Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.70s

  • Brown v. United States

    150 Ct. Cl. 836 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1960

    Davis v. Woodring, 111 F. 2d 523 ,; Marshall v. Wyman, 132 F. Supp. 169 ; Olenick v. Brucher, 173 F. Supp. 493 . … Torti v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 214 ; Peyton v. United States, 120 Ct. Cl. 722 ; Holliday v. United States, 114 Ct. Cl. 702 ; Snauffer v. Stinson, 155 F. 2d 861 ; Van Horn v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    42 Fed. Cl. 538 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 8, 1998

    Brown v. United States, 32 Fed.Cl. 509 (1994). … Brown v. United States, 86 F.3d 1554 (Fed.Cir.1996).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Hatmaker v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 1, 2018

    Plaintiff’s burden is to show by “‘cogent and clearly convincing evidence’” that the decision of the board fails this standard. Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (quoting Dorl v. … E.g., Walls, 582 F.3d at 1368 (citing Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Van Slack v. Brown

    5 Vet. App. 499 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 21, 1993

    Romeo v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 388, 394 (1993). … Harder v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 183, 188 (1993) (citing Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 467, 473 (1993)).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    3 Cl. Ct. 409 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 20, 1983

    Hutton & Co. v. Brown, 305 F.Supp. 371, 402-03 (S.D.Tex.1969); United States v. … Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31 (1983). .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • SawStop, LLC v. Felder KG

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Aug 14, 2025

    Cir. 2012) (“[T]he mere fact that the Board did not recite all of the evidence it considered does not mean the evidence was not, in fact, reviewed.” (citing Plant Genetic Sys., N.V. v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    22 Cl. Ct. 211 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 21, 1990

    Plaintiffs, citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 , 92 S.Ct. 594 , 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972) point out that pro se plaintiffs are “entitled to minimal latitude in the presentation and preservation of their rights.” … Moreover, the court does not read Haines v. Kerner to mean that pro se plaintiffs may disregard the Rules by which all other litigants must abide.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown & Haley v. Commissioner

    21 B.T.A. 752 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 17, 1930

    A. 545; Model Dairy Co. v. Com missioner, 36 Fed. (2d) 768; Botany Worsted Mills v. United States, 278 U. S. 282 . … In determining the reasonableness of salaries the Board has considered duties discharged, responsibilities assumed, volume of business handled, capital employed, gross income, and net income.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    32 Fed. Cl. 509 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 28, 1994

    Pima Country Club appealed to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals, which, in its October 24, 1991 opinion, agreed with the BIA’s determination (Pima Country Club v. BIA, IBIA 90-109-A). … Corp. v. United States, 372 F.2d 1002, 1007 , 178 Ct.Cl. 599 (1967); Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31, 47 (1983).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    84 Fed. Cl. 400 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 16, 2008

    Brown v. United States, 271 F.Supp.2d 225, 227 (D.D.C.2003); Ptf.’s Resp. at 2. … Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1455 (Fed.Cir. 1997).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

    88 Fed. Cl. 52 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 22, 2009

    Co. v. … United States v. Brown, 441 F.3d 1330, 1362 (11th Cir.2006).

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Dennis W. Cogburn v. Eric K. Shinseki

    24 Vet. App. 205 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 13, 2010

    Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 123 (1993). In Walters v. … (quoting Cook v. Brown, 68 F.3d 447, 451 (Fed.Cir.1995))).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Rick K. Kahana v. Eric K. Shinseki

    24 Vet. App. 428 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 15, 2011

    See 38 U.S.C. § 7104 (d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … Nicholson, 21 Vet.App. 303, 307 (2007) (quoting Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 465, 469 (1994)); see also Jandreau, supra; Charles v.

    Cited 399 timesPublished
  • Mercer v. United States

    52 Fed. Cl. 718 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 21, 2002

    See also Wilson v. … Voge v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown Deer v. Commissioner

    86 T.C. 975 · United States Tax Court · May 19, 1986

    . • On April 1, 1979, Village of Brown Deer (petitioner), a municipal corporation of Wisconsin, issued $4,500,000 of General Obligation Storm Sewer Bonds (bonds) to finance the construction of proposed storm sewers and related

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    14 Ct. Cust. 96 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 1, 1926

    Schade & Co. v. United States, 5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 465 , T. D. 35002; Neuman & Schwiers Co. et al. v. United States, 4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 64 , T. D. 33310; Brown & Co. v. United States, 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 415 , T. … Nix v. Hedden 149 U. S. 304 . The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 20, 2025

    Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 779 (Fed. Cir. 1988) (citing Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57, 70 (1981)). … A correction board’s reliance on post-discharge employment to assess fitness is not unreasonable. See O’Hare v. United States, 155 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    1 Ct. Cl. 377 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1865

    This protest is signed by “Brown & Winchester.” Whether these are the Robert D. Brown and James Winchester who are claimants, is not alleged or proved. … The case of Ballard *380 v. Thomas, 19 How., 382 , appears to be decisive of the point in dispute.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    14 F. Supp. 520 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1936

    Brown v. United States, now pending in the Court of Claims of the United States, and the dismissal of said action with prejudice.” … Lang-Kidde Co. v. United States, 2 F.Supp. 768 , 77 Ct.Cl. 280 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    5 Cl. Ct. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1984

    See Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31 (1983). … See Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31 (1983).

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.