Case law

Rockwood v. Commissioner

31 B.T.A. 927 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 19, 1934

ROCKWOOD, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. WILLIAM M. ROCKWOOD, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. JOHN N. BROWNING, PETITIONER, v. … BROWNING, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Rockwood v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 72711-72714.

Keith E. Brown v. Department of Defense

Merit Systems Protection Board · May 15, 2015

BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, SF-0752-13-0336-C-1 v. … See Harris v.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 15, 2024

Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. … DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On January 6, 2021, Jennifer Nicole Brown filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine

Kaster v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 13, 2020

; Formal Physical Evaluation Board; ) Secretary of the Navy Council of Review v. ) Boards; Integrated Disability Evaluation … LNC Brown further recounted that when the colonel declined to do so, the board relied on Maj. Sloane’s email that the colonel would “be accepting his Informal PEB Results” as Col.

Maresi v. Commissioner

6 T.C. 582 · United States Tax Court · Mar 26, 1946

A., 1st Cir.), 128 Fed. (2d) 618, decided long after the Humes case, a determination of the Board of Tax Appeals (Estate of Francis Browne Grinnell, 44 B. T. … Humes v. United States, supra.

Louisville Veneer Mills v. Commissioner

12 B.T.A. 1352 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 16, 1928

The Board has already considered this question in a number of cases and decided the same adversely to the contention of the respondent. Fred T. Ley & Co., 9 B. T. A. 749; M. Brown & Co., 9 B. T.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 8, 2024

Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: February 6, 2024 v. … , Petitioner, No. 23-1075V Chief Special Master Corcoran v.

Nelson v. Bowler

626 F.2d 853 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 31, 1980

This appeal is not analogous, as the board suggests, to Rey-Bellet v. Engelhardt, supra, even though the issues are similar. … Norton v. Curtiss, 57 CCPA 1384, 1408, 433 F.2d 779, 797 , 167 USPQ 532 , 546-47 (1970). We agree with the board that he has not carried this heavy burden.

Pittsburgh & W. Va. Ry. v. Commissioner

22 B.T.A. 876 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 20, 1931

Hancock v. Louisville Railroad Co., 145 U. S. 409 ; Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 213 U. S. 25 ; Sanborn Brothers, 14 B. T. A. 1059; Gideon-Anderson Co., 18 B. T. … In Petry v.

Calvin Chin v. Department of Defense

2022 MSPB 34 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 7, 2022

Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 546 (1985). … Brown v. Department of the Treasury, 91 M.S.P.R. 60, ¶ 17 (2002).

Tait v. United States

4 Ct. Cl. 579 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1868

Browning, one of the firm to whom the claim is-assigned, are both suppressed as being interested in the claim and incompetent to testify. … Browning and others, executors of John E. Hanford, the sum of eight thousand seven hundred and seven dollars and thirty-four cents ($8,707 34.)

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 20, 2024

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0083V LISA BROWN, … Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v.

Thomas J. Grimes v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 28, 2021

Shinseki, 23 Vet.App. 1 (2009), to broadly construe a claim consistent with a lay claimant's reasonable expectations and the general rule of Ephraim v. Brown, 82 F.3d 399 (Fed. … See Young, 25 Vet.App. at 203 (holding that "referral of a matter is appropriate only when the Board lacks jurisdiction over the matter being referred" (citing Godfrey v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 398, 410 (1995))).

Dayton v. District of Columbia

18 Ct. Cl. 13 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1882

He suggested, however, that as the court had protected an assignee of a claimant, on equitable principles, in the consolidated cases of Brown, Prott, Wroe, and Dickson ( 17 C. Cls. … They have suffered the time to elapse in which they might have brought suits as assignees of Dayton, as did the assignees of Brown, and if they ever had any equitable claims which might have been enforced against the District

Rumley v. United States

169 Ct. Cl. 100 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1965

Brown considered, said firm was not the low bidder. Except for the prices 'bid by E. A. Brown Mfg. … Brown Mfg. Co. _ _ 8.

Fehlhaber Corp. v. United States

151 F. Supp. 817 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957

Loftis v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 551 ; Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., v. United States, 109 C. Cls. 517 ; Walsh Brothers v. United States, 107 C. Cls. 627 ; Gustav Hirsch v. United States, 94 C. … In a case decided by the Court of Claims on 1 November 1948 Hallman Brothers v.

Norbert J. Turk v. James B. Peake

21 Vet. App. 565 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 31, 2008

See Kowalski v. … See Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 218, 225 (1995); see also Fenderson v.

White v. West

11 Vet. App. 8 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 3, 1998

On November 12, 1997, the petitioner, through counsel, filed a petition for extraordinary relief regarding claims referred to a VA regional office (RO) by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) in a May 15, 1997, decision. … See Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42, 47 (1994) (veterans’ disability claims under chapter 11 of title 38 of the U.S.Code do not survive their deaths).

In re Citron

325 F.2d 254 · United States Customs Court · Dec 12, 1963

as follows: (1) The resulting plasma has been used with significant improvement and control of a clinical course of at least several types of human cancer. * * * (2) The acetone extract of the fat soluble components of Brown-Pearce … The decision of the board is affirmed for the reasons stated in our concurrent opinion in No. 7042. Martin, J., did not sit or participate in decision.

Barrera v. West

13 Vet. App. 418 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 25, 2000

Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291, 300-01 (1994) (where Court remands to Board, appellant is prevailing party). … See Chisem v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 374, 375 (1995) (quoting Johnson (Anne) v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 25, 26 (1994) (per curiam order)); Browder v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 268, 270 (1993).