Case law

John D. Rieser v. William A. Williams

255 F.2d 419 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 23, 1958

The decision in Andrews v. … A situation closely paralleling the instant one was presented in Brown v. Barton, 102 F.2d 193 , 26 C.C.P.A., Patents, 889.

HINOJOSA

17 I. & N. Dec. 34 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1979

Rosenberg v. F1euti, 374 U.S. 449 (1963), distinguished; Laredo-Miranda v. … See Laredo Miranda v.

Palafox Street Associates, L.P. v. United States

117 Fed. Cl. 324 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2014

Assocs., L.P. v. United States, 114 Fed. … Cir. 1988) (citing Zunamon v. Brown, 418 F.2d 883, 886 (8th Cir. 1969)). If the court determines that it lacks jurisdiction, it must dismiss the claim.

Harold L. Roby, Jr. v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 19, 2019

Tropf v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 317, 320 (2006) (quoting Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994)); see Pacheco v. Gibson, 27 Vet.App. 21, 25 (2014) (en banc). … Roby fails to demonstrate that the Board erred in denying entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 30%. See Hilkert v.

Townsend v. Smith

36 F.2d 292 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 19, 1929

Hien v. Buhoup, 11 App. D. C. 293; Kennicott v. Caps, 49 App. D. C. 187, 262 F. 641 ; Greenawalt v. Dwight (App. D. C.) 258 F. 982 . … Lindmark v. De Ferranti, 34 App. D. C. 445; Browne v. Dyson, 39 App. D. C. 415. Appellant, Townsend, filed his application for a patent in the Patent Office on January 13, 1922.

United States v. Wakem & McLaughlin

2 Ct. Cust. 411 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 11, 1912

D. 26988); Hempstead v. United States (122 Fed. Rep., 752); United States v. Hesse (141 Fed. Rep., 492). … McMullen v. United States (123 Fed. Rep., 847).

In re Stinson

154 F.2d 121 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 4, 1946

Its color is white or any “pale shades of yellow, green, blue, brown, or red.” Discoloration in the mineral by reason of impurities is lessened and the product rendered white by the process. … Ebers patent, the decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed.

Be Sport, Inc. v. Al-Jazeera Satellite Channel

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Aug 12, 2015

v. Al-Jazeera Satellite Channel Before Kuhlke, Kuczma and Adlin, Administrative Trademark Judges. By the Board: This decision concerns claim preclusion. … The Board liberally grants leave to amend pleadings at any stage of a proceeding, but will deny addition of a claim or defense that is legally “futile.” See generally Foman v.

Infiniti Information Solutions, LLC v. United States

92 Fed. Cl. 347 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 9, 2010

The parties referred specifically to two decisions by the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals — Dynamic Decisions, Inc. v. … Servs., Inc. v.

Reed International, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Apr 16, 2020

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Murphy, 823 F.3d 622, 626 (Fed. Cir. 2016). … Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. Murphy, 823 F.3d 622, 628 (Fed. Cir. 2016); see also Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v.

Anderson v. United States

22 Cl. Ct. 178 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 14, 1990

Sanders v. United States, supra, 219 Ct.Cl. at 302, 594 F.2d at 813. Under these circumstances, the court is bound by the Board’s determinations. … See also Crucible, Inc. v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 124, 130-31 , 591 F.2d 643, 646 (1979) (Attorney fees section of Civil Rights Act does not apply to tax refund suit in Court of Claims). See generally Brown v.

Stursberg v. United States

3 Ct. Cust. 370 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 14, 1912

The Board of General Appraisers classified the article as wrapping paper, rather than a manufacture of greaseproof paper. … The article was invoiced as “brown parchment cloth.”

Sothern v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 216 · United States Customs Court · Apr 8, 1954

Nix v. Hedden, 149 U. S. 304 ; Maddock v. Magone, 152 U. S. 368 ; Hartmann Trunk Co. v. United States, 27 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 254, C. A. D. 95. … It is rigid, hard, usually yellow or brown in color, can be made on any type of paper machine, and will not take a high finish.

11-11 363

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2015

See Bennett v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 178 (Vet. App. 1997). … See Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 259, 261- 62 (1994).

Houghton v. Commissioner

48 T.C. 656 · United States Tax Court · Aug 8, 1967

See Brown v. … The facts of mailing in the Brown case are identical to those present in this case. See also Cohen v. United States, 297 F. 2d 760, 772 (C.A. 9, 1962); and Luhring v. Glotzbach, 304 F. 2d 556 (C.A. 4, 1962).

In re Walling

228 F.2d 232 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 8, 1955

The patent to Sell discloses a food product comprising peanut butter to which has been added brown sugar, syrup, sorghum, honey or glucose in syrup form. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Jackson, Judge, retired, recalled to participate.

Application of Ralph C. Walling

228 F.2d 232 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 8, 1955

The patent to Sell discloses a food product comprising peanut butter to which has been added brown sugar, syrup, sorghum, honey or glucose in syrup form. … The decision of the Board of Appeals ■is affirmed. Affirmed. JACKSON, Judge, retired, recalled to ■participate.

Roberson v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 544 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 23, 2002

See Massey v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 134, 136 (1996) (per curiam order) (noting that Court will not address moot issue); Aronson v. … See generally Ebert v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 434, 437 (1993); Jones (Joseph) v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 596, 607-08 (1991).

Yu v. West

11 Vet. App. 453 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 25, 1998

See YU v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 184, 184-85 (1995) (per curiam order). … The appellant’s arguments notwithstanding, it is well-settled law that the Court must review a Board decision on the basis of the record before the Secretary and the Board, see, e.g., 38 U.S.C. § 7252 (b); Bell v.

Sharon E Brown v. Office of Personnel Management

Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 4, 2024

BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, PH-0845-19-0412-I-1 v. … See Russo v.