Case law

Wakeford v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 237 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 4, 1995

Frankly, we are dismayed that a Board decision in 1993 could so completely *240 ignore this question. While this Court reviews such determinations de novo, see Masors v. … Because the procedural posture of this case is so unclear, we decline to hold as we did in Stanton v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 563 (1993), that the Board’s error in not discussing the threshold issue of reopening was harmless.

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 553 · United States Customs Court · Jun 21, 1967

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

53 Cust. Ct. 295 · United States Customs Court · Oct 21, 1964

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of finger jointed molding similar in all material respects to that the subject of Best Moulding Corporation v. … United States (Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., Party in Interest) (51CCPA 7, C.A.D. 829), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 438 · United States Customs Court · Nov 7, 1962

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 466 · United States Customs Court · Dec 4, 1962

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 470 · United States Customs Court · Dec 4, 1962

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 581 · United States Customs Court · May 27, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 582 · United States Customs Court · May 27, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 315 · United States Customs Court · Jun 27, 1958

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v.

Nici v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 494 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 30, 1996

Evans v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 273 (1996); Cox v. … See e.g., Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 36, 41-42 (1994); Obert v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 30, 32 (1993); Rogozinski v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 19 (1990).

Brown v. Commissioner

36 B.T.A. 178 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 18, 1937

Brown, Inc.,- and therefore petitioner is not entitled to have the gain resulting from such transactions taxed at capital gain rates. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent..

Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 12, 2015

Co. v. United States, (No. 07-157C), 105 Fed. Cl. 420 (2012) and California ex rel. Brown v. United States, (No. 07-184C), 105 Fed. … Brown v. United States, 110 Fed. Cl. at 140). The Government has not “provide[d] any reason why that order may be reconsidered now.” Pl. Resp. at 11.

Green v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 83 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 3, 1993

On March 15, 1993, a three-judge panel * vacated the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which had reopened appellant’s claim and denied service connection, 4 Vet.App. 382 . Citing McGinnis v. … Brown, 4 Vet.App. 239 (1993), the Court concluded that appellant had not submitted new and material evidence and the BVA acted in excess of its statutory jurisdiction, authority and limitations, when it reopened the claim

Brown v. West

13 Vet. App. 88 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 13, 1999

Mayer v. Brown, 37 F.3d 618 (Fed.Cir.1994). The question whether we can decide what effect the August 1998 letter had on the finality of the Board’s decision has been decided by Blackburn v. … Brown’s] appeal” per VA Form 4597. Furthermore, the Court notes that the appellant had appealed three separate issues to the Board.

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 473 · United States Customs Court · Jun 5, 1962

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 430 · United States Customs Court · May 10, 1965

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of finger jointed molding similar in all material respects to that the subject of Best Moulding Corporation v. … United States (Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., Party in Interest) (51 CCPA, 7, C.A.D. 829), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 464 · United States Customs Court · Oct 21, 1965

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of finger jointed molding similar in all material respects to that the subject of Best Moulding Corporation v. … United States (Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc., Party in Interest) (51 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 829), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 434 · United States Customs Court · Nov 5, 1962

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 440 · United States Customs Court · Nov 8, 1962

Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 468 · United States Customs Court · Dec 4, 1962