Case law

Gregory v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2020

So long as the Board considered the relevant evidence and came to a reasonable conclusion, this court will not disturb the Board's decision.” Riser v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 679, 683– 84 (2011) (quoting Heisig v. … .”); Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1523 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (canons of construction apply to regulations, as well as statutes), superseded on other grounds by, 38 U.S.C. § 7111.

Higgins v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 389 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 15, 1995

Higgins v. Brown, 31 F.3d 1177 (Fed.Cir.1994). In a July 12, 1994, opinion, the Federal Circuit directed this Court to conduct further proceedings in accordance with Aronson v. … See Aronson v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 153, 159 (1994) (following remand from Federal Circuit, Court panel vacated single-judge order denying recusal and then sustained that recusal denial) (Aronson III). I.

Martin v. Brown

6 Vet. App. 272 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 3, 1994

See Tobin v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 34, 37-38 (1991). A payment of accrued benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 5121 is not a payment of a pension for a surviving spouse under 38 U.S.C. § 1541 (a). … Frankel v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 23, 25-26 (1990).

Murillo v. Brown

10 Vet. App. 108 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 26, 1997

In Rosier v. … Under the Court’s opinions in Patterson v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 362, 363-65 (1993) (partially overruled in Mayer v. Brown, 37 F.3d 618, 619-20 (Fed.Cir.1994)), and Romero v.

Yu v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 184 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 29, 1995

. § 7252 (b), review in the Court shall be on the “record of proceedings before the Secretary [of Veterans Affairs] and the Board [of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) ].” … In adherence to section 7252, the Court holds that a record that was before the Secretary or the Board should be before the Court as part of the ROA in the same form as it was before the VA.

Herrmann v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 60 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 10, 1995

Bullock v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 69 (1994) (per curiam order) (citing to Noyd v. Bond, 395 U.S. 683 , 695 n. 7, 89 S.Ct. 1876 , 1883 n. 7, 23 L.Ed.2d 631 (1969)); Erspamer v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 3, 7-8 (1990). … See Wick v. Brown, 40 F.3d 367, 371 (Fed.Cir.1994).

Morris v. Brown

10 Vet. App. 286 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 6, 1997

The purpose was explained in Roberts v. … In United States v.

Anderson v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 347 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 16, 1993

VJRA § 402; see Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528, 531 (1993) (en banc). … Williams (Willie) v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 270, 273-74 (1993).

Cathell v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 539 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 13, 1996

See Vettese v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 31, 35 (1994); Hatlestad v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 524, 529 (1993). … See Meeks v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 284, 288 (1993); Browder v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 268, 272 (1993).

Jennings v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 201 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 5, 1994

Jennings v. Brown, No. 91-1474 By an order dated July 26,1993, this Court vacated the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision on appeal and remanded the matter. … Buckley v. Brown, No. 92-866 The Court granted a joint motion for remand of Mr. Buckley’s appeal in a September 3, 1993, order.

Brillo v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 102 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 7, 1994

In Aguilar v. … Accordingly, we AFFIRM the Board’s decision.

Chelte v. Brown

10 Vet. App. 268 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 28, 1997

Bucklinger v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 435 (1993). … Caldwell v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 466, 469 (1991); see also 38 C.F.R. § 3.303 (b)(1996); Godfrey v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 398, 406 (1995); Falzone v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 398, 403 (1995).

Lauginiger v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 214 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 19, 1993

It would be up to the rating board to review the amount of radiation that the patient received and the relevance of this exposure in terms of his previous cutaneous tumors.... R. at 54. … See Combee v. Principi, 4 Vet.App. 78 (1993); 38 C.F.R. § 3 .311b(a)(2).

Smith v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 255 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 20, 1994

See, e.g., Yabut v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 79, 85 (1993); Spencer v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 125, 127 (1991); see also Lichtenfels v. … See 38 U.S.C. § 7104 (d); see also Suttmann v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 127, 133 (1993); Masors v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 181, 188 (1992); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990).

Neves v. Brown

6 Vet. App. 177 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 30, 1993

. *179 This Court summarily affirmed the Board’s decision on October 3, 1991. Neves v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 618 (1991) (table), appeal dismissed, Neves v. Derwinski, 965 F.2d 1064 (Fed.Cir.1992) (table). … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 362 (1993). The Court rejects the Secretary’s first and second bases for dismissal.

Manibog v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 465 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 4, 1996

Bagby v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 225, 227 (1991); see also Lovelace v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 73, 74 (1990); cf. Miller v. … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 545 (1993) (en banc) (Steinberg, J., concurring). The Board engaged in a fact-finding process, and then just applied the template created by the statute to those facts.

Tedeschi v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 411 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 8, 1995

. § 7261 (b); see also Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 36, 41 (1994); Sanchez v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 330, 333 (1992). … See Grottveit v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 91, 92 (1993).

Shogren v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 14 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 30, 1994

See Grottveit v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 91, 92 (1993). … See Grivois v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 136, 140 (1994) (quoting Espiritu, 2 Vet.App. at 494 ).

Pulac v. Brown

10 Vet. App. 11 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 3, 1997

When the appellant files a motion for reconsideration with the Board within the 120-day judicial appeal period, the finality of that BVA decision is abated. Rosler v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 241 (1991). … Wachter v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 396 (1995). Given that there is no final BVA decision in this matter, there is no appeal before the Court over which it could exercise its jurisdiction.

Goldman v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 20 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 26, 1996

On October 20, 1995, the Court issued a memorandum decision vacating the decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals and remanding the matter for further adjudication. … Hicks v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 417, 422 (1995) (where the record is inadequate, remand, rather than reversal, is the appropriate remedy).