Case law

FAS Support Services, LLC v. United States

93 Fed. Cl. 687 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 4, 2010

In IMCO, Inc. v. … Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358 (Fed.Cir.2009); Metz v. United States, 466 F.3d 991 (Fed.Cir.2006).

Martin v. Commissioner

24 B.T.A. 813 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 13, 1931

Miller v. Gearin, 258 Fed. 225 ; certiorari denied, 250 U. S. 667 ; Cryan v. Wardell, 263 Fed. 248 . … Brown, 4 B. T. A. 1129; Shelby D. Scott, 9 B. T. A. 1219; Joseph L. B. Alexander, 13 B. T. A. 1169; James M. Butler, 19 B. T. A. 718. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

Beechcraft Defense Company, LLC Textron Aviation Inc. and Textron Aviation Defense, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 3, 2023

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Murphy, 823 F.3d 622, 626 (Fed. Cir. 2016). … Kellogg Brown, 832 F.3d at 626.

Arnold C. Kyhn v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 16, 2011

See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert, 1 Vet.App. at 56-57. Mr. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 218, 220 (1994) (when issue is not reasonably raised, Board is not required to "conduct an exercise in prognostication"), with Carpenter v.

Redding v. West

13 Vet. App. 512 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 22, 2000

Baker v. … While the Board must interpret the veteran's submissions broadly, the Board is not required to conjure up issues that were not raised by the claimant. See Talbert v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 352 (1995).

Richard W. Staab v. Robert A. McDonald

28 Vet. App. 50 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 8, 2016

Janssen v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 370, 379 (2001) (per curiam); see Mason v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 44, 59 (1995). The appellant had active service in the U.S. … Remand is thus required for the Board to readjudicate the appellant's claim and properly apply 38 U.S.C. § 1725. See Tucker v.

Leviathan Corporation

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 12, 2016

Harris v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc., 796 F. Supp. 2d 642, 649 (W.D. Penn. 2011) (citing Kalasho v. Republic of Iraq, 2007 WL 2683553, at *6 (E.D. Mich., Sept. 7, 2007)). … DRC, Inc. v. Custer Battles, LLC, 376 F. Supp. 2d 617, 26 (E.D.

National Forge Co. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,355 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1985

Defendant bases its argument primarily upon Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. … Accord International Graphics, Inc. v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 186, 192 (1983); see Kinetic Structures Corp. v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 343, 344 (1983); P. Francini & Co. v.

Joseph R. Hradel and Harold E. Staadt v. George L. Griffith, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells, George L. Griffith, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells v. Joseph R. Hradel and Harold E. Staadt

367 F.2d 851 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 9, 1967

Rimbach v. … cited Seeley v.

Stephanie Ortega v. Douglas A. Collins

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 13, 2026

Jensen v. Brown, 19 F.3d 1413, 1417 (Fed. … Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 119, 123 (1993).

Central United Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

33 B.T.A. 588 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 27, 1935

A. 354; affd., 77 Fed. (2d) 119; Russell-Miller Milling Co. v. Helvering, 69 Fed. (2d) 392; affd., 27 B. T. A. 405. Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered u/nder Bule 50. Moeeis dissents. … Brown, 10 B. T. A. 1122. In the latter case the Board quoted with approval from Producers Fuel Co., 1 B. T.

Edgerton v. United States

117 F. Supp. 193 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1954

Brown. … Brown.

HTA Aviation, LLC

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 27, 2014

(Steve) Brown)). … Brown's second declaration. We note further that the contract underlying the Court's decision in Winter v.

Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. v. New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Sep 27, 2021

See Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 22 USPQ2d 1429, 1433 (9th Cir. 1992) (finding balancing test will best resolve discovery disputes relating to protection of trade secrets). … In view of the Board’s limited jurisdiction and the narrowness of issues decided in Board cases, discovery in Board cases is generally narrower than that in court proceedings. Frito-Lay N. Am., Inc. v.

Harvey v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 305 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 4, 2001

See Baker v. West, 11 Vet.App. 163, 169 (1998). Accordingly, a remand is required in order to provide the Board with an opportunity to readjudicate the veteran's claim. See generally Karnas v. … . § 5101 note) (requiring Secretary to provide for "expeditious treatment" of claims remanded by Board or Court). See Drosky v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 251, 257 (1997).

Crocker v. Commissioner

32 B.T.A. 861 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 28, 1935

Brown Coal & Coke Co., infra, the Board held that even if not legally organized to carry on business with the public under the laws of the State of Kentucky, the record warranted the conclusion that the corporation was an … Brown Coal & Coke Co., supra, the Board stated that “ The evidence indicates that E. L.

Roebling v. Commissioner

28 B.T.A. 644 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 11, 1933

Brown, Trustee, supra, and Margaret B. … Brown, Trustee, supra, and Margaret B. Sparrow et al., Trustees, supra.

Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United States

71 Ct. Cl. 739 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1931

Cls. 549 ; Eaton, Brown & Simpson, Inc., v. United States, 62 C. … Crook Co., Inc., v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 348 ; McClintic-Marshall Co. v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 817; Goldstone v. United States, 61 C. Cls. 401 ; M. H. McCloskey, jr. (Inc.) v. United States, 66 C. Cls. 105 .

Richard D. Simmons v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 20, 2018

R. at 137-42 (citing Brown v. West, 203 F.3d 1378, 1381-82 (Fed. … Russell v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 310, 313-14, 319 (1992); see King v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.App. 433, 439 (2014); Bouton v. Peake, 23 Vet.App. 70, 71- 72 (2008); Damrel v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 242, 245 (1994); see also Bustos v.

S.S. BELLINA

Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1960

Alien crewman involved : L--V—. BAsts cos FINE: Act of 1952—Section 254 (8 U.S.C. 1284). … Browning & Company, agents for the vessel, for failure to detain on hoard the vessel the above-named alien crewman who was not granted a conditional landing permit.