Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.52s

  • State Trial Attorneys Ass'n v. Flournoy

    522 F.2d 1406 · Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1975

    Indeed, California joined its employee plaintiffs in challenging the validity of Pay Board— CLC action limiting the employees’ pay increases. … United States v. California, 504 F.2d 750 (Em.App., 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1015 , 95 S.Ct. 2428 , 44 L.Ed.2d 684 (1975). The statement of this court in Carpenters 46 County Conference Board et al. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • MA

    22 I. & N. Dec. 67 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1998

    Circuit in Young v. … Young v. Reno, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Foster Wheeler Corp. v. United States

    513 F.2d 588 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1975

    Co. v. United States, 149 Ct.Cl. 514, 518 (1960). To the extent that the Board’s decision was one of law, this court is, of course, free to arrive at its own conclusions. Tombigbee Constructors v. … V Assumption of the Risk of Impossibility The Board found 20 that FWC generally assumed “contractual responsibility and risk” of impossibility.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. Basham

    477 F. Supp. 2d 1301 · United States Court of International Trade · Mar 6, 2007

    Humane Soc’y v. Brown, 19 CIT 1104, 1104, 901 F. Supp. 338, 340 (1995). … Holding Co. v. United States, 225 F.3d 1201, 1205 (2000) (noting that § 1581 "leaves the Customs Service a great deal of discretion . . . in deciding which vessels to board and search"); see also Autery v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Lord

    4 Ct. Cust. 322 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 26, 1913

    The decisions of the board just cited are not at all in conflict with the decisions reached in the protest of Leon Rheims Co. (T. D. 27541), affirmed by the Circuit Court in Leon Rheims Co. v. … United States ( 154 Fed., 969 ), and by the Circuit Court of Appeals in Leon Rheims Co. v. United States ( 160 Fed., 925 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Commissioner

    61 T.C. 599 · United States Tax Court · Feb 4, 1974

    BROWN, RICHARD M. COOPER, W. A. JOHNSON and HARRY C. … Gregory v. Helvering, supra; Moline Properties v. Commissioner, supra; Haas v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • J. A. Jones Construction Company v. The United States

    390 F.2d 886 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1968

    In addition, the parties stipulated before the ASBCA that the question of quantum was not before the Board, and the Board made no findings on the issue. … The Board’s second opinion reversed the first opinion on this point. 9 . See Natus Corp. v. United States, 371 F.2d 450, 458 , 178 Ct.Cl. 1, 13 (1967); Robertson Elec. Co. v.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • 11-02 249

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 28, 2014

    Hall v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 294 (1993). However, an apportionment of benefits under 38 C.F.R. § 3.450 may not cause undue financial hardship on the Veteran. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.451 (2014). … Elias v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 259, 263 (1997). The record indicates that, at the time J.H. filed a claim for apportionment, the Veteran lived apart from his minor children, over whom she is guardian.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Mandel

    1 Ct. Cust. 223 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 25, 1911

    D. 25878); Megros. v. United States (53 Fed. Rep., 244), and Fritz v. United States (135 Fed. … The cases of Seeberger v. Farwell ( 139 U. S., 608 ) and Magone v. Luckemeyer ( 139 U.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Application of National Distillers and Chemical Corporation, Doing Business as National Distillers Products Co

    297 F.2d 941 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 12, 1962

    As was stated in Avon Shoe Co., Inc. v. … Roth Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Scott v. Principi

    3 Vet. App. 352 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 9, 1992

    . *355 Walton v. Walton, 409 So.2d 858, 860 (Ala.1982) (citing Skipworth v. Skipworth, 360 So.2d 975 (Ala.1978)). See also Underwood v. … The Board cited Beck v. Beck, 286 Ala. 692 , 246 So.2d 420 (1971), and Herd v. Herd, 194 Ala. 613 , 69 So. 885 (1915) as examples of what constitutes a common-law marriage in Alabama.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carter v. United States

    152 Ct. Cl. 334 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1961

    Our attention is directed to the case of Gaddington v. United States, 147 Ct. Cl. 629 , which case the plaintiff contends is determinative of his right to recover. … This was the effect of the Correction Board determination which promoted plaintiff as of May 15, 1946. But in making such a concession the Board could not go back beyond that date.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Schmidt

    13 Ct. Cust. 252 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 21, 1925

    United States v. … United States v. Beierle, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 457 ; United States v. Von Bremen et al., 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 407 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • J-S-S

    26 I. & N. Dec. 679 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2015

    Dehn, Associate Legal Advisor BEFORE: Board Panel: NEAL, Chairman; GREER, Board Member; and O’HERRON, Temporary Board Member. … Review of Competency Determinations A finding of competency is a finding of fact that the Board reviews to determine if it is clearly erroneous. See Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99, 111 (1995); Maggio v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Spier Wines (PTY) Ltd. v. Ofer Z. Shepher

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 12, 2012

    Charrette Corp. v. … Further, unlike the facts discussed in the Board’s recent decision in Byer California v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Cady

    111 F.2d 899 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 29, 1940

    C. 228, 230, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia quoted from an important holding of the Supreme Court in Pearce v. Mulford, 102 U. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Shallus v. United States

    2 Ct. Cust. 456 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 12, 1912

    The board, in deciding the case, said: The protests were submitted simply upon certain official samples which were forwarded to the board. … See also United States v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 362 ; T. D. 31454).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • MacEntee

    203 Ct. Cl. 752 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1974

    Skaradowski v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 488, 489 , 471 F.2d 627, 628 (1973); Duhon v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 564 , 461 F.2d 1278 (1972). … Brenner v. United States, 202 Ct. Cl. 678 (1973); Clinton v. United States, 191 Ct. Cl. 604, 606 , 423 F.2d 1367, 1368 (1970); Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 (1953).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Garey v. Commissioner

    16 B.T.A. 274 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1929

    Again quoting from Noel v. … The petitioner attempts to distinguish Noel v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Commissioner

    36 T.C.M. 1755 · United States Tax Court · Dec 22, 1977

    Accordingly, we agree with petitioner. *21 5 In Brown v. … Indeed, the Board's decision in Brown v. Commissioner, supra , may very well have been subsumed by the Supreme Court's decision in Arrowsmith v. Commissioner , 344 U.S. 6 ↩ (1952) . 10.

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.