Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.52s
564 F.2d 948 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 10, 1977
Frilette v. Kimberlin, 412 F.2d 1390 , 56 CCPA 1242 (1969). Horwath’s testimony, the board found, established an actual reduction to practice prior to November 17, 1969. … Brown v. Campbell, 41 App.D.C. 499, 501-02 , 1914 C.D. 170, 171-72 (1914).
Cited 16 timesPublishedMarlesa D. Lynch and Cynthia M. Martinez v. Robert L. Wilkie
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 23, 2018
Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 539 (1993) (en banc) (stating that the Court reviews "questions of law de novo without any deference to the [Board's] conclusions of law"). … Holle v. McDonald, 28 Vet.App. 112, 119 (2016) ("[T]his Court may not award equitable relief, no matter how compelling the facts."); see Moffitt v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 214, 225 (1997); Mason v.
Cited 0 timesPublished14 Vet. App. 269 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 12, 2001
Sandoval, 9 Vet.App. at 181 (citing Elcyzyn v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 170, 181 (1994)). … See Townsend v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 258, 260 (1996) (per curiam order) (citing Robinson v. U.S. Navy, 342 F. Supp. 381, 383 (E.D. Pa. 1972)); see also Brown (James L.) v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedRoger W. Wiker v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 12, 2023
Hanson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 29, 31 (1996). Generally, if a veteran does not appeal an RO decision, the decision becomes final. See Cook v. Principi, 318 F.3d 1334, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (en banc). … Best v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 322, 325 (1997) (finding that VA's failure to comply with notice requirements prevented a rating decision from becoming final). Mr. Wiker relies on this to argue for an earlier effective date.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHoward E. Chandler v. Eric K. Shinseki
24 Vet. App. 23 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 12, 2010
Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 540 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953) (Jackson, J., concurring) (“Whenever decisions of one court are reviewed by another, a percentage of them are reversed. … See Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 , 115 S.Ct. 552 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994).
Cited 2 timesPublishedBruce Moseby Brack v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 24, 2024
This Court "created what became known as the 'fair process' doctrine'" in Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 119 (1993). Sprinkle v. Shinseki, 733 F.3d 1180, 1185 (Fed. Cir. 2013). … Our Court first explicitly recognized veterans' right to fair process in Austin v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 547, 551 (1994).
Cited 0 timesPublished90 Fed. Cl. 210 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 5, 2008
United States, 161 F.3d 1372, 1376-77 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1454 (Fed.Cir.1997); Hart v. … North Dakota, 461 U.S. 273, 287 , 103 S.Ct. 1811 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983); Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d at 1316 ; Frazer v. United States, 288 F.3d 1347, 1351 (Fed.Cir.2002); Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev.
Cited 12 timesPublishedMichael A. Robinson v. Hot Grabba Leaf, LLC
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Apr 25, 2019
hue towards the apex of the leaf and a russet brown at the lower end. … Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHartford-Empire Co. v. Commissioner
26 B.T.A. 134 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 20, 1932
A. 1307; Berenice Brown, 25 B. T. A. 814. … Marr v. United Stales, 268 U. S. 536 ; Maytag Co., 17 B. T. A. 182; Plumber's Supply Co., 20 B. T. A. 459; Standard Silica Co., 22 B. T. A. 97; Athol Manufacturing Co., 22 B. T.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHutchinson Co. v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 367 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 19, 1928
Brown & Co., 9 B. T. A. 753; Keystone Coal & Mining Co., 10 B. T. A. 295; Palmetto Coal Co., 11 B. T. A. 154; Whitehouse Leather Products Co., 12 B. T. A. 714; Louisville Veneer Mills, 12 B. T. A. 1352; C. A. … See United States v. Updike, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLouisville Veneer Mills v. Commissioner
12 B.T.A. 1352 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 16, 1928
The Board has already considered this question in a number of cases and decided the same adversely to the contention of the respondent. Fred T. Ley & Co., 9 B. T. A. 749; M. Brown & Co., 9 B. T.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 9, 2018
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-0303V Filed: October 2, 2017 UNPUBLISHED LORA BELLE BROWN … Leah V. Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Lara A. Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFred Johnson v. Department of Veterans Affairs
2014 MSPB 82 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 30, 2014
appeal in Johnson v. … See Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished108 F. Supp. 382 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952
Jones, Chief Judge, dissenting: I would defer action on these motions until the Loyalty Review Board has finally passed upon the plaintiffs’ removal under the standards laid down in Executive Order No. 10241. … Brown, $2,795.44; Joseph W. B. Clark, $3,897.91; Isadore N. Cohen, $3,536.80; Arthur L. Drayton, $2,759.74; Horace E. Elkins, $1,535.41; Clarence H. Haughton, $3,805.57; Lee Jackson, $3,297.39; Harold C.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCarroll B. Westfall v. Robert A. McDonald
27 Vet. App. 341 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 28, 2015
For this proposition, he relies primarily on Strouth v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 502, 504 (1996), as well as Mariano v. Principi, 18 Vet.App. 217 (2004), and Luyster v. Principi, 16 Vet.App. 96 (2002). … See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, ____, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 2632, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993); Stillwell v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291, 300 (1994).
Cited 3 timesPublished13 Cl. Ct. 741 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 24, 1987
Soriano v. United States, 352 U.S. 270, 273-74 , 77 S.Ct. 269, 271-72 , 1 L.Ed.2d 306 (1957); Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.Cl. 1, 310 F.2d 381 , cert. denied, 373 U.S. 932 , 83 S.Ct. 1540 , 10 L.Ed.2d 691 (1963).” … Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31, 41 (1983). This rule prevents a party from subsequently litigating the same claim arising out of the same transactional facts yet based on a different cause of action.
Cited 12 timesPublished558 F.2d 994 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 8, 1977
Div. v. United States, 212 Ct. … General Dynamics Corp. v. United States, post at 607; H. R. Henderson & Co. v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 228 (1965); sec also William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. United States, 205 Ct.
Cited 11 timesPublished30 B.T.A. 908 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 14, 1934
Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 . There have been several cases somewhat close to this on the facts. In Philip C. … [Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the petitioner.
Cited 4 timesPublishedEmpire State Finance Corp. v. Commissioner
6 B.T.A. 1322 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 12, 1927
Jones, Burt Brown Barker, and W. H. Tucker, as voting trustees. … The Board of Directors shall consist of seven members.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLittle v. District of Columbia
19 Ct. Cl. 323 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 24, 1884
This was so held by this court in Roche v. The District of Columbia, ( 18 C. Cls. R. 217 ), which was just such a case as this. 3. … And again, in Brown v. The District of Columbia ( 17 C. Cls.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna