Case law

Arthur W. Schnick v. Lawrence E. Fenn

277 F.2d 935 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 1, 1960

Brown v. Childs, 120 F.2d 350 , 28 CCPA 1229. Therefore evidence of subsequent experimenting and testing is without probative value. We come now to appellant’s contention that Fenn concealed or suppressed his invention. … Brown v. Childs, supra; Wheeler v. Linton, 186 F.2d 738 , 38 CCPA 799; Rhinevault v. Pfiester, 65 F.2d 161 , 20 CCPA 1112.

Homan - Homan v. Principi

17 Vet. App. 1 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 11, 2003

On May 31, 2002, the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board or BVA) issued two separate decisions regarding their claims for benefits. … In King v.

Eric J. Stewart v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 20, 2018

See Sacks v. West, 11 Vet.App. 314, 317 (1998); see also Libertine v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 521, 523 (1996); Beausoleil v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 459, 463 (1996). … Stefl v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.App. 120, 123 (2007) (quoting Ardison v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 405, 407 (1994)).

United States v. Vandegrift

7 Ct. Cust. 77 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 1, 1916

Brown, what are the identifying characteristics of vitrified tiles? — A. Their density, their nonabsorbent qualities, and because of their hardness. ■ Q. … The decision of the board is reversed.

Stephens-Adamson Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

16 B.T.A. 41 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 16, 1929

A. 1042; Browning Co., 6 B. T. A. 914. … Reviewed by the Board. Further proceedings toill he had wnder parar graph (c) or (d) of Buie 62. Smith, Sternhagen, and Mukdook dissent.

Dana v. Commissioner

36 B.T.A. 97 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 11, 1937

A. 967; Western Industries Co. v. Helvering, 82 Fed. (2d) 461; C. T. Investment Co. v. Commissioner, 88 Fed. (2d) 582; Gross v. Commissioner, 88 Fed. (2d) 567. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.

Gloria J. Greer v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 12, 2023

Brown, 8 Vet.App. 169, 177 (1995), the Court reiterated that section 5104 applied to the Board and reconciled section 5104(a)'s command to "provide" notice and 38 U.S.C. § 7104(e)'s command to "mail" notice by concluding … . v.

Deutsch-Australische Dampfschiffs Gesellschaft v. United States

59 Ct. Cl. 450 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1924

See Stoehr v. Wallace, 255 U. S. 239, 242; Commercial Trust Co. v. Miller, 262 U. S. 51 ; Brown v. United States, 8 Cranch 110, 126 ; Miller v. United States, 11 Wall. 268, 305 ; Fischer v. Palmer, 259 Fed. 355 . … Although it Avas recognized, as was said in Lamar v. Brown, 92 U.

Sugar Products Co. v. United States

10 Ct. Cust. 179 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 23, 1920

From which he concludes that the single general appraiser, the board of three, the classification board, and the collector have all erred, and asks that the judgment of the latter board be reversed, the liquidation of the … General Appraiser Brown, in his concurring opinion, referred to the case of United States v. Goldenberg ( 168 U.

Jeffcoat v. Principi

17 Vet. App. 213 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 22, 2003

See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table); Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 36, 39-40 (1994); Gilbert, supra.

In re Malcom

129 F.2d 529 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 15, 1942

Brown et al. v. Piper, 91 U. S. 37 . This doctrine does not require actual present knowledge on the part of the judicial authority. As was well stated in the case of Ball v. Flora, 26 App. D. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed.

Pratt, Read & Co. v. Commissioner

22 B.T.A. 1348 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 29, 1931

The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has held, in Commissioner v. Adolph Hirsch & Co., 30 Fed. (2d) 645, that “ the control of the stock owned by the same interest refers to beneficial interest.” … The following decisions of the Board are controlling upon this issue: Good Manufacturing Co., 15 B. T. A. 583; Oriental Real Estate Co., 17 B. T. A. 1220; Browne, McQuaid, Probst, Inc., 17 B. T. A. 1218; John B.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 6, 2026

Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. … Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Rachelle Bishop, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Sima v. United States

96 F. Supp. 932 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1951

Brown, 339 U.S. 103, 111 , 70 S.Ct. 495 , 94 L.Ed. 691 ; Ex parte Tucker, D.C., 212 F. 569, 570 . … Brown, 339 U.S. 103, 111 , 70 S.Ct. 495 , 94 L.Ed. 691 .

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 9, 2025

Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: November 7, 2025 v. … , Petitioner, V.

Calvin Chin v. Department of Defense

2022 MSPB 34 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 7, 2022

Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 546 (1985). … Brown v. Department of the Treasury, 91 M.S.P.R. 60, ¶ 17 (2002).

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 9, 2025

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1671V JULIE BROWN, … Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: July 31, 2025 v.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 1, 2026

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-2077V KATRINA BROWN, … Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v.

Bowling v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 379 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 2, 2002

Brown, 8 Vet.App. 488, 493 (1996)). “[T]he ‘product of reasonable hours times *383 a reasonable rate’ normally provides a ‘reasonable’ attorney’s fee.” Blum v. … Brown, 9 Vet.App. 177 ,’ 181 (1996) (holding EAJA fees available for work of attorney-supervised law students and citing Jordan v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 691 F.2d 514 (D.C.Cir.1982); Lindner v.

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 12, 2026

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-2195V SHARON BROWN, … Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v.