Case law

William R. Young v. Eric K. Shinseki

25 Vet. App. 201 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 24, 2012

See Godfrey v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 398, 410 (1995). It is well settled that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether the Board had jurisdiction to take the action it takes in a decision. See King v. … Brown, 10 Vet.App. 229, 232 (1997) (reviewing Board’s determination that claimant failed to file a Notice of Disagreement, such that the claim was not in appellate status).

Humane Society of the United States v. Clinton

44 F. Supp. 2d 260 · United States Court of International Trade · Mar 5, 1999

Brown, 901 F. Supp. 338, 341- 346 (CIT 1995) (“Humane I”). … See Humane Society v. Brown, 920 F. Supp. 178 (CIT 1996) (“Humane II”). This decision prompted the following actions on the part of the relevant United States government agencies.

Epps v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 341 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 27, 1996

See Edenfield v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 384, 390-91 (1995) (en banc). B. … See Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528 (1993) (en banc), aff'd, 39 F.3d 1574 (1994); see also Strott v.

Martin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 11, 2025

“The court does not sit as a ‘super correction board.’” King v. United States, 149 Fed. Cl. 272, 275 (2020) (quoting Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. at 331, 594 F.2d at 829). … .”); Van Cleave v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 674, 678–79 (2006) (While the court does not “serve as a ‘super correction board[,]’ Skinner v.

Boggs v. West

11 Vet. App. 334 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 21, 1998

Brown, 5 Vet.App. 229 (1993); Reonal v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 458 (1993); Guimond v. … Barnett v. Brown, 83 F.3d 1380, 1383 (Fed.Cir.1996); Butler v.

Tequila Cuadra S. de RL de CV v. Manufacturera de Botas Cuadra, S.A. de C.V.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · May 8, 2025

Citations to the appeal record are to TTABVUE, the Board’s online docketing system. See, e.g., Turdin v. Trilobite, Ltd., Conc. No. 94002505, 2014 TTAB LEXIS 17, at *6 n.6 (TTAB 2014). … Berger, 787 F.3d at 1377 (“[V]iewing the evidence as a whole, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion.”).

Parham v. West

13 Vet. App. 59 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 28, 1999

Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 123 (1993); see also Zimick v. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 271, 274 (1994) (noting that RO “must provide ... notification to the appellant of his or her procedural due process and appellate rights” (citing, inter alia, 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.103 , 19.25)); Hauck v.

Brown v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 413 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 16, 1993

Smith (Raymond) v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 335, 339 , (1993). … See Horowitz v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 217, 223 (U.S.1993).

Brown v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 307 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 2, 1993

Brown, appeals a decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) which denied a total disability rating based on individual unemploy-ability. … On April 19, 1991, the Board determined that appellant’s service-connected disabilities did not preclude him from obtaining substantial employment. Mitchell C. Brown, BVA 90-44977 (Apr. 19, 1991).

Scarbrough v. Brown

10 Vet. App. 207 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 24, 1997

He is the custodian of the record, and his duty is to provide a record on appeal which has integrity, showing what was relevant to the decision, whether that material is consistent with the Board’s conclusions or not. … See: 38 U.S.C. § 7252 (b) (review shall be on the record of proceedings before the Secretary and the Board).

Barna v. United States

127 Fed. Cl. 253 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 21, 2016

So long as the Board considered the relevant evidence and came to a reasonable conclusion, this court will not disturb the Board's decision.” Riser v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 679, 683–84 (2011) (quoting Heisig v. … The court does not sit as “a super correction board.” Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. at 331, 594 F.2d at 830; see also Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 782 (Fed. Cir.)

Robert H. Arneson v. Eric K. Shinseki

24 Vet. App. 379 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 20, 2011

Ashley v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 52, 56 (1993); see Clyburn v. West, 12 Vet.App. 296, 300 (1999). … Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 123 (1993). Here, Mr.

John R. Ramsey Et Al. v. R. James Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 16 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 31, 2006

See Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 539 (1993) (en banc). … Brown, 9 Vet.App. 389, 396 (1996) (quoting Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 11 , 82 S.Ct. 585 , 7 L.Ed.2d 492 (1962) (quoting Mastro Plastics Corp. v.

Brown v. Brown

8 Vet. App. 40 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 22, 1995

Brown appeals from a March 29, 1994, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which denied his request for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of disability pension benefits. James L. … See Francisco v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 55, 57-58 (1994), quoting Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 53 (1990).

Wilhoite v. West

11 Vet. App. 251 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 19, 1998

This Court is precluded by statute from including in the ROA any material that was not contained in the “record of proceedings before the Secretary and the Board.” 38 U.S.C. § 7252 (b); see Rogozinski v. … Simington v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 334, 335 (1996) (per curiam order) (quoting Bell v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 611, 612-13 (1992) (per curiam order)); see also Hulsey v.

Ardison v. Brown

6 Vet. App. 405 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 4, 1994

Brown, 5 Vet.App. 454, 456 (1993); Murphy v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 78, 81 (1990). In Green v. … Harder v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 183, 189 (1993) (sum of all the evidence “dictated” grant of service connection); Barnhill v.

Molloy v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 513 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 6, 1996

See Glynn v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 523, 528-29 (1994); Colvin v. … See 38 U.S.C. § 5107 (a); Suttmann v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 127, 138 (1993); Green (Victor) v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 121, 124 (1991).

KWUN

13 I. & N. Dec. 457 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1970

INS, 408 F.2d 35 (2 Cir. 1969) ; Chung Chan, Wa v. INS, 407 F. 2d 854 (1 Cir. 1969) ; Ngai Chi Lam v. … Justice Frankfurter, in the case of Anthony Pino v.

William C. Rickett v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 366 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 19, 2010

See Rios v. … Torres v.

Sparks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 15, 2026

.”); Van Cleave v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 674, 678–79 (2006) (While the court does not “serve as a ‘super correction board[,]’ Skinner v. … See Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. at 303; Prestonback v. United States, 45 965 F.3d at 1368. “The court does not sit as a ‘super correction board.’” King v.