Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.97s

  • Commissioning Solutions Global, LLC

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 7, 2014

    Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2013). … This Board, of course, has no jurisdiction over bid protests. Coastal Corp. v. United States, 713 F.2d 728, 730 (Fed. Cir. 1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Preston Lee Dent v. Robert A. McDonald

    27 Vet. App. 362 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 15, 2015

    . § 1503 ; Martin v. Brown, 7 Vet. … Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed.Cir.1996) (table).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Louis R. Frantzis v. Denis McDonough

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 21, 2022

    The Board cannot secure evidence "to support a predetermined outcome." Id. 157 Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 384, 394 (1993); Marsh v. West, 11 Vet.App. 468, 471-72 (1998). 158 Young v. … Brown, 513 U.S.115, 118 (1994); Osman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marcos Greenidge v. Denis McDonough

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 31, 2024

    Without an NOD, the Board had no authority to consider the matter. See 38 U.S.C. § 7105(a) ("Appellate review shall be initiated by the filing of a notice of disagreement."); Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1159 (Fed. … See generally Best v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 322 (1997).) Mr. Burkhardt never appealed or otherwise challenged the Court's resolution of the principal phase of his appeal. But he did seek an EAJA award.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alda v. Bedford v. Wilson P. Boothroyd and Edgar M. Creamer, Jr.

    319 F.2d 200 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 20, 1963

    Appellant has appealed from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences, adhered to on reconsideration, which awarded priority of invention to the appellees. The appellant, Alda V. … Scudder, 1897 CD 724 to Bac v. Loomis [ 252 F.2d 571 ], 45 GCPA 807; 117 USPQ 29 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 12, 2020

    States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-0409V (not to be published) MYRA BROWN … , Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • William S. Gray & Co. v. United States

    68 Ct. Cl. 480 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1929

    The Board of Tax Appeals set aside the disallowance and allowed 217%. *499 In Livingston & Co. v. United States, 67 C. … A. 628, 69% allowed by commissioner, approved ¡by board; Brown & Brown, Inc., 10 B. T. A. 106, 67% allowed by commissioner, approved by board; Strayer’s Business College, 10 B. T.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Angell v. Angell

    69 F.2d 646 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 2, 1934

    Schuster v. Brown, 21 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 932, 69 F. (2d) 373; Marshall & Levandosky v. Ledwinka, 21 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 728, 67 F. (2d) 495. … Gowen v. Hendry, 17 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 789, 37 F. (2d) 426.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Larry J. Urquhart v. R. James Nicholson

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 30, 2005

    He also argues that his submission was timely under 38 C.F.R. § 20.1304(a) and our decisions in Sims v. West, 11 Vet.App. 237 (1998), and Losh v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 87 (1993). … before the Secretary and the Board." 38 U.S.C. § 7252(b); see Rogozinski v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 26, 2020

    , Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. … Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Leonard v. United States

    7 F. Supp. 295 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1934

    Brown v. Helvering, 201 U. S. 193 , 54 S. Ct. 356 , 78 L. Ed. 725 . On the other hand trade discounts are held to be deductible. … Spring City Foundry Co. v. Commissioner, 54 S. Ct. 644 , 78 L. Ed. 1200 , decided by the Supreme Court April 30, 1934.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Alvin Demery v. R Obert L. W Ilkie

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 17, 2019

    Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994), and the Federal Circuit's Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236 (Fed. … We note that Kelsey also relied on Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 330 (1997) and Swanson v. West, 13 Vet.App. 197 (1999). Id. These cases also no longer support Kelsey.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Moeller

    117 F.2d 565 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 24, 1941

    The District Court in Bituminous Products Co. et al. v. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Damon Brown v. Department of Defense

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 29, 2022

    BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, CH-0752-10-0294-M-1 v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the Board’s final decision sustaining the appellant’s removal and remanded the appeal to the Board for further proceedings. See Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • BLR Group of America, Inc. v. United States

    94 Fed. Cl. 354 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 2010

    Brown-Leiker, and other Air Force personnel. Compl. ¶ 46. … Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243 (Fed.Cir.1996).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Meyer v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 44 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 14, 1932

    A stock dividend being constitutionally free from tax, Eisner v. Maeom'ber, 252 ü. … Reviewed by the BoaRd. Judgment will be entered under Rule SO.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jorge R. Munoz v. Department of Homeland Security

    2014 MSPB 66 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 20, 2014

    See Buelna v. … Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • SINGH

    24 I. & N. Dec. 331 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2007

    Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000). We must look to see whether the regulation harmonizes with the plain language of the statute. See Nat’l Muffler Dealers Ass’n, Inc. v. … The Board has broad discretion to deny a motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992); INS v. Rios-Pineda, 471 U.S. 444 (1985).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McEnany v. United States

    8 Ct. Cust. 329 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 20, 1918

    The protest was submitted upon testimony to the Board of General Appraisers, and was overruled by a majority decision of the board. The importer appeals. … C. 87 Fed., 863 (Aff.); Matheson & Co. v. United States, 90 Fed., 275 (oil of mirbane); *332 United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co., 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 378 ; T. D. 32967 (ladder tapes); (Henderson & Hall v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Giant Furniture Co. v. United States

    9 F. Supp. 585 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1935

    But. since the decision in Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 , 54 S. Ct. 356, 359 , 78 L. … In Brown v. Helvering, the method of the .taxpayer was approved.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.