Case law

Lawrence Mattison v. Department of Veterans Affairs

2016 MSPB 27 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 14, 2016

Gonzalez v. … FOR THE BOARD: ______________________________ Jennifer Everling Acting Clerk of the Board Washington, D.C.

In Re Chase

71 F.2d 178 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 12, 1934

It is the Board’s affirmance of this decision that brought about the instant appeal. Claims 1 and 10 were not included in the counts of the interference (Friden v. … The Board’s decision is short and refers to its above-mentioned decision in the appeal' in the interference proceeding Friden v. Chase No. 60,503.

Oakes v. Comm'r

44 T.C. 524 · United States Tax Court · Jul 6, 1965

They rely on such decisions as Skemp v. Commissioner, 168 F. 2d 598 (C.A. 7, 1948), reversing 8 T.C. 415 (1947); Brown v. Commissioner, 180 F. 2d 926 (C.A. 8, 1950), reversing 12 T.C. 1095 (1949); and Albert T. … Skemp v. Commissioner, supra, and Brown v. Commissioner, supra. Just because a series of transactions was used to accomplish the same end does not alter the ultimate tax result.

Budnik v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 185 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 4, 1992

See Thompson v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 251, 252-253 (1991). In Manio v. … The Court expects that the BVA will reexamine the evidence of record, seek any other evidence the Board feels is necessary, and issue a timely, well-supported decision in this case.” Fletcher v.

State Trial Attorneys Ass'n v. Flournoy

522 F.2d 1406 · Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1975

Indeed, California joined its employee plaintiffs in challenging the validity of Pay Board— CLC action limiting the employees’ pay increases. … United States v. California, 504 F.2d 750 (Em.App., 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1015 , 95 S.Ct. 2428 , 44 L.Ed.2d 684 (1975). The statement of this court in Carpenters 46 County Conference Board et al. v.

Condenser Service & Engineering Co. v. United States

128 F. Supp. 148 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1955

Board. … In Hanson v. United States, 117 C. Cls. 605 , we awarded an amount less than the Appeal Board had allowed. The question so warmly contested in the instant case was not raised by the parties and we were not aware of it.

United States v. Estate of Boshell

14 Ct. Cust. 273 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 19, 1922

The Board of General Appraisers, now the United States Customs Court, sustained the protest on the authority of its decision rendered November 29, 1922, in Meadows, Wye & Co. v. United States, T. D. 39342, G. A. 8584. … Fabbri v. Murphy, 95 U. S. 191 ; Hartranft v. Oliver, 125 U. S. 525 ; United States v. Burr, 159 U. S. 78 ; United States v. Goodsell Co. 84 Fed. 439 ; Mosle v. Bidwell, 130 Fed. 334 .

Application of Schenectady Varnish Company, Inc

280 F.2d 169 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 6, 1960

Inc. v. Watson, D.C.D.C.1957, 156 F.Supp. 161 , affirmed 1958, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 299 , 258 F.2d 151 .” … The board appears to be correct in stating that :“It is .questionable that applicant has used the mark on synthetic resins since 1917, * * The board properly noted that “if applicant ultimately prevails in this case, the

Penguin Industries, Inc. v. United States

530 F.2d 934 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1976

On these facts, which must be accepted on this appeal, plaintiff has failed to sustain its burden and the Board must be sustained in its conclusion that the data package was not defective, Clark Grave Vault Co. v. … Corp. v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 182 , 488 F. 2d 980 (1973); Red Circle Corp. v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 1 , 398 F. 2d 836 (1968); *125 Russell R. Cannon Co. v. United States, 189 Ct.

Cooper v. Comm'r

143 T.C. 194 · United States Tax Court · Sep 23, 2014

Cooper contacted Anthony Brown, who was in the business of helping inventors protect and enforce their patents. Mr. Brown owned IP Innovation, LLC (IP Innovation). Subsequently, TLC, Mr. … Cooper, Acacia, 15 and Anthony Brown.

BONNETTE

17 I. & N. Dec. 587 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1980

v. … , supra; Nation v.

Application of Coleman

189 F.2d 976 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 5, 1951

The Board of Appeals cited the case of Smith v. Kingsland, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 284 , 178 F.2d 26 , for its exposition on the applicable law of double patenting. … In Kistler v. Coe, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 36 , 142 F.2d 94 , also cited by the board and cited in Smith v. Kingsland, supra, a patent was issued covering a material known as aerogel.

WALDEI

19 I. & N. Dec. 189 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1984

See Garcia v. Smith, 674 F.2d 838 (11th Cir. 1982). … See Garcia v. Smith, supra. We are aware that the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Yiu Sing Chun v.

Mills Automatic Merchandising Corp. v. United States

19 F. Supp. 247 · United States Court of Claims · May 3, 1937

The taxpayer elected to appeal and by so doing brought itself squarely within the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Old Colony Trust Company v. … Emery v. United States (D.C.) 27 F.(2d) 992 , and Old Colony R. R. Co. v. United States (D.C.) 27 F.(2d) 994 , hold that the petitioner still retains this earlier remedy.

Application of George E. Myers

410 F.2d 420 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 22, 1969

Co., Inc. et al. v. … In this respect, this case is not unlike Kropa v.

Harold S. Hemstreet v. William S. Rohland

433 F.2d 1403 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 3, 1970

Daley v. Wiltshire, 293 F.2d 677 , 49 CCPA 719 (1961). … Kuppenbender v. Riszdorfer, 104 F.2d 791, 795-796 , 26 CCPA 1436, 1440-1442 (1939); Wirkler v. Perkins, 245 F.2d *1407 502, 504-505, 44 CCPA 1005, 1008-1009 (1957).

Joyce v. United States

2 Cl. Ct. 226 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1983

Pascal v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 183, 189 , 543 F.2d 1284, 1288 (1976). … Harvin v. United States, No. 167-80C at 7 (Ct.Cl. 1981), 661 F.2d 885, 889 (1981).

Korte-Fusco Joint Venture

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Nov 5, 2015

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986). … However, when interpreting a contract, the Board must consider the document as a whole and interpret it so as to harmonize and give reasonable meaning to all of its parts. NVT Technologies, Inc. v.

Dunn v. Commissioner

57 T.C.M. 1295 · United States Tax Court · Aug 15, 1989

DUNN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Dunn v. Commissioner Docket No. 30798-87 United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1989-428 ; 1989 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 426 ; 57 T.C.M. (CCH) 1295 ; T.C.M. … Although petitioner was Hedmark's sole shareholder, the record does not reflect Hedmark's board of directors' membership. ↩ 4.

Johnson Controls, Inc. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,445 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 13, 1982

Subsequently, the Federal Republic of Germany contracted with the consortium of Brown, Boveri, & Cie AG and plaintiff to perform the work. … Due to difficulties encountered during the project, Brown, Boveri & Cie AG terminated its consortium agreement with the plaintiff.