Case law

12-32 771

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2017

. § 4.14; Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 259, 262 (1994). … Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465 (1994).

Bobby G. Smith v. Eric K. Shinseki

26 Vet. App. 406 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 13, 2014

In McNaron v. Brown, the Court stated that it has the discretion to set aside any judgment in a case "where necessary to protect the integrity of its own processes." 10 Vet.App. 61, 63 (1997) (McNaron I). … Wilson v.

Paul G. Miranne v. Department of the Navy

2014 MSPB 42 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 12, 2014

both the issue of discrimination and the appealable action . . . .” 5 U.S.C. § 7702 (a)(1); see Brown v. … See, e.g., Meeker v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 319 F.3d 1368 , 1374 (Fed.

Paul G. Miranne v. Department of the Navy

2014 MSPB 42 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 12, 2014

both the issue of discrimination and the appealable action . . . .” 5 U.S.C. § 7702 (a)(1); see Brown v. … See, e.g., Meeker v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 319 F.3d 1368 , 1374 (Fed.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 24, 2026

Brown’s SIRVA-associated pain likely resolved before this long gap in treatment. Petitioner has cited to two cases in support for his claimed amount for pain and suffering, Danielson v. … Brown in this case. 5 Valdez v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 21-394V, 2024 WL 1526536 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Feb. 28, 2024), McGraw v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 21-72V, 2024 WL 1160065 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.

Wagner v. Comm'r

118 T.C. 330 · United States Tax Court · Apr 15, 2002

Corp. v. Lawyer’s Title Ins. Corp., 4 F.3d 605, 608 (8th Cir. 1993); Brown v. Hartshorne Pub. Sch. Dist., 926 F.2d 959, 961 (10th Cir. 1991); Robinson v. Willow Glen Acad., 895 F.2d 1168 , 1169 (7th Cir. 1990); Long v. … Board of Pardons and Paroles, 725 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1984); Cabrera v. Municipality of Bayamon, 622 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1980); Humphreys v. United States, 272 F.2d 411, 412 (9th Cir. 1959); A.B. Dick Co. v.

United States v. R. H. Macy & Co.

20 Cust. Ct. 395 · United States Customs Court · Mar 5, 1948

See United States v. Michele Diagonale, 22 C. C. P. A. (Customs), 517, T. D. 47497. In United States v. Graham & Zenger, Inc., 31 C. C. P. A. 131, C. A. … As was stated by our appellate court in United States v.

Ramos v. United States

683 F.2d 396 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1982

See Bell v. Brown, 557 F. 2d 849 (D.C. Cir. 1977) (30-day period not triggered by notice to attorney of record); Rea v. Middendorf, 587 F. 2d 4 (6th Cir. 1978) (same). … Compare Craig v.

United States v. Robinson

12 Ct. Cust. 145 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 3, 1924

States v. … v.

Linville v. West

11 Vet. App. 172 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 21, 1998

BVA reconsideration was not received by the Board on July 19, 1996. … Ashley v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 307, 309 (1992); see also Hill v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 246, 249 (1996); Davis v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 298, 300 (1994).

Pioneer Auto. Service Co. v. Commissioner

36 B.T.A. 213 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 24, 1937

A. 13; Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 , affirming 63 Fed. (2d) 66, affirming 22 B. T. A. 678. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 10, 2017

UNPUBLISHED **************************** DEBORA BROWN, * * Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; v … Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $150,361.19 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Debora Brown.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 11, 2026

See, e.g., Manetta v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 18-172V, 2020 WL 7392813 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Nov 19, 2020); Lyons v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. … Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.

Shaw & Co. v. United States

11 Ct. Cust. 226 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 13, 1922

—Brown v. Maryland ( 12 Wheat., 419 ); Almy v. California ( 24 How., 169 -173); Robbins v. Shelby County ( 120 U. S., 489 ). … The decision of the Board of General Appraisers must therefore be affirmed.

Roth Hotel Co. v. Bowles

144 F.2d 877 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1944

Labemore Co. v. Brown, Em.App.1943, 137 F.2d 355, 358 . Em.App.1943, 137 F.2d 663, 665 . 52 Stat. 16 , 12 U.S.C.A. § 1713 . Lakemore Co. v. Brown, Em.App.1943, 137 F.2d 355, 359 . Northwood Apts. Inc. v. … Equitable Trust Co. et al. v. Bowles, Em.App.1944, 143 F.2d 735 ; Buckeye Parking Corp. v. Bowles, Em.App.1944, 141 F.2d 692 . Lakemore Co. v. Brown, Em.App. 1943, 137 F.2d 355, 358 .

Ivan Concepcion-Maldonado v. Douglas A. Collins

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 23, 2025

(citing Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1158-59 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Urban v. … Cir. 2000) (reiterating that, because of the Board’s expertise, the Board, and not the Court, is responsible for factfinding). 63 Kutscherousky v.

Discount Co. v. United States

554 F.2d 435 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1977

Plaintiff then brought suit here to review the Board’s decision, and Trial Judge Browne has recommended that the administrative determination in favor of the Government be reversed. … Co. v. United States, supra.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 10, 2017

UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * Decision Awarding Damages; * Complex Regional Pain v … , ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 13-594V

John J. Batcher v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 26, 2019

Id.; see Hall v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 294, 295 (1993). … See Holland v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 324, 329 (1996) (holding that VA is bound by its own regulations (citing Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 539-40 (1959))); see also Cushman v. Shinseki, 576 F.3d 1290, 1298 (Fed.

Proctor Co. v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 535 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 6, 1925

In our judgment it is a case of undervaluation, and additional duties were properly assessed, .and the board properly overruled the protest to the assessment and the liquidation of the entry.—Fougera & Co. v. … The board had no jurisdiction in such matters under the act of 1913.—Brown & Co. v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 93 ; T. D. 40026). The judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.