Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.97s
Commissioning Solutions Global, LLC
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 7, 2014
Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2013). … This Board, of course, has no jurisdiction over bid protests. Coastal Corp. v. United States, 713 F.2d 728, 730 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPreston Lee Dent v. Robert A. McDonald
27 Vet. App. 362 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 15, 2015
. § 1503 ; Martin v. Brown, 7 Vet. … Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed.Cir.1996) (table).
Cited 6 timesPublishedLouis R. Frantzis v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 21, 2022
The Board cannot secure evidence "to support a predetermined outcome." Id. 157 Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 384, 394 (1993); Marsh v. West, 11 Vet.App. 468, 471-72 (1998). 158 Young v. … Brown, 513 U.S.115, 118 (1994); Osman v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMarcos Greenidge v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 31, 2024
Without an NOD, the Board had no authority to consider the matter. See 38 U.S.C. § 7105(a) ("Appellate review shall be initiated by the filing of a notice of disagreement."); Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1159 (Fed. … See generally Best v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 322 (1997).) Mr. Burkhardt never appealed or otherwise challenged the Court's resolution of the principal phase of his appeal. But he did seek an EAJA award.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlda v. Bedford v. Wilson P. Boothroyd and Edgar M. Creamer, Jr.
319 F.2d 200 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 20, 1963
Appellant has appealed from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences, adhered to on reconsideration, which awarded priority of invention to the appellees. The appellant, Alda V. … Scudder, 1897 CD 724 to Bac v. Loomis [ 252 F.2d 571 ], 45 GCPA 807; 117 USPQ 29 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 12, 2020
States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-0409V (not to be published) MYRA BROWN … , Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWilliam S. Gray & Co. v. United States
68 Ct. Cl. 480 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1929
The Board of Tax Appeals set aside the disallowance and allowed 217%. *499 In Livingston & Co. v. United States, 67 C. … A. 628, 69% allowed by commissioner, approved ¡by board; Brown & Brown, Inc., 10 B. T. A. 106, 67% allowed by commissioner, approved by board; Strayer’s Business College, 10 B. T.
Cited 2 timesPublished69 F.2d 646 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 2, 1934
Schuster v. Brown, 21 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 932, 69 F. (2d) 373; Marshall & Levandosky v. Ledwinka, 21 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 728, 67 F. (2d) 495. … Gowen v. Hendry, 17 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 789, 37 F. (2d) 426.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLarry J. Urquhart v. R. James Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 30, 2005
He also argues that his submission was timely under 38 C.F.R. § 20.1304(a) and our decisions in Sims v. West, 11 Vet.App. 237 (1998), and Losh v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 87 (1993). … before the Secretary and the Board." 38 U.S.C. § 7252(b); see Rogozinski v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 26, 2020
, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. … Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished7 F. Supp. 295 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1934
Brown v. Helvering, 201 U. S. 193 , 54 S. Ct. 356 , 78 L. Ed. 725 . On the other hand trade discounts are held to be deductible. … Spring City Foundry Co. v. Commissioner, 54 S. Ct. 644 , 78 L. Ed. 1200 , decided by the Supreme Court April 30, 1934.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAlvin Demery v. R Obert L. W Ilkie
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 17, 2019
Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994), and the Federal Circuit's Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236 (Fed. … We note that Kelsey also relied on Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 330 (1997) and Swanson v. West, 13 Vet.App. 197 (1999). Id. These cases also no longer support Kelsey.
Cited 0 timesPublished117 F.2d 565 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 24, 1941
The District Court in Bituminous Products Co. et al. v. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDamon Brown v. Department of Defense
Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 29, 2022
BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, CH-0752-10-0294-M-1 v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the Board’s final decision sustaining the appellant’s removal and remanded the appeal to the Board for further proceedings. See Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBLR Group of America, Inc. v. United States
94 Fed. Cl. 354 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 2010
Brown-Leiker, and other Air Force personnel. Compl. ¶ 46. … Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243 (Fed.Cir.1996).
Cited 10 timesPublished27 B.T.A. 44 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 14, 1932
A stock dividend being constitutionally free from tax, Eisner v. Maeom'ber, 252 ü. … Reviewed by the BoaRd. Judgment will be entered under Rule SO.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJorge R. Munoz v. Department of Homeland Security
2014 MSPB 66 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 20, 2014
See Buelna v. … Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublished24 I. & N. Dec. 331 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2007
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000). We must look to see whether the regulation harmonizes with the plain language of the statute. See Nat’l Muffler Dealers Ass’n, Inc. v. … The Board has broad discretion to deny a motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992); INS v. Rios-Pineda, 471 U.S. 444 (1985).
Cited 7 timesPublished8 Ct. Cust. 329 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 20, 1918
The protest was submitted upon testimony to the Board of General Appraisers, and was overruled by a majority decision of the board. The importer appeals. … C. 87 Fed., 863 (Aff.); Matheson & Co. v. United States, 90 Fed., 275 (oil of mirbane); *332 United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co., 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 378 ; T. D. 32967 (ladder tapes); (Henderson & Hall v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGiant Furniture Co. v. United States
9 F. Supp. 585 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1935
But. since the decision in Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 , 54 S. Ct. 356, 359 , 78 L. … In Brown v. Helvering, the method of the .taxpayer was approved.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna