Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.75s

  • United States v. Beadenkopf Co.

    8 Ct. Cust. 283 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 8, 1918

    Crimmins & Pierce et al. v. United States ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 137 ; T. D. 35392); Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States ( 8 Ct. Cust. Appls., 104 ; T. D. 37221). … We do not lose sight of the fact that-some of the skins involved in the first Beadenkopf case are brown in color and if all of a major part of these importations were skins of that character, such fact might make against

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Vandiver v. United States

    7 Ct. Cust. 338 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 21, 1916

    On hearing before the Board of General Appraisers, the majority of the board held that the importer had not made out a case under this paragraph. General Appraiser Brown filed a dissenting opinion. … The decision of the board will be affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Timothy J. Urban v. David J. Shulkin

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 18, 2017

    Brady v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 203, 206 (1993). Since promulgation of § 4.96 in 1964, the language at issue has not changed. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • William Penn Hotel Co. v. Commissioner

    23 B.T.A. 566 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 4, 1931

    Brown, 4 B. T. A. 1129, where we held that the income resulting to a lessor from an improvement placed upon his property by a lessee was to be reported in full in the year the improvement was placed upon the property. … I am of the opinion, however, that the present decision is inconsistent with certain other decisions of this Board, with which latter opinions I do not agree. For example, we held in Gilbert Butler et al., 4 B. T.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 25, 2016

    A lcski s Brown. fi led a petiti on fo r vaccine compensation on behalfof her on. … I H. under the ational V acc ine Injury Compensati on Program. 42 U. .C. § 300aa- I 0 to 34 (the ··vacc ine Program .. ).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cathleen E. Golden v. Sloan D. Gibson

    27 Vet. App. 1 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 25, 2014

    FACTS In August 2004, the Board denied Ms. … Vidal v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 488, 493 (1996); see also Baldridge v. Nicholson, 19 Vet.App. 227, 236 (2005).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • 11-28 606

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2017

    App. 429 (1995); Elkins v. Gober, 229 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Madden v. Gober, 125 F.3d 1477 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Guimond v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 69 (1993); Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155 (1993); Caluza v. … Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (1995); Wood v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 190 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Atlas Mixed Mortar Co. v. Commissioner

    23 B.T.A. 245 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 14, 1931

    Brown et al., 18 B. T. A. 859; Southern Tire & Rubber Co., 18 B. T. A. 210; and Seabright Woven Felt Co. v. Ham, 38 Fed. (2d) 114, all of which cite the Ostheimer case with approval. See also Lucas v. … See Lucas v. American Code Co., sufra. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Commissioner

    15 T.C. 195 · United States Tax Court · Aug 31, 1950

    Jackson v. Smietanka, 272 Fed. 970 ; S. P. Freeling, 7 B. T. A. 1238; Edwin B. DeGolia, 40 B. T. A. 845; cf. Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 ; Astor Holding Corp. v. … Schaffner v. Standard Boiler & Plate Iron Co., 150 Ohio St. 454 , 83 N. E. (2d) 192. Petitioner places considerable reliance upon the case of Schneider v. Duffy, 43 Fed. (2d) 642. However, the facts in Schneider v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • 10-29 125

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 17, 2017

    See Johnson v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 7 (1996); DeLuca, 8 Vet. App. at 206. However, in Mitchell v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. … Van Hoose v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 361, 363 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Francis v. Commissioner

    15 B.T.A. 1332 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 10, 1929

    New York Real Property Law, §§92, 93; Personal Property Law, §11; Cochrane v. Schell, 140 N. Y. 516 ; Brown v. Richter, 25 .App. Div. 239; In re O'Reilly's Estate, 82 App. Div. 374 ; Steinert v. Steinert, 161 App. … Reviewed by the Board. Trammell dissents.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Zinger Construction Co. v. United States

    34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,411 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 30, 1987

    Brown v. United States, 741 F.2d 1374, 1377-78 (Fed.Cir.1984). DISMISSED. Zinger Construction Co. v. United States, supra, 753 F.2d at 1055 . … Plaintiff has to meet a heavy burden in order to establish that, on the record before the Board, the Board’s findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Koppers Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown-Wysocki v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2024

    Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: July 25, 2024 v. … , Petitioner, v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Willis E. Breland v. Robert L. Wilkie

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 29, 2020

    Tropf v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 317, 320 (2006) (quoting Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994)). We now turn our attention to the regulation. … See Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1158 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Mr. Breland overlooks this point.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Application of Harry Louis Yale

    434 F.2d 666 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 10, 1970

    The Board of Appeals affirmed that rejection. … The Von Bramer doctrine has been discussed by us at length on several occasions, one being In re Brown, 329 F.2d 1006 , 51 CCPA 1254 (1964), which is relied upon by appellant and which states (at 1010 of 329 F.2d, at 1259

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusick

    324 F.2d 1013 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 12, 1963

    The board relies on three cases in addition to Senkus v. Johnston as establishing that independent corroboration of an inventor’s testimony is essential to establish an actual reduction to practice, namely, Thurston v. … Wulff et al., Reed v. Cislak et al., and Searle v. Glarum et al.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • White v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2025

    , etc., or was in violation of some other substantive right.”); see Brown v. … Cl. 1967); 17 see Brown, 396 F.2d at 991–92 (“We have also, since we first began dealing with disability retirement two decades ago, regularly considered evidence over and above that presented before the administrative boards

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bowman v. Bowles

    140 F.2d 974 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1944

    For explanation of this method of control, see Hillcrest Terrace Corp. v. Brown, Em.App., July 27, 1943, 137 F.2d 663 ; Lakemore Co. v. Brown, Em.App., July 15, 1943, 137 F.2d 355 ; Taylor v. … Brown, Em.App., July 15, 1943, 137 F.2d 355, 360 . See Armour & Co. v. Brown, Em.App., August 6, 1943, 137 F.2d 233, 239 . Cf. Todd v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 6 Cir., 1943, 137 F.2d 475, 479 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Guitar Trust Estate v. Commissioner

    25 B.T.A. 1213 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 21, 1932

    We followed Blair v. Wilson Syndicate Trust, supra, in Wilson Trust, 20 B. T. A. 549. … Brown & Ives, Trustees, 2 B. T. A. 936.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • John A. Cooper v. Denis McDonough

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 18, 2024

    Thus, in Breeden v. … Wick v. Brown (In re Wick), 40 F.3d 367, 373 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.