Case law

Thompson v. Brown

6 Vet. App. 436 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 20, 1994

See, e.g., Grottveit v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 91 (1993), and McGinnis v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 239 (1993); but compare Sabonis v. … The decision of the Board is AFFIRMED.

McGraw v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 138 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 15, 1994

See Rightly v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 200, 206 (1994); Guimond v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 69, 72 (1993). … See Horowitz v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 217, 221 (1993).

Kern v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 350 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 10, 1993

It is not the function of the Court to determine whether appellant’s HIV was contracted during service, but rather to decide whether the factual determinations made by the Board constitute clear error. *353 Gilbert v. … See Rogozinski v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 19, 20 (1990). Moreover, appellant’s attorney is not qualified to provide an explanation of the significance of the clinical evidence. Esp iritu v.

Brown v. United States

358 F.2d 1002 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 15, 1966

In British American Tobacco Co. v. United States, 89 Ct. … In Wessel, Duval, & Co. v. United States, 129 Ct. Cl. 464, 466 , 124 F.

Gary v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 229 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 14, 1994

See, e.g., Holland v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 443, 446-47 (1994). … See Martin (Roy) v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 136, 140 (1993). The VA examination in this case properly addressed the issue of functional impairment.

Pepitone v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 31 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 27, 1995

The appellant’s Notice of Appeal (NOA) from an August 23, 1993, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision was filed on December 19, 1994, more than 120 days after the date stamped on the BVA decision. … In Davis v.

Brown v. United States

524 F.2d 693 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1975

Brown allegedly created the following “companies” solely for bidding purposes: B & B Construction Company, Horton Brown, Western Company, Horton J. … According to Chapter such specific supported demonstration of factual Board error the Board’s statement of facts will be accepted. Jefferson Constr. Co. v.

Ibeling v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 256 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 10, 1995

Brown, 8 Vet.App. 31, 33 (1995); Fluker v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 296, 298 (1993); Ashley, 2 Vet.App. at 311; see also Leo v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 28, 31 (1995). … See Blackburn v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 97, 100-101 (1995); Rosler v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 241, 246, 249 (1991); see also Stone v. INS, — U.S. —, —, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 1543 (1995).

Violet v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 530 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 26, 1996

In Kelly v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 37 (1996), a case which also involved Mr. Kabatchnick’s representation of a veteran, the Court addressed a similar factual situation to that presented here. … Telectronics Proprietary Ltd. v.

Brown v. United States

74 Fed. Cl. 546 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 15, 2006

Brown (“plaintiff”) is an inmate incarcerated at a United States Penitentiary in Pollock, Louisiana. … (emphasis added)); see Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997) (stating that Court of Federal Claims “lacks jurisdiction over tort claims against the United States”).

Salong v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 130 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 9, 1994

See Grottveit v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 91, 92 (1993); King v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 19, 21 (1993). … The Court reviews the Board’s findings of fact under a “clearly erroneous” standard of review. 38 U.S.C. § 7261 (a)(4); see Turner v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 256, 258 (1994); Stoner v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 488, 491 (1993).

LUIS

22 I. & N. Dec. 747 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1999

In support of its position, the Service cites to several cases, issued by both the Board and various circuit courts. See Mejia-Ruiz v. INS, 51 F.3d 358 (2d Cir. 1995); United States v. … Blaize, 959 F.2d 850 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 978 (1992); Aleman-Fiero v. INS, 481 F.2d 601 (5th Cir. 1973); Matter of Keyte, 20 I&N Dec. 158 (BIA 1990); Matter of Brown, 18 I&N Dec. 324 (BIA 1982).

United States v. Brown

6 Ct. Cust. 382 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 19, 1915

The act of 1909 authorized a protest within 15 days after the liquidation, and prescribed subsequent proceedings before the Board of General Appraisers and an appeal to this court. … A case cited by importer’s counsel is Bechtel v. United States ( 101 U. S., 597 ).

Wisch v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 139 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 14, 1995

Doran v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 283, 286 (1994). … The Court reviews the Board’s findings of fact under the “clearly erroneous” standard, so if there is a plausible basis for the Board’s determination, the Court will not overturn it. Id. at 287 (citing Gilbert v.

Pefianco v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 226 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 15, 1993

See also Hatlestad v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App 164, 169-70 (1991); Pritchett v. … Consequently, the BYA’s decision is inadequate to enable appellant to understand the basis for the Board’s decision, as well as to facilitate review in this Court. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104 (d)(1); Simon v.

Richards v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 255 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 15, 1996

See Horowitz v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 217, 225 (1993); Branham v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 93, 94 (1990). B. … See East v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 34, 39 (1995); Farless v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 555, 556 (1992).

Brown v. United States

131 Fed. Cl. 540 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 13, 2017

BROWN et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * Rails-to-Trails; Motion to Stay v. … See, e.g., CMAX, Inc. v.

Cochran v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 557 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 23, 1996

This Court has exclusive jurisdiction to review “decisions of the [Board]." 38 U.S.C. § 7252 (a) (emphasis added); Mayer v. Brown, 37 F.3d 618, 619 (Fed.Cir.1994). … See Cleary v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 305, 308 (1995). The appellant moved for reconsideration nearly 18 months after the final Board decision was issued.

Brown v. United States

396 F.2d 989 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1968

United States, 148 Ct.Cl. 420 (1960); Allin v. United States, 147 Ct.Cl. 459 (1959); Brown v. United States, 143 Ct.Cl. 605 (1958); Bowman v. United States, 142 Ct.Cl. 367 (1958); Friedman v. … United States, 168 Ct.Cl. 545 (1964); Nichols v. United States, 158 Ct.Cl. 412 (1962); Adams v. United States, 156 Ct.Cl. 289 (1962); Weiner v. United States, 148 Ct.Cl. 445 (1960); Brown v.

Chappell v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 384 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 18, 1993

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals a May 17, 1991, Board of Veterans Appeals (Board) decision which denied an increased rating for his service-connected post-traumatic stress disorder, currently rated as 30% disabling. … On consideration of the parties’ pleadings and the record on appeal, the Board’s decision is vacated and the matter is remanded for readjudication. See Hood v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 301 (1993).