Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.01s
Crutchfield v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
125 Fed. Cl. 251 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 8, 2014
This exam included a laboratory blood test; the results indicated that Petitioner was not immune to measles, had an “equivocal” immune response to mumps, but was immune to rubella. Pet. 1/16/09 Ex. 2 at 6, 9. … Under these circumstances, a petitioner must establish causation in fact, i.e., fust, by establishing a prima facie case offering evidence of sufficient facts to establish each element of the claim and then by meeting a burden
Cited 48 timesPublishedAuto Club Insurance v. United States
103 Fed. Cl. 268 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 24, 2012
As such, it is *271 an explicit waiver of the sovereign immunity of the United States. United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 398 , 96 S.Ct. 948 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976). … Otherwise, in Plaintiffs reasoning, the references to money-mandating statutes that are replete in such case precedents are merely a “shortcut expression” of the requirement of a money damages claim, which Plaintiff is clearly
Cited 4 timesPublished121 Fed. Cl. 87 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 5, 2015
The letter explained that income earned in ocean-based activity on international waters does not qualify for the foreign earned income exclusion. … Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co., 553 U.S. at 8 (determining that the language of section 6511(a) clearly states that taxpayers “must comply with the Code's refund scheme before
Cited 9 timesPublishedReading & Bates Corp. v. United States
40 Fed. Cl. 737 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 20, 1998
The regulations clearly contemplate the deduction of open accounts. See 26 C.F.R. § 1.166 -l(c). … RBX clearly had a right to demand payment on the promissory notes.
Cited 65 timesPublishedBarrett v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 2, 2017
Gershwin acknowledged: “Th-2 skewing has not been clearly demonstrated in human viral infections.” Exhibit 10 at 2.14 He provided two articles linking alum to “cytokine switches and specific immune responses” in mice. … Thus, petitioners have established that J.H.B.’s vaccines were a but-for cause and a substantial factor, acting in conjunction with his immature immune system and the mild virus, to cause his death.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHenry v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 27, 2022
He noted that no such antigens “have been identified” in this case, nor were any studies that would establish an immune mechanism performed. Id. … of the elements established by the Federal Circuit in Althen.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMission Critical Solutions v. United States
91 Fed. Cl. 386 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 2, 2010
As an 8(a) program participant, a qualified HUBZone small business, and the incumbent contractor, MCS has established that it had a “substantial chance” of receiving the award but for the alleged error in the procurement … Defendant argues: “[Although this provision clearly establishes the priority of these other contracting preferences, the HUBZone statute does not expressly provide that the HUBZone program be given priority over SBA’s other
Cited 11 timesPublished106 Fed. Cl. 507 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 2012
The statute clearly grants the power of mandamus only to federal district courts. … However, plaintiff has not established that a writ of mandamus is necessary or appropriate in this ease.
Cited 23 timesPublished53 Ct. Cl. 90 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 7, 1918
qualified and did not recommend him for promotion. … This is what we have done in this case, and it is established from the facts that the plaintiff was not advanced in grade or rank pursuant to law.
Cited 3 timesPublished13 I. & N. Dec. 35 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1968
Therefore, a petitioner with a business adminis- tration degree must clearly establish a particular area and occu- pation in the field of business administration in which he is en- gaged or plans to be engaged and must … qualified for or intends to engage in.
Cited 3 timesPublishedPender Peanut Corp. v. United States
20 Cl. Ct. 447 · United States Court of Claims · May 23, 1990
Section 702 acknowledges that the Tucker Act has already waived sovereign immunity for most money damages suits. Section 702 therefore waives immunity for actions seeking relief other than money damages. … First, the APA is not a waiver of sovereign immunity as to money damages suits.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBlackburn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 2, 2015
Whitesell’s opinion was itself somewhat qualified, conclusory, and not corroborated with any explanatory basis. … Chaudhry was better qualified than Dr. Steinman to opine on the nature and treatment of GBS and CIDP, and his testimony was more credible.
Cited 0 timesPublished119 T.C. 27 · United States Tax Court · Aug 8, 2002
The defendants asserted the affirmative defense of qualified immunity based upon having acted in good faith, and the plaintiff sought discovery of legal advice the defendants received with respect to his confinement. … established constitutional rights.”
Cited 9 timesPublished90 T.C. 802 · United States Tax Court · Apr 26, 1988
Therefore, no U.S. citizen who was paid by the United States and seconded to NATO could qualify for the section 911 exclusion. … Petitioner did not qualify for the section 911 exclusion during either of these years because he did not reside in a hardship area.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSantini v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2015
The admitting doctor, Natasha Fein, stated that “[t]he etiology of seizures is suspicious for adverse side effect of immunization, despite receiving 2-month immunizations without complications. … Omidvar have failed to establish the first prong of Althen and the Secretary has established an alternative factor. Although this resolution means that Mr. Santini and Ms.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSufi Network Services, Inc. v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 683 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 19, 2016
A board’s decision can be so grossly erroneous that one can imply bad faith, especially when the error clearly favors the Board’s department. Id. … Even more so, the specific actions taken by the Air Force were clearly not substantially justified.
Cited 6 timesPublished64 T.C. 331 · United States Tax Court · May 29, 1975
Aero clearly proceeded with due diligence to secure a determination for 1970. … The petitioner established that in approximately one-half of the determinations issued by the Phoenix office in similar situations in the years 1969 through 1971, the determination held the plan was qualified for the earlier
Cited 72 timesPublishedIsaac v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
108 Fed. Cl. 743 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 25, 2013
It was felt that immunization series had been the trigger for the development of Guillain-Barré.” … The Special Master, therefore, concluded that Petitioner did not qualify for relief under the Vaccine Act.
Cited 266 timesPublishedMarathon Oil Co. v. United States
56 Fed. Cl. 768 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 19, 2003
Thus, the language of the Federal Circuit’s opinion and judgment, both dated December 28, 2000, clearly state that the court was affirming the prior judgments of the Court of Federal Claims, not substituting its own judgment … But Marathon and Mobil have not established their entitlement to any such interest because they cannot demonstrate a waiver of sovereign immunity by the government.
Cited 1 timesPublished35 B.T.A. 901 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 20, 1937
term of office, it has been held that any compensation in addition to that fixed in advance was necessarily paid under special engagements for the performance of services outside of the duties of office because of the well established … While no rate of compensation was fixed, as in the Halsey case, the method was clearly ■to pay him on a quantum meruit basis by approving payment of fees to him after services were completed.
Reversed on other grounds by Commissioner v. Emerson, 98 F.2d 650 (1938)Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna