Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.05s
R.G. Robbins & Co. v. United States
31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,906 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 14, 1983
Altimont, Inc. v. United States, 217 Ct.Cl. 628 , 579 F.2d 622 (1978). … Astro-Space Labs, Inc. v. United States, 200 Ct.Cl. 282 , 296, 470 F.2d 1003, 1011 (1972); Space Corp. v. United States, 200 Ct.Cl. 1, 6 , 470 F.2d 536, 539 (1972). .
Cited 1 timesPublished597 F.2d 270 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 26, 1979
Before the board, appellant argued that under the rationale in Beckwith v. … Such an opposition occurred in Seiler’s, Inc. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBrazoria Inv. Corp. v. Commissioner
20 T.C. 690 · United States Tax Court · Jun 29, 1953
See Commissioner v. Jacobson, 336 U. S. 28 ; Helvering v. American Dental Co., 318 U. S. 322 ; United States v. Kirby Lumber Co., 284 U. S. 1 . … Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. Commissioner, 339 U. S. 583 .
Cited 1 timesPublished213 F.2d 551 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 27, 1954
Miller v. … The board further and erroneously relied upon the doctrine of Andrews v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 12, 2015
Cir.), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 857 (1997)); accord Engage Learning, Inc. v. Salazar, 660 F.3d 1346, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2011); Lewis v. United States, 70 F.3d 597, 602, 604 (Fed. Cir. 1995); Gould, Inc. v. … This Order completes all necessary action by the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Permits, Inc. v. Fieldvine, Inc.
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Aug 15, 2024
As the Board explained in Spiritline Cruises LLC v. Tour Management Servs. … LLC v.
Cited 0 timesPublished596 F.2d 1019 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 26, 1979
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-3, 6, 9, and 10 in appellants’ application serial No. 639,391, filed … Although there may be patentable invention where the solution is obvious after the discovery of the cause of the problem, Eibel Process Co. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedJohn A. Johnson & Sons, Inc. v. United States
180 Ct. Cl. 969 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967
Co. v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 145 , 319 F. 2d 135 (1963); Consolidated Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 188 (1963); Cannon Constr. Co. v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 94 , 319 F. 2d 173 (1963). … Co. v. United States, supra; Cannon Constr. Co. v. United States, supra, 162 Ct. Cl. at 105, 319 F. 2d at 179.
Cited 23 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2015
See also DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995). … The Board has also considered whether the Veteran's left ankle disability resulted in a level of functional loss greater than that already contemplated by the assigned rating for this period. DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFort Howard Paper Company v. Gulf States Paper Corporation
376 F.2d 904 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 18, 1967
The board did not think so and neither do we. While, as we have often noted, prior decisions are not of much value in cases of this kind, we note appellant’s reliance on our opinion in Magnavox Co. v. … Bruce Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2015
Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed.Cir.1996) (table). … App.24, 25 (1991); see also Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (1995). The Veteran has not been shown to have the experience, training, or education necessary to make an etiology opinion to the claimed disability.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished500 F.2d 1160 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 1, 1974
that the presence in the Williams patent of a claim (23) with a more specific recitation of the selection feature than the counts indicates that the latter were intended to claim the invention more broadly, citing Oldroyd v. … Morgan, 57 F.2d 358 , 19 CCPA 1111 (1932) and Marshall v. Ledwinka, 67 F.2d 495 , 21 CCPA 728 (1933).
Cited 1 timesPublishedNorthwest Utilities Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 524 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 9, 1933
Morgan v. Forbes, 236 Mass. 480 ; 128 N. E. 792 ; O'Brien v. Boland, 166 Mass. 481 ; 44 N. E. 602 ; Howe v. Hayward, 108 Mass. 54 ; Hunt v. Weir, 100 Ind. 501 . … Inasmuch as the property was not otherwise encumbered, this Board sustained that sale. In Iowa Bridge Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished4 Ct. Cust. 49 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 28, 1913
That evidence might, in the absence of all other, be furnished by the importation itself or by a sample thereof. ' Krusi v. United States *51 ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 168 ; T. D. 31213); Knauth v. United States ( 1 Ct. … The judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.
Cited 2 timesPublished223 F.2d 497 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 1, 1955
art in rejecting the claims. (3) The Board improperly combined references in rejecting the claims. (4) The Board failed to recognize that there is no sound reason for including ixtle and sisal in the same botanical family … In the ease of Fowler et al. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMelvin D. Hurwitz v. George Shiu Yim Poon
364 F.2d 878 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 11, 1966
Our starting point is Young v. … As stated in Chandler v.
Cited 7 timesPublished397 F.2d 984 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1968
Jones Construction Co. v. … In Hoffman v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedApplication of Ralph L. Young and Kingsley E. Humbert, Jr
403 F.2d 754 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 5, 1968
The V-shaped accordion pleats have alternate edges respectively bonded to sheets 62 and 63 by glue or other means, *756 thereby forming a plurality of V-shaped cells 67. … In operation, a fluid to be treated is passed through openings 68 in sheet 62 into a top V-shaped cell 67, through filter paper 64, into a bottom V-shaped cell 67, and out through openings 69 in sheet 63.
Cited 4 timesPublished42 B.T.A. 505 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 9, 1940
Higgins v. Smith, 308 U. S. 473 . The Board, upon motion of the Commissioner, vacated its decision to consider the possible effect of the Supreme Court decision upon the Board decision. See order of January 18, 1940. … The Board now concludes that the decision of the Supreme Court requires modification of the decision of the Board in one respect and in only one respect.
Cited 4 timesPublished9 Cl. Ct. 273 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1985
Kester v. Horner, 778 F.2d 1565, 1570 (Fed.Cir.1985); see also Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 312-13 , 96 S.Ct. 2562, 2566-67 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976); Puglisi v. … Hary v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna