Case law

Moore v. Brown

10 Vet. App. 2 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 9, 1996

See Bazalo v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 304, 309 (1996) (en banc).

Yu v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 121 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 23, 1996

Yu v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 184, 184 (1995). … Kerr v. United States District Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 , 96 S.Ct. 2119, 2123 , 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976).

Brown v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 361 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1952

Cls. 724 ; and Jackson v. United States, 121 C. … Utah Power and Light Company v. United States, 234 U. S. 389 ; The Seminole Nation v. United States, 102 C. Cls. 565, 623 .

Stozek v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 453 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 1, 1993

1991); see Gilbert v. … Principi, 3 Vet.App. 310, 314-15 (1992) (Board required to adjudicate claim of clear and unmistakable error in prior BVA decision’s failure to consider all the evidence); Mata v.

Ingram v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 5 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 2, 1993

Ingram, appeals a July 23, 1990, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) which reopened appellant’s claim and denied entitlement to *6 service connection for a duodenal ulcer. … See McGinnis v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 239 (U.S.Vet.App. 1993). A determination with respect to a claim can also be revised based on clear and unmistakable error in a previous VA adjudication. See Russell v.

Barclay v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 161 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 3, 1993

See also Bell v. … Colvin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 171, 174 (1991). In Manio v.

Savage v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 520 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 20, 1996

On March 19, 1996, the Court affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision on appeal. On April 2, 1996, the appellant filed a timely motion for panel review. … a legal memorandum addressing the following issues: (1) If the continuity of symptomatology provisions in section 3.303(b) are construed as eliminating the need for medical nexus evidence in certain cases (see Grottveit v.

Walls v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 46 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 23, 1993

In Combee v. … The BVA is obligated to consider all issues reasonably raised by the record (see Myers v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 127, 129-30 (1991); EF v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 324, 326 (1991); Mingo v.

Brown v. Commissioner

41 T.C. 854 · United States Tax Court · Mar 19, 1964

The board of directors of West Coast voted to dissolve the corporation on April 28, 1953. … Brown President” relative to elections under section 4 (a) and (b) of the act.

Brown v. Commissioner

38 B.T.A. 298 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 10, 1938

This case and the case of Helvering v. Grinnell, 294 U. … Stratton v. United States, 50 Fed. (2d) 48, decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit some four years prior to the decision of Helvering v. Grinnell, supra, is squarely in point.

Balick v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 88 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 3, 1995

Balick, appeals a May 11, 1994, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision that he was not entitled to payment of compensation at the 10% rate from July 1, 1989, to February 1, 1990, for residuals of a back injury … See 38 U.S.C. §§ 7252 (a), 7104(a); Waterhouse v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 473, 474 (1992). Consequently, the appellant’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Jensen v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 333 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 30, 1996

Brown, No. 92-1260, Bazalo v. Brown, No. 93-660, and Burke v. Brown, No. 94-49. Jensen v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 364 (1995) (per curiam order). Recently, the Court issued its consolidated opinion in Bazalo v. … See Jurgens v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 197, 199 (1995); Golliday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 249, 253 (1994); Stillwell v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291, 298 (1994).

Bierer v. Brown

6 Vet. App. 563 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 22, 1994

See Employment Div., Dep’t. of Human Res. of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 878-91 , 110 S.Ct. 1595, 1599-06 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990); cf Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. … The decision of the Board is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Brown

4 Ct. Cust. 102 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 22, 1913

In this respect the case is precisely like that of United States v. Brown, supra. … See Chaffee v. United States ( 85 U. S., 516 , 539 et seq.). The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

District of Columbia Water and Sewer v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2021

On October 25, 1937, the Board of Commissioners of the Soldiers’ Home “convened a Board Meeting . . . to discuss the matter.” … (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000))).

Kuo v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 273 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 4, 1993

On August 4, 1992, the Court issued an opinion denying the motion of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) for summary affirmance, vacating the decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA), and remanding the matter … The Court stayed the case pending a decision in Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528 (1993).

Papa v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 327 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 25, 1993

But see Combee v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 248, 248-62 , (1993) (Steinberg and Kramer, JJ., dissenting from order denying en banc review). … See Suttmann v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 127, 137-38 (1993); Grottveit v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 91, 92-93 (1993) (whether a claim is well grounded is a question of law, which the Court reviews de novo). C.

Boeck v. Brown

6 Vet. App. 14 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 20, 1993

Colvin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 171, 175 (1991); see Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119 (1993). … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 91, 93 (1993).

Hood v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 553 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 28, 1995

This action is without prejudice to any timely appeal that the appellant may file from a final decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, should he continue to be aggrieved. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment.

Burke v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 376 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 15, 1995

While the appellant desired that the decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) be vacated and the matter remanded consistent with the remedy afforded in Grottveit v. … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 91 (1993), the Court deemed the agreement of the parties to have mooted the appeal.