Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.53s

  • Guaranty Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    30 B.T.A. 314 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 4, 1934

    Brown, and my two sons, Oaxton Brown and Stanley Brown, in equal parts. … See also Greene v. Greene, 26 N.E. 739 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lundborg v. United States

    39 Ct. Cl. 23 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1903

    The Secretary convened a “board on additional unarmored vessels,” with power to examine all the plans and models offered and to report whether any of them were worthy of adoption. … (City of Memphis v. Brown, 2 Wall., 289 .) Here the proof of the element of value is too uncertain and inadequate to hold that the Government is pecuniaria liable for withholding the plans and specifications.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Darling v. Commissioner

    34 B.T.A. 1062 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 7, 1936

    Burnet v. Jones, 50 Fed. (2d) 14; Roberts v. Commissioner, 44 Fed. (2d) 168; A. Ten Eyck Brown, 19 B. T. A. 568; aff'd., 55 Fed. (2d) 1076; H. A. Underwood, 20 B. T. A. 1117; aff'd., 56 Fed. (2d) 67. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered v/nder Bule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • John D. Rieser v. William A. Williams

    255 F.2d 419 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 23, 1958

    The decision in Andrews v. … A situation closely paralleling the instant one was presented in Brown v. Barton, 102 F.2d 193 , 26 C.C.P.A., Patents, 889.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 23, 2015

    No. 10-360V Filed: February 2, 2015 Not for Publication ************************************* YAKETHA BROWN … * Petitioner, * * * Damages decision based on stipulation; v

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • BAEZA-GALINDO

    29 I. & N. Dec. 1 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jan 31, 2025

    Matter of D-, 5 I&N Dec. 728, 729 (BIA 1954) (emphasis added); accord Akindemowo v. U.S. INS, 61 F.3d 282, 285 (4th Cir. 1995) (noting the Board has “unfailingly” followed Matter of D-); see also Okoro v. … See Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 169 (1977). 4 We have sometimes referred to this type of situation—where one crime is committed in the course of, causing, or facilitating another—as a single criminal “episode.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Be Sport, Inc. v. Al-Jazeera Satellite Channel

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Aug 12, 2015

    v. Al-Jazeera Satellite Channel Before Kuhlke, Kuczma and Adlin, Administrative Trademark Judges. By the Board: This decision concerns claim preclusion. … The Board liberally grants leave to amend pleadings at any stage of a proceeding, but will deny addition of a claim or defense that is legally “futile.” See generally Foman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Endure Industries, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 23, 2026

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)); Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1365 (Fed. … Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 132 F.3d 724 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stanley L. Davis v. Denis McDonough

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 31, 2023

    See Laouini v. … The Board is obligated to provide fair process to appellants in the adjudication of their claims. Smith v. Wilkie, 32 Vet.App. 332, 337 (2020) (citing Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119 (1993)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anthony Salazar v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    2024 MSPB 11 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 13, 2024

    PFR File, Tab 1 at 7; see Kerr v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 908 F.3d 1307, 1312 (Fed. … Id., ¶ 6 (citing Yates v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 145 F.3d 1480, 1485 (Fed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 13, 2025

    In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-1287V ALEX BROWN, … See, e.g., Doe 34 v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 87 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Estate of Beckwith v. Commissioner

    55 T.C. 242 · United States Tax Court · Oct 29, 1970

    Brown, and Second Bank-State Street Trust Co., Trustees_18, 792 Crotched Mountain Trust — Edward P. Brown and Harry O. Gregg, Trustees - 4,100 Ada C. Symes, Trustee for Edwin L. Beckwith_ 8, 500 Ada C. … Between 1957 and 1964 the board of directors of Beckwith-Arden consisted of six members.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • 11-11 363

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 31, 2015

    See Bennett v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 178 (Vet. App. 1997). … See Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 259, 261- 62 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Griffin & Company Inc. v. The United States. Griffin Industries, Inc. v. The United States

    389 F.2d 802 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 19, 1968

    These three men constituted a majority of the board of directors of G&C. … Co. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Comm'r

    2012 T.C. Summary Opinion 5 · United States Tax Court · Jan 9, 2012

    Summary Opinion 2012-5 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CLIFTON GREGORY BROWN AND ALMA ELIZABETH BROWN, Petitioners v. … INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992); New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 440 (1934).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Palafox Street Associates, L.P. v. United States

    117 Fed. Cl. 324 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2014

    Assocs., L.P. v. United States, 114 Fed. … Cir. 1988) (citing Zunamon v. Brown, 418 F.2d 883, 886 (8th Cir. 1969)). If the court determines that it lacks jurisdiction, it must dismiss the claim.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Harold L. Roby, Jr. v. Robert L. Wilkie

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 19, 2019

    Tropf v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 317, 320 (2006) (quoting Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994)); see Pacheco v. Gibson, 27 Vet.App. 21, 25 (2014) (en banc). … Roby fails to demonstrate that the Board erred in denying entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 30%. See Hilkert v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stursberg v. United States

    3 Ct. Cust. 370 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 14, 1912

    The Board of General Appraisers classified the article as wrapping paper, rather than a manufacture of greaseproof paper. … The article was invoiced as “brown parchment cloth.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Wakem & McLaughlin

    2 Ct. Cust. 411 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 11, 1912

    D. 26988); Hempstead v. United States (122 Fed. Rep., 752); United States v. Hesse (141 Fed. Rep., 492). … McMullen v. United States (123 Fed. Rep., 847).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Infiniti Information Solutions, LLC v. United States

    92 Fed. Cl. 347 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 9, 2010

    The parties referred specifically to two decisions by the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals — Dynamic Decisions, Inc. v. … Servs., Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.