Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.81s

  • Robinson v. Peake

    22 Vet. App. 381 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 27, 2009

    to the Board’s decision.”); Link v. … When the Board issued its decision in May 2004, theories of ser *384 vice connection were considered to be separate and distinct claims. See Perman v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 237, 239 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Herman L. Loving , Jr. v. R. James Nicholson

    19 Vet. App. 96 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 29, 2005

    LOVING , JR., APPELLANT , V. R. … In his brief, the Secretary, citing to Sweitzer v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 503 (1993), counters that "the conclusion is inescapable that Mr. Loving's claim . . . is improvident under the law." Secretary's Br. at 7.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 12, 2020

    , Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: May 12, 2020 v. … , Petitioner, V.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Larry W. Mattox v. Denis McDonough

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 26, 2021

    Shalala, 508 U.S. 402 (1993); Goodman v. Shulkin, 870 F.3d 1383, 1386 (Fed. Cir. 2017). 31 Tropf v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 317, 320 (2006) (quoting Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994)); see also Kisor v. … .78 In short, the Board performed its function as 73 See Locklear v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lemelson v. United States

    3 Cl. Ct. 161 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 26, 1983

    In Price v. … Ellis v. Carter, 328 F.2d 573 (9th Cir.1964). In Ellis v.

    Vacated in part by Jerome H. Lemelson v. The United States, the Bendix Corporation and Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company, Third-Party, 752 F.2d 1538 (1985)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jorge R. Munoz v. Department of Homeland Security

    2014 MSPB 66 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 20, 2014

    See Buelna v. … Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Seaborg

    328 F.2d 998 · United States Customs Court · Mar 19, 1964

    This court affirmed the action of the board and summarized the position of the examiner and the board in the following language (37 CCPA at 1105): Both the Primary Examiner and the board were of the opinion that Brown-lee … The Supreme Court, in United Carton Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Osborn v. United States

    47 Fed. Cl. 224 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2000

    Brown v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 227, 229 (1993) (citing Block v. North Dakota ex rel. … (table), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1117 , 119 S.Ct. 1766 , 143 L.Ed.2d 796 (1999); see also Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Bevel. Co. v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • United States v. Hoyt

    16 Ct. Cust. 502 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 16, 1929

    It varies in color from yellow to a rich red brown, is remarkably hard and fine grained, and takes a high polish. … Hampton, jr., & Co. v. United, States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 490 , T. D. 40695; Smith v. United States, 143 Fed. 691 ; United States v. Walter, 4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 95 , T. D. 33371; McEnany v. United States, 8 Ct. Cust.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Barnard v. District of Columbia

    20 Ct. Cl. 257 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1885

    It appears that in some cases like the present the Board of Public Works did allow and pay contractors the board rate for rock excavations. … The claimant was thus overpaid by Board of Audit on that account the sum of $1,519.07. (Neitzey’s Case, 17 C. Cls. R., 101 ; Brown’s Case, 17 C. Cls. R., 420.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • August Guyer, Pascal Matile, Ernst Peterhans and Werner Zollinger v. Charles Robert Cramer, Hans-Peter Meyer and Walter Feist

    318 F.2d 757 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 20, 1963

    The board in its opinion admitted that. … See Binstead et al. v. Littmann et al., 44 CCPA 839, 242 F.2d 766 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • J-W-S

    24 I. & N. Dec. 185 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2007

    ) Lin v. … INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, supra; Huang v. U.S.

    Cited 233 timesPublished
  • William S. Gray & Co. v. United States

    68 Ct. Cl. 480 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1929

    The Board of Tax Appeals set aside the disallowance and allowed 217%. *499 In Livingston & Co. v. United States, 67 C. … A. 628, 69% allowed by commissioner, approved ¡by board; Brown & Brown, Inc., 10 B. T. A. 106, 67% allowed by commissioner, approved by board; Strayer’s Business College, 10 B. T.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Marcos Greenidge v. Denis McDonough

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 31, 2024

    Without an NOD, the Board had no authority to consider the matter. See 38 U.S.C. § 7105(a) ("Appellate review shall be initiated by the filing of a notice of disagreement."); Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1159 (Fed. … See generally Best v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 322 (1997).) Mr. Burkhardt never appealed or otherwise challenged the Court's resolution of the principal phase of his appeal. But he did seek an EAJA award.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 27, 2020

    k.1 lt hcm; ')v,tcrn). B urL',IU i' S Dq13rtmc:nt of .Ju., t1n: ~ ·.s DqMI,lll..: Jll ol H,:ai th i' 0. … , 20~ I <1 I(,_ ,t,6.5 Rod,v1 I k. \ ,11} 20X " - DatcJ ;)-/'iYS'/ ;>V

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 25, 2020

    Administration (SIRVA) Summer Pope Abel, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. … , Petitioner, v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Barney O. Padgett v. James B. Peake

    22 Vet. App. 159 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 8, 2008

    In May 2005, the Secretary filed his pending motion, under Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994), to withdraw the Full Court Opinion, vacate the underlying Board decision, and dismiss Mr. Padgett's appeal as moot. Mr. … See Hicks v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 417, 422 (1995); see also Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 53 (1990).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Marvin Robinson v. James B. Peake

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 3, 2008

    Brown, 6 Vet.App. 396, 402 (1994). … Such a remand would "'unnecessarily impos[e] additional burdens on the [Board] and . . . VA with no benefit flowing to the veteran.'" Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 426, 430 (1994) (quoting Soyini v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Austin v. United States

    1 Ct. Cust. 465 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 10, 1911

    of the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals in Austin, Nichols & Co. v. … Thereafter the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the case of Kimpton v. United States (171 Fed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Angell v. Angell

    69 F.2d 646 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 2, 1934

    Schuster v. Brown, 21 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 932, 69 F. (2d) 373; Marshall & Levandosky v. Ledwinka, 21 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 728, 67 F. (2d) 495. … Gowen v. Hendry, 17 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 789, 37 F. (2d) 426.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.