Case law

Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States

429 F. Supp. 2d 1338 · United States Court of International Trade · Apr 24, 2006

United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987); see also Rust v. … See Block v. N. Dak., 461 U.S. at 292 (citing Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 (1980); Soriano v. United States, 352 U.S. 270 (1957)).

In re Quik-Print Copy Shops, Inc.

616 F.2d 523 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 13, 1980

The decision of the board is affirmed. AFFIRMED. . … Star Watch Case Co. v. Gebruder Junghans, A. G. 46 CCPA 929, 267 F.2d 950 , 122 USPQ 370 (1959).

In re Fink

62 F.2d 103 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 19, 1932

D. 274, and Cohn v. United States Corset Co., 1877 C. D. 205.) … The board and the examiner both held that the purity of the product was merely a matter of degree.

Garstin v. United States

352 F.2d 537 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1965

Knoell, et al. v. United States, 236 F. Supp. 299 (D.C.W.D.Pa. 1964). See also Love v. United States, 141 F. 2d 981 (8th Cir. 1944); United States v. … Wilson v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 271 (1960) and Robert E. Davis v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 162 (1964).

Schutt Construction Co. v. United States

353 F.2d 1018 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

E.g., Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States, 109 Ct. Cl. 517 , 74 F. Supp. 165 (1947); Chernus v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 264 (1948); Loftis v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 551 , 76 F. … Fehlhaber Corporation v. United States, supra. However, the further conclusion of the Board that recovery should be limited to the excess acreage over IS percent is not based on any strong legal ground.

MARTINEZ-LOPEZ

10 I. & N. Dec. 409 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1964

Poonian v. United States, supra; Dear Wing Jung v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Intermoun- tain Express Co., 228 F.2d 170, 176 (C.A. 8), certiorari denied, 351 U.S. 952; Lane v.

Parker v. Frilette

462 F.2d 544 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 13, 1972

Eurwits v. … See, Brinker v. Kray, Patent Appeal No. 8734, decided June 1, 1972. The board found Parker has not done SO' here, and we must agree.

Russell & Pugh Lumber Company v. United States

290 F.2d 938 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

price per thousand board feet, was included. … See e. g., Breese Burners, Inc. v. United States, 1954, 121 F.Supp. 530 , 128 Ct.Cl. 649 ; Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. United States, 1947, 109 Ct.Cl. 390 .

Doe v. United States

35 Fed. Cl. 85 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 29, 1996

E.g., Adkins v. United States, 68 F.3d 1317, 1321 (Fed.Cir.1995); Sargisson v. United States, 913 F.2d 918, 920 (Fed.Cir. 1990); Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 779 (Fed.Cir.1988); Heisig v. … Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 90 , 73 S.Ct. 534, 538-39 , 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953); Maier v. Orr, 754 F.2d 973, 984 (Fed.Cir.1985); Brenner v.

13-34 626

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 4, 2015

Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518, 519 (1996), citing Gilbert, 1 Vet. App. at 54. … When an extraschedular rating may be warranted, the Board must refer the case to designated VA officials. See Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 377 (1996).

Dorothy Rollins v. Anthony J. Principi

17 Vet. App. 294 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 25, 2003

See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), (1)(B), (2)(B); Scarborough v. Principi, 319 F.3d 1346, 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2003); Bazalo v. West, 150 F.3d 1380, 1383-84 (Fed. Cir. 1998); Briddell, 16 Vet.App. at 271; Cullens v. … and Care Home, Inc. v.

Application of Bigelow

194 F.2d 550 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 14, 1952

The board reversed the examiner’s rejection on prior art. … In re Hoffmann, 58 F.2d 422 , 19 C.C.P.A., Patents 1185; Nat Lewis Purses, Inc., v. Carole Bags, Inc., 2 Cir., 83 F.2d 475 .

PINEDA

21 I. & N. Dec. 1017 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1997

see also Hernandez-Rodriguez v. … INS, 376 U.S. 120, 128 (1964); Kessler v. Strecker, 307 U.S. 22, 30 (1939). As the Court stated in Costello v.

In re McKellin

529 F.2d 1324 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 22, 1976

Our analysis should not be confined to the board’s reasoning alone since we review the decision of the board on the stated ground of rejection and not merely its reasoning in support of that decision. Hunt v. … See Schnick v. Fenn, 277 F.2d 935 , 938 n. 2, 47 CCPA 1174, 1178 n. 3 (1960).

M-B-A

23 I. & N. Dec. 474 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2002

See INS v. … Metropolitan Stevedore Co. v. Rambo, 521 U.S. 121, 137 (1997) (quoting Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston, 459 U.S. 375, 390 (1983)); see also Addington v. Texas, supra, at 423.

FloorPro, Inc. v. United States

94 Fed. Cl. 775 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 23, 2010

In June of 2009, the Federal Circuit vacated the Board’s decision and remanded the matter for dismissal. See Winter v. FloorPro, 570 F.3d 1367 (Fed.Cir. 2009). … See Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United States, 161 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed.Cir.1998). The Government relies on the rule established in Brighton Village Assoc. v.

Moran Bros. v. United States

61 Ct. Cl. 73 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 14, 1925

all review of the board’s action. … United States v. North Carolina, 136 U.S. 211, 216 . See also Sherman case, 98 U. S. 565 ; Angarica v. Bayard, 127 U.S. 251, 260 .

Martin v. Department of the Air Force

227 Ct. Cl. 742 · United States Court of Claims · May 22, 1981

Alonzo v. Department of the Air Force, No. DA075209013; Coefield v. Department of the Navy, No. SF07509012; and Russell v. Department of the Interior, No. SF075209018. … The Board refused the appeal because of failure to meet these criteria.

United States v. Sussfeld

7 Ct. Cust. 126 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 23, 1916

The question of the application of the ejusdem generis rule was fully considered by the court in Gallagher & Ascher et al. v. United States ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 105 ; T. … The decision of the board is affirmed.

Borys v. United States

201 Ct. Cl. 597 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1973

See Muldonian v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 99 , 432 F. 2d 443 (1970); and Krivoski v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 451 , 145 F. Supp. 239 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 954 . … Gen. 742 (1964); and Richard v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 33 , 152 F. Supp. 433 (1956). In 43 Comp.