Case law

In re Skoll

523 F.2d 1392 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 23, 1975

), while Test V gave a copper plating of 0.4 mil thickness when 10 grams of sucrose was employed. … We conclude that the board’s comparison of Test VIII with Test V was reasonable and that the affidavit fails to support appellant’s allegation that the amount of carbohydrate required by the claims is critical.

Application of Francis J. Boylan

392 F.2d 1017 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 25, 1968

Kistler v. … v.

Joseph E. Schmitz v. Office of Personnel Management

Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 20, 2016

House v. Department of the Army, 98 M.S.P.R. 530, ¶ 9 (2005). The agency bears the burden to prove its compliance with a Board order. … Brown v. Office of Personnel Management, 113 M.S.P.R. 325, ¶ 5 (2010). ¶5 On September 21, 2015, OPM filed a submission purporting to show full compliance with this order. MSPB Docket No.

John Doe v. Department of Justice

2014 MSPB 75 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 23, 2014

Doe v. Department of Justice, 118 M.S.P.R. 434, ¶ 3 (2012) (Doe I). The appellant filed an appeal of his removal to the Board. Id., ¶ 5. … Grimes v. 6 The Board is not permitted to grant summary judgment because an appellant has the right to a hearing pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1). Crispin v.

Dynalectron Corp. v. United States

518 F.2d 594 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 11, 1975

Cl. 996 (1972), refused to review the Board denial of excess reprocurement costs to the Government. We cited S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 406 U.S. 1 (1972). … Cl. 518 , 360 F. 2d 634 (1966 ); Natus Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 1 , 371 F. 2d 450 (1967); Tecon Corp. v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 436 , 411 F. 2d 1271 (1969); Tombigbee Constructors v.

11-02 249

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

Hall v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 294 (1993). However, an apportionment of benefits under 38 C.F.R. § 3.450 may not cause undue financial hardship on the Veteran. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.451 (2014). … Elias v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 259, 263 (1997). The record indicates that, at the time J.H. filed a claim for apportionment, the Veteran lived apart from his minor children, over whom she is guardian.

In re Hamilton

64 F.2d 141 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 17, 1933

Before leaving this branch of the case we would observe that in the case of Bresnahan et al. v. … Eibel Process Company v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Company, 261 U. S. 45 .

Cooper v. Comm'r

143 T.C. 194 · United States Tax Court · Sep 23, 2014

Cooper contacted Anthony Brown, who was in the business of helping inventors protect and enforce their patents. Mr. Brown owned IP Innovation, LLC (IP Innovation). Subsequently, TLC, Mr. … Cooper, Acacia, 15 and Anthony Brown.

Shafi Nasimi Construction and Logistics Company

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jan 6, 2016

The 90-day appeal period to the Board, 41 U.S.C. § 7104(a), expired on 3 March 2012. … [Citations omitted] See also Decker & Co. v. West, 76 F.3d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States

429 F. Supp. 2d 1338 · United States Court of International Trade · Apr 24, 2006

United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987); see also Rust v. … See Block v. N. Dak., 461 U.S. at 292 (citing Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 (1980); Soriano v. United States, 352 U.S. 270 (1957)).

In re Quik-Print Copy Shops, Inc.

616 F.2d 523 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 13, 1980

The decision of the board is affirmed. AFFIRMED. . … Star Watch Case Co. v. Gebruder Junghans, A. G. 46 CCPA 929, 267 F.2d 950 , 122 USPQ 370 (1959).

Garstin v. United States

352 F.2d 537 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1965

Knoell, et al. v. United States, 236 F. Supp. 299 (D.C.W.D.Pa. 1964). See also Love v. United States, 141 F. 2d 981 (8th Cir. 1944); United States v. … Wilson v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 271 (1960) and Robert E. Davis v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 162 (1964).

Schutt Construction Co. v. United States

353 F.2d 1018 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

E.g., Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States, 109 Ct. Cl. 517 , 74 F. Supp. 165 (1947); Chernus v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 264 (1948); Loftis v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 551 , 76 F. … Fehlhaber Corporation v. United States, supra. However, the further conclusion of the Board that recovery should be limited to the excess acreage over IS percent is not based on any strong legal ground.

MARTINEZ-LOPEZ

10 I. & N. Dec. 409 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1964

Poonian v. United States, supra; Dear Wing Jung v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Intermoun- tain Express Co., 228 F.2d 170, 176 (C.A. 8), certiorari denied, 351 U.S. 952; Lane v.

Biggins v. Derwinski

1 Vet. App. 474 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 25, 1991

We hold (1) that the determination by the Board of Veterans’s Appeals (BVA or Board) that appellant’s multiple sclerosis was not incurred during her period of active duty for training was not clearly erroneous, 38 U.S.C. … Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vt.App. 49, 52-53 (1990); see also Lovelace v. Derwinski, 1 *477 Vt.App. 73 (1990); Hillyard v. Derwinski, 1 Vt.App. 349 (1991).

Russell & Pugh Lumber Company v. United States

290 F.2d 938 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

price per thousand board feet, was included. … See e. g., Breese Burners, Inc. v. United States, 1954, 121 F.Supp. 530 , 128 Ct.Cl. 649 ; Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. United States, 1947, 109 Ct.Cl. 390 .

BONNETTE

17 I. & N. Dec. 587 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1980

v. … , supra; Nation v.

13-34 626

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 4, 2015

Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 518, 519 (1996), citing Gilbert, 1 Vet. App. at 54. … When an extraschedular rating may be warranted, the Board must refer the case to designated VA officials. See Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 377 (1996).

Dorothy Rollins v. Anthony J. Principi

17 Vet. App. 294 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 25, 2003

See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), (1)(B), (2)(B); Scarborough v. Principi, 319 F.3d 1346, 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2003); Bazalo v. West, 150 F.3d 1380, 1383-84 (Fed. Cir. 1998); Briddell, 16 Vet.App. at 271; Cullens v. … and Care Home, Inc. v.

American Telecom Corp. v. United States

59 Fed. Cl. 467 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2004

Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974), overruled on other grounds by Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183 , 104 S.Ct. 3012 , 82 L.Ed.2d 139 (1984); Boyle v. … In Marshall Associated Contractors, Inc. v.