg, Inc. v. Unnited States, 186 Ct. Cl. 389 , 404 F. 2d 364 (1968); J. A. Jones Constr. Co. v. United States, 182 Ct.

SEDA

17 I. & N. Dec. 550 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1980

See Favors v. State, 214 S.E2d 645 (Ga. 1975); State v. Wiley, 210 S.E.2d 790 (Ga. 1974). … Blumen v.

Bodine v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 661 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 27, 1988

The Board, in Ketchem v. DOT, [12 M.S.P.R. at 2] at 9, took official notice of the fact that an illegal PATCO strike began on August 3, 1981 and continued at least through August 6, 1981. Further, in Schapansky v. … In light of the above, the holding of the Board in Schapansky , and because removal has been held by American Postal Workers Union v.

In Re Cooper

134 F.2d 630 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 1, 1943

Appellants contend that the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in the case of Becket v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents, 69 App.D.C. 51 , 98 F.2d 332 , supports their position. … For the reasons stated herein the decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

Derian, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 1, 2023

A valid claim from a contracting officer’s final decision is a prerequisite to jurisdiction by the Board. See Parsons Glob. Servs., Inc. v. McHugh, 677 F.3d 1166, 1170 (Fed. Cir. 2012). … Derian, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Farrar v. United States

358 F.2d 965 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964), and Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964). Stone v. United States, 160 Ct. … Accord: Grubin v. United States, 166 Ct. Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964); Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964).

Rochelle Wyatt v. United States Postal Service

Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 2, 2023

Vaughan v. Department of Agriculture, 116 M.S.P.R. 319, ¶ 5 (2011). The agency bears the burden to prove its compliance with a Board order. Id. … See Brown v.

McCormick & Company, Inc. v. Marion K. Summers

354 F.2d 668 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 13, 1966

. * * * We cannot agree with the view expressed by the board. … DeWalt, Inc. v. Magna Power Tool Corp., 289 F.2d 656 , 48 CCPA 909.

The Joseph & Feiss Company v. Joseph Kanner Hat Co., Inc.

337 F.2d 1014 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 12, 1964

Ranney v. Bridges, 188 F.2d 588, 596 , 38 CCPA 1044, 1056. Accordingly we must agree with the board wherein it stated: “That Banner is using the mark ‘HENLEY’ is evident even from J & F’s record. … In view of the above the decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed.

Russell v. United States

314 F.2d 809 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1963

Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1 , 310 F. 2d 381 , cert. denied in Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 ; Odell v. United States, 134 Ct. Cl. 634 ; Gordon v. United States, 134 Ct. Cl. 840 . … Jones v. United States, supra; Taylor v. United States, 143 Ct. Cl. 125 , 163 F. Supp. 652 .

Snellenburg Clothing Co. v. United States

60 Ct. Cl. 592 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1925

The Board of Contract Adjustment made the following ■certificate: War Department, Board of Contract Adjustment, Washington. Form C. Claim No. 150-C-2119. … Hygienic Fibre Co. v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 598 . Poole Engineering & Machine Co. v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 9 . Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,001. It is so ordered.

Ricky N. Dawson v. Department of Agriculture

2014 MSPB 67 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 21, 2014

In Cleveland Board of Education v. … Walls v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 29 F.3d 1578, 1582 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (“‘broad equitable principles of justice and good conscience’ should be applied in good cause determinations”) (quoting Alonzo v.