Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.35s

  • Robert A. Athey v. the United States 9

    108 Fed. Cl. 617 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 30, 2013

    In addition, in a motion for a dismissal on the basis of subject-matter, the non-moving party bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction. Meyers v. United States, 50 Fed. Cl. 674, 680 (2001). … In so much as these laws are money-mandating, they are statutes that are also covered by the Tucker Act which waives sovereign immunity giving citizens the right to bring the claim.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Le v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 24, 2023

    However, he noted that “half of TM cases occur spontaneously without any clearly identifiable preceding event.” Resp. Ex. C at 6. He therefore dismissed Dr. Conomy’s and Dr. … First, the medical literature filed by Petitioner establishes that molecular mimicry is a well-known immune response in immunology that has been identified in medical literature as a mechanistic theory for how infectious

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • LeFever v. Commissioner

    103 T.C. 525 · United States Tax Court · Oct 26, 1994

    that the IRS “clearly was on notice of the fact that the election was invalid”. … Petitioners never clearly articulated their argument until the trial. The issue was not clearly raised in the pleadings, but the Court finds that it was tried by consent of the parties.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Camery v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

    42 Fed. Cl. 381 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 8, 1998

    Other physicians at the Children’s Clinic that treated Bobby adopted the diagnosis of “post-pertussis immunization perive-nous encephalitis,” or “post-immunization encephalopathy.” Id. … Guggenheim determined that Bobby’s medical records clearly indicated that Bobby was healthy until February 14, 1950. Dr.

    Cited 444 timesPublished
  • Pittsburgh & Weirton Bus Co. v. Commissioner

    21 T.C. 888 · United States Tax Court · Mar 16, 1954

    However, the establishment of a qualifying factor does not mean that the petitioner is automatically entitled to relief. … Assuming, arguendo, that such a claim is presented, the petitioner has failed to establish any qualifying factors other than those claimed to qualify it under section 722 (b) (4).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bent v. Commissioner

    87 T.C. 236 · United States Tax Court · Jul 28, 1986

    Although petitioner did not have an education degree, the board believed that, with his background and experience in the electronics industry, he was well-qualified to teach an electronics course at McKean. … established.

    Cited 85 timesPublished
  • Price v. United States

    133 Fed. Cl. 128 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 17, 2017

    ’s limited waiver of sovereign immunity pursuant to the Tucker Act. … (2) If such position does not exist, or with his consent, the employee shall be placed in a vacant existing position, or in a new continuing position, for which he is qualified,

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Aviation & General Insurance v. United States

    121 Fed. Cl. 357 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 26, 2015

    In 1996, amendments to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1605A, lifted Libya’s sovereign immunity for its state sponsorship of terrorism. Id. ¶ 25. … Thus, the Court declines to give weight to these cases in determining what qualifies as property under the Takings Clause.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. United States

    16 Cl. Ct. 690 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 28, 1989

    However, such obligation is conditional (as opposed to absolute) upon the availability of funds and the presence of a qualified debtor. … The statute of limitations within which one may initiate an action constitutes a limited waiver of sovereign immunity and therefore must be strictly construed. See Soriano v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Samish Indian Nation v. United States

    82 Fed. Cl. 54 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 27, 2008

    In sum, the Supreme Court held: Because the statutes and regulations at issue in this case clearly establish fiduciary *63 obligations of the Government in the management and operation of Indian lands and resources, they … As noted above, the Supreme Court found qualifying trust relationships in Mitchell II and White Mountain Apache Tribe, and the Federal Circuit found a qualifying trust relationship in Navajo Nation II.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Peters v. Commissioner

    21 T.C. 55 · United States Tax Court · Oct 15, 1953

    An organization devoted primarily to social ends does not qualify, but social welfare is a very different thing. The term “social” is narrow and primarily self serving. … The evidence clearly shows that the dominant purpose in establishing and maintaining the Foundation was to provide convenient swimming and recreation facilities for all persons residing in Cold Spring Harbor school district

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 10, 2014

    In order to receive compensation, the petition must be supported by either medical records or the opinion of a qualified physician which proves a causal relationship. See § 300aa- 13(a)(1). … Burris further stated that foreign substances cause antigens and that vaccines elicit an immune response and the production of antibodies. Id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blazavich v. United States

    29 Fed. Cl. 371 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 1993

    This is clearly reflected, and admitted, within the four corners of plaintiffs complaint, including attachments, and we so find. … Clearly then, plaintiff has failed to establish a claim upon which relief can be granted through any possible argument that the government has breached an implied contract of bailment with the plaintiff.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Hamza v. United States

    39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,687 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 13, 1994

    The Tucker Act alone does not create a substantive right to recover money, but instead waives sovereign immunity under specific conditions. United States v. … Accordingly, this court must consider whether plaintiffs letters collectively qualify as a certified claim. 1.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Spooner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 16, 2014

    IVIG “is used to treat a range of immune- mediated neurologic diseases,” including GBS. … As such, and for the reasons explained below, neither a lumbar puncture nor IVIG therapy qualifies as a “surgical intervention.” 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tiara Spooner, Parent of G.S., a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 16, 2014

    IVIG “is used to treat a range of immune- mediated neurologic diseases,” including GBS. … As such, and for the reasons explained below, neither a lumbar puncture nor IVIG therapy qualifies as a “surgical intervention.” 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alberta Gas Chemicals, Inc. v. Blumenthal

    467 F. Supp. 1245 · United States Customs Court · Apr 2, 1979

    Clearly, in *1253 the present case, plaintiff is not challenging a negative LTFV determination or a decision of the Secretary not to assess anti-dumping duties. … All other than the law of sovereign immunity remain unchanged.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Farrell Lines, Inc. v. United States

    667 F.2d 1017 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 4, 1982

    Sovereign Immunity As the Supreme Court instructed in Lynch v. … customs procedure; and (4) departed from established rules of appellate review.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mason v. United States

    461 F.2d 1364 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972

    The Cafoeman case is clearly distinguishable from the West case on both the facts and the law. … This is clearly shown by the following statements of the Court: * * * The purpose of the allotment system was to protect the Indians’ interest and “to prepare the Indians to take their place as independent, qualified members

    Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Mason, 412 U.S. 391 (1973)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Rohmann v. United States

    25 Cl. Ct. 274 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 11, 1992

    According to 26 U.S.C. § 6532 , 6 it is very clear that the United States has waived its immunity to be sued on a limited basis only. … In order to qualify for an exception under Rule 3(b)(2)(C), a plaintiff must meet each of the criteria set out in the Rule.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.