Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.75s
United States v. Beadenkopf Co.
8 Ct. Cust. 283 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 8, 1918
Crimmins & Pierce et al. v. United States ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 137 ; T. D. 35392); Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States ( 8 Ct. Cust. Appls., 104 ; T. D. 37221). … We do not lose sight of the fact that-some of the skins involved in the first Beadenkopf case are brown in color and if all of a major part of these importations were skins of that character, such fact might make against
Cited 4 timesPublished7 Ct. Cust. 338 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 21, 1916
On hearing before the Board of General Appraisers, the majority of the board held that the importer had not made out a case under this paragraph. General Appraiser Brown filed a dissenting opinion. … The decision of the board will be affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTimothy J. Urban v. David J. Shulkin
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 18, 2017
Brady v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 203, 206 (1993). Since promulgation of § 4.96 in 1964, the language at issue has not changed. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilliam Penn Hotel Co. v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 566 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 4, 1931
Brown, 4 B. T. A. 1129, where we held that the income resulting to a lessor from an improvement placed upon his property by a lessee was to be reported in full in the year the improvement was placed upon the property. … I am of the opinion, however, that the present decision is inconsistent with certain other decisions of this Board, with which latter opinions I do not agree. For example, we held in Gilbert Butler et al., 4 B. T.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 25, 2016
A lcski s Brown. fi led a petiti on fo r vaccine compensation on behalfof her on. … I H. under the ational V acc ine Injury Compensati on Program. 42 U. .C. § 300aa- I 0 to 34 (the ··vacc ine Program .. ).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCathleen E. Golden v. Sloan D. Gibson
27 Vet. App. 1 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 25, 2014
FACTS In August 2004, the Board denied Ms. … Vidal v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 488, 493 (1996); see also Baldridge v. Nicholson, 19 Vet.App. 227, 236 (2005).
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2017
App. 429 (1995); Elkins v. Gober, 229 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Madden v. Gober, 125 F.3d 1477 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Guimond v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 69 (1993); Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155 (1993); Caluza v. … Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (1995); Wood v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 190 (1991).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAtlas Mixed Mortar Co. v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 245 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 14, 1931
Brown et al., 18 B. T. A. 859; Southern Tire & Rubber Co., 18 B. T. A. 210; and Seabright Woven Felt Co. v. Ham, 38 Fed. (2d) 114, all of which cite the Ostheimer case with approval. See also Lucas v. … See Lucas v. American Code Co., sufra. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 2 timesPublished15 T.C. 195 · United States Tax Court · Aug 31, 1950
Jackson v. Smietanka, 272 Fed. 970 ; S. P. Freeling, 7 B. T. A. 1238; Edwin B. DeGolia, 40 B. T. A. 845; cf. Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 ; Astor Holding Corp. v. … Schaffner v. Standard Boiler & Plate Iron Co., 150 Ohio St. 454 , 83 N. E. (2d) 192. Petitioner places considerable reliance upon the case of Schneider v. Duffy, 43 Fed. (2d) 642. However, the facts in Schneider v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 17, 2017
See Johnson v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 7 (1996); DeLuca, 8 Vet. App. at 206. However, in Mitchell v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. … Van Hoose v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 361, 363 (1993).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished15 B.T.A. 1332 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 10, 1929
New York Real Property Law, §§92, 93; Personal Property Law, §11; Cochrane v. Schell, 140 N. Y. 516 ; Brown v. Richter, 25 .App. Div. 239; In re O'Reilly's Estate, 82 App. Div. 374 ; Steinert v. Steinert, 161 App. … Reviewed by the Board. Trammell dissents.
Cited 3 timesPublishedZinger Construction Co. v. United States
34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,411 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 30, 1987
Brown v. United States, 741 F.2d 1374, 1377-78 (Fed.Cir.1984). DISMISSED. Zinger Construction Co. v. United States, supra, 753 F.2d at 1055 . … Plaintiff has to meet a heavy burden in order to establish that, on the record before the Board, the Board’s findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Koppers Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown-Wysocki v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2024
Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: July 25, 2024 v. … , Petitioner, v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWillis E. Breland v. Robert L. Wilkie
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 29, 2020
Tropf v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 317, 320 (2006) (quoting Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994)). We now turn our attention to the regulation. … See Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1158 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Mr. Breland overlooks this point.
Cited 0 timesPublishedApplication of Harry Louis Yale
434 F.2d 666 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 10, 1970
The Board of Appeals affirmed that rejection. … The Von Bramer doctrine has been discussed by us at length on several occasions, one being In re Brown, 329 F.2d 1006 , 51 CCPA 1254 (1964), which is relied upon by appellant and which states (at 1010 of 329 F.2d, at 1259
Cited 8 timesPublishedTorsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusick
324 F.2d 1013 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 12, 1963
The board relies on three cases in addition to Senkus v. Johnston as establishing that independent corroboration of an inventor’s testimony is essential to establish an actual reduction to practice, namely, Thurston v. … Wulff et al., Reed v. Cislak et al., and Searle v. Glarum et al.
Cited 18 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2025
, etc., or was in violation of some other substantive right.”); see Brown v. … Cl. 1967); 17 see Brown, 396 F.2d at 991–92 (“We have also, since we first began dealing with disability retirement two decades ago, regularly considered evidence over and above that presented before the administrative boards
Cited 0 timesPublished140 F.2d 974 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1944
For explanation of this method of control, see Hillcrest Terrace Corp. v. Brown, Em.App., July 27, 1943, 137 F.2d 663 ; Lakemore Co. v. Brown, Em.App., July 15, 1943, 137 F.2d 355 ; Taylor v. … Brown, Em.App., July 15, 1943, 137 F.2d 355, 360 . See Armour & Co. v. Brown, Em.App., August 6, 1943, 137 F.2d 233, 239 . Cf. Todd v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 6 Cir., 1943, 137 F.2d 475, 479 .
Cited 16 timesPublishedGuitar Trust Estate v. Commissioner
25 B.T.A. 1213 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 21, 1932
We followed Blair v. Wilson Syndicate Trust, supra, in Wilson Trust, 20 B. T. A. 549. … Brown & Ives, Trustees, 2 B. T. A. 936.
Cited 7 timesPublishedJohn A. Cooper v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 18, 2024
Thus, in Breeden v. … Wick v. Brown (In re Wick), 40 F.3d 367, 373 (Fed. Cir. 1994).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna