Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.43s
136 T.C. 99 · United States Tax Court · Feb 3, 2011
The burden was not placed on the taxpayer to initiate interest netting or to establish entitlement. … Neither party in the case had raised sovereign immunity as an issue.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States v. Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp.
74 F. Supp. 2d 1311 · United States Court of International Trade · Oct 8, 1999
Although Hervey did hold Gaudin to be inapplicable to the mixed law and fact question with which it was presented, Hervey's holding was made in regard to a claim of qualified immunity. … Questions of qualified immunity are often treated as preliminary questions that, though possessing factual elements, are to be decided by courts. See Hunter v.
Cited 1 timesPublished48 Fed. Cl. 15 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 6, 2000
The doctrine is well established in the jurisprudence of administrative law, McKart v. … But where Congress has not clearly required exhaustion, sound judicial discretion governs.” McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. at 144 , 112 S.Ct. 1081 (citations omitted); accord Maggitt v.
Cited 9 timesPublished14 Cl. Ct. 795 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1988
Henry (taxpayer) commenced operating Qualified Personnel (Qualified) as a sole proprietorship, with its principal place of business in Wilmington, North Carolina. Qualified engaged in business as a labor broker. … During 1980, discussions ensued between IRS and Qualified, principally with Qualified’s agent, Windham, 2 with respect to the claim.
Cited 5 timesPublished4 B.T.A. 1286 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 30, 1926
The laying of the new tracks clearly represents a capital expenditure. … No testimony was introduced by one qualified to value the siding on March 1, 1913, and for lack of evidence we must therefore affirm the action of the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKlahn v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Sevices
31 Fed. Cl. 382 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 24, 1994
The Program was established in 1986 as part of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, Pub.L. No. 99-660, tit. Ill, § 311(a), 100 Stat. 3758 . … IV1992). 1 For convenience, further reference to the Program in this order will be to the relevant subsection of “42 U.S.C. § 300aa — __” 2 Petitioner is an immune deficient individual.
Cited 7 timesPublishedRollock Company v. United States
115 Fed. Cl. 317 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 28, 2014
monitoring in the same manner, i.e., with an 5 The regulation provides that payment for a self-move by a business may be based on “[t]he lower of two bids or estimates prepared by a commercial mover or qualified … Congress created the Relocation Act to establish a “[u]niform policy on real property acquisition practices.” 42 U.S.C. § 4651 (heading).
Cited 14 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
34 Fed. Cl. 663 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 19, 1995
Sec’y of HHS, 2 F.3d 1128 , 1135 n. 12 (Fed.Cir.1993) (sovereign immunity’s constraints discussed in context of Vaccine Act review). … Without qualifying language, the provision mandates that no one who “brings a civil action” may file a Vaccine Act petition.
Cited 1 timesPublished30 B.T.A. 1265 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 24, 1934
It is clearly expressed in In re Arms’ Estate, 186 Cal. 554 ; 199 Pac. 1050 , as follows: It has long been the established law of this state that where a husband brings into this state money or property acquired by him during … to abridge the privileges and immunities of the citizen.
Cited 4 timesPublished62 Fed. Cl. 139 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 28, 2004
And because of this sovereign immunity, the actions of its agents cannot bind the United States unless such agents acted with explicit lawful authority. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. … And, clearly, the contracting officer had the authority to bind the government.
Cited 19 timesPublished59 Fed. Cl. 493 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 16, 2004
Moreover, it is well established that federal judges are immune from claims for monetary damages based on the performance of judicial functions within their jurisdiction. See Mireles v. … Because the denial of *497 Plaintiffs motion for default judgment was clearly a judicial act, the District Judge is immune from suit for monetary damages based on this conduct.
Cited 10 timesPublishedCinder Products Corp. v. United States
52 Cust. Ct. 49 · United States Customs Court · Mar 3, 1964
Section 507 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides: The Secretary of the Treasury is hereby authorized to prescribe and issue regulations for the ascertainment of tare upon imported merchandise, including the establishment of … United States, supra, that section 507 clearly imposes a duty upon a nonimportation, such as moisture and impurities usually found in or upon such or similar merchandise, and it was held that no allowance could be granted
Cited 3 timesPublishedCeres Gulf, Inc. v. United States
94 Fed. Cl. 303 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 7, 2010
Defendant’s narrow application of the Court’s bid protest jurisdiction is contrary to established law. … According to Ceres Gulf, there is no material difference between the phrases “clearly set forth” and “clearly demonstrate.” Id. The Court finds no merit to Ceres Gulfs assertion.
Cited 23 timesPublishedPeterson Marital Trust v. Commissioner
102 T.C. 790 · United States Tax Court · Jun 28, 1994
Peterson, who died before 1982 and established section 2056(b)(5) marital deduction trusts, less favorably than individuals who died after 1981 and established section 2056(b)(7) “qtip” trusts. … Id. 16 Accordingly, the different GST tax treatment accorded (1) individuals who died before 1982 and established section 2056(b)(5) marital deduction trusts and (2) individuals who died after 1981 and established section
Cited 95 timesPublishedBricklayers Ben. Plans, Inc. v. Commissioner
81 T.C. 735 · United States Tax Court · Oct 13, 1983
The trustees’ funds, which had been previously established pursuant to collective bargaining agreements entered into by several bricklaying companies and the unions representing their employees, were designated as "Charter … If petitioner did not provide for the payment of benefits, it would clearly fall outside the coverage of sec. 501(c)(9).
Cited 2 timesPublishedQingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Corp., Ltd. v. United States
938 F. Supp. 2d 1312 · United States Court of International Trade · Sep 16, 2013
On March 26, 2013, Commerce rescinded the NSR because Maycarrier did not qualify as a new shipper. See Final Rescission, 78 Fed. Reg. at 18,317. … “The burden of establishing jurisdiction lies with the party seeking to invoke th[e] Court's jurisdiction.” Bhullar v. United States, 27 CIT 532, 535, 259 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDe Bazan v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
70 Fed. Cl. 687 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 15, 2006
De Bazan established a pri-ma facie case by a preponderance of the evidence. … ANALYSIS The legal standards for establishing causation are at issue in this case.
Reversed on other grounds by De Bazan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 539 F.3d 1347 (2008)Cited 5 timesPublished25 I. & N. Dec. 431 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2011
Such a result would clearly be at odds with the entire basis for fiancé(e) visa status and current administrative practice. … The fiancé(e) must still demonstrate the underlying bona fides of the qualifying marriage.
Cited 21 timesPublishedCWT Farms, Inc. v. Commissioner
79 T.C. 86 · United States Tax Court · Jul 19, 1982
at the close of its taxable year must be "qualified export assets.” … It is well established that in interpreting legislation, the Court should consider not only the words of the statute, but also the effect of the interpretation of those words. See, e.g., Corn Products Refining Co. v.
Cited 15 timesPublished13 I. & N. Dec. 729 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1971
We find that the facts of this case are clearly distinguishable from those of the Or- tega case. … However, the phrase "for the purpose of performing," in sec- tion 212(a) (14), clearly indicates that an alien within its pur- view must establish a bona fide intent to engage in his profession, at least in the foreseeable
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna