Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.54s
6 Vet. App. 162 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 3, 1994
On November 16, 1993, a three-judge panel * affirmed the February 18, 1993, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. 6 Vet. App. 40 .
Cited 2 timesPublished7 Vet. App. 325 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 20, 1995
See Hayes v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 66, 68 (1993). … See Paris v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 75, 77 (1993); Colvin, 1 Vet.App. at 175 .
Cited 2 timesPublished46 C.C.P.A. 1 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 18, 1958
United States v. Brown & Co. et al., 10 Ct. Cust. Appls. 47 , T. D. 38295: Fish sounds, cut in half, washed and dried in the sun were-assessed as “prepared fish sounds.” … Brown and Co., 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 3 , T.
Cited 41 timesPublished8 Vet. App. 496 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 19, 1996
On July 7, 1995, the Court ordered the Secretary to file within 30 days a memorandum addressing the impact of Leo v. Brown, U.S. Vet.App. No. 93-844, 1995 WL 362583 (June 16, 1995) (opinion withdrawn Nov. 27, 1995). … Leo v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 410 (1995). The Secretary has yet to respond to the Court’s July 7, 1995, order.
Cited 1 timesPublished6 Ct. Cust. 415 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 6, 1915
In Rich v. … The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.
Cited 25 timesPublished10 Vet. App. 154 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 11, 1997
Bazalo v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 304 (1996) (en banc). Counsel also filed a motion for leave to file the motion for reconsideration out of time. … Bazalo, 9 Vet.App. at 309 ; Owens v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 65 (1997). As to the latter, the appellant made no statement that “he is eligible to receive an award.” U.S. Vet.App. R. 39(b)(1).
Reversed by Charles W. Bazalo, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 150 F.3d 1380 (1998)Cited 3 timesPublished9 Vet. App. 253 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 15, 1996
On April 17, 1992, this Court affirmed in part and vacated in part the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision on appeal, and remanded the matter for readjudication.
Cited 2 timesPublished9 Vet. App. 446 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 11, 1996
McTighe v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 29, 30 (1994); see also Walker v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 356, 359 (1995). … Hermogenes v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 75, 77 (1996). III.
Cited 2 timesPublished4 Vet. App. 148 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 29, 1993
In reaching its decision, the Board must provide adequate reasons or bases for its findings and conclusions. See Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … See Chipego v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 102, 102 (1993); Sheets v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 512, 515 (1992); Smith v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 137, 140 (1992).
Cited 2 timesPublished6 Vet. App. 75 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 10, 1993
Paris, appeals the October 22,1992, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which denied entitlement to payment of unauthorized medical services and entitlement to reimbursement under the provisions of the Home … . § 7104 (d)(1) (West 1991); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990). In the case at hand, the Board’s decision contains neither an analysis of the credibility or probative value of the evidence submitted by Dr.
Cited 2 timesPublished9 Vet. App. 141 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 14, 1996
Young v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 106, 109-10 (1993). On remand, the Board reopened the record and solicited a letter from Paul M. Cole, Ph.D, an expert on Swedish military history. R. at 414-16. In the letter, Dr. … In Manibog v.
Cited 1 timesPublished6 Vet. App. 11 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 15, 1993
Pollard, appeals a March 27, 1992, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) which determined that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen appellant’s claims of entitlement to service connection … Brown, 4 Vet.App. 353, 360-61 (1993) (Court declined to interpret the more expansive substantive provisions before the agency first interpreted the more restrictive provisions).
Cited 1 timesPublished4 Vet. App. 122 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 27, 1993
See Branham v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 93, 94 (1990). … provided its own medical opinion in violation of Colvin v.
Cited 3 timesPublished9 Vet. App. 22 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 26, 1996
Citing Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994), the Secretary asserts that clarification is necessary because the BVA is unsure of the course to follow. … In Chisem v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCarolyn Clark v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 15, 2022
Dec. at 3; see Stegall v. … Brown, 9 Vet.App. 266, 269 (1996) (holding that an issue was not ripe for review by the Court because the Board had not made a final decision on the issue). Because the Board remanded Mrs.
Cited 0 timesPublished9 Vet. App. 300 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 12, 1996
Eddy v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 52, 57 (1996); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 529 (1995). … . § 3.105 (a) relates only to review of RO adjudicatory decisions and not to those of the Board. Elkins v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 391, 396 (1995) (citing Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1521 (Fed.Cir.1994)).
Cited 2 timesPublished4 Vet. App. 316 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 3, 1993
See, e.g., Johns-Manville Corp. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 814 F.2d 697, 719 (D.C.Cir.1987).
Cited 2 timesPublished7 Vet. App. 138 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 15, 1994
See Rightly v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 200, 206 (1994); Guimond v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 69, 72 (1993). … See Horowitz v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 217, 221 (1993).
Cited 2 timesPublished5 Vet. App. 488 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 8, 1993
Brown, 5 Vet.App. 211, 214 (1993) (lay assertions of medical causation will not suffice to reopen a claim); Barfield v. … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 8, 9 (1993) (lay witness was not capable of opining “as to the medical cause of her husband’s death”); Grottveit v.
Cited 2 timesPublished6 Vet. App. 436 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 20, 1994
See, e.g., Grottveit v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 91 (1993), and McGinnis v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 239 (1993); but compare Sabonis v. … The decision of the Board is AFFIRMED.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna