Case law

Harriet H. Kriner v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 25, 2023

(citing Kluttz v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 304, 306–07 (1994); 38 C.F.R. § 3.155(a)); see also Quarles v. … (citing Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 429, 433 (1995)); Deloach v. Shinseki, 704 F.3d 1370, 1380 (Fed.

Davis v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 163 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 29, 2001

See Kutcherousky v. West, 12 Vet.App. 369, 372-73 (1999) (per curiam order). The Board shall proceed expeditiously. See Veterans' Benefits Improvements Act, Pub. L. … . § 5101 note) (requiring Secretary to provide for "expeditious treatment" of claims remanded by Board or Court); Drosky v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 251, 257 (1997).

Gaines v. West

11 Vet. App. 113 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 11, 1998

ORDER PER CURIAM: The appellant, Jerry Gaines, Sr., appeals, through counsel, a December 31, 1996, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) denying service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder. … Gober, 10 Vet. *115 App. 498, 500, 503-04 (1997); Curtis v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 104, 108-09 (1995).

Elie Halpern v. Anthony J. Principi

17 Vet. App. 225 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 15, 2003

Supreme Court decision, Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291 (1994),] as a prevailing party was based on the Secretary’s concession to that status, and on the apparent rule drawn from [Shalala v.]

Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 301 · United States Customs Court · Oct 4, 1960

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. … Williams & Co., Inc. ( 40 C.C.P.A. 130 , C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States ( 22 Cust. Ct. 33 , C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 414 · United States Customs Court · Dec 1, 1959

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. … Williams & Co., Inc. ( 40 C.C.P.A. 130 , C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States ( 22 Cust. Ct. 33 , C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

William A. Forcier v. R. James Nicholson

19 Vet. App. 414 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 25, 2006

See id.; see also Hines v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 309, 311 (1994); Bond v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 376, 377 (1992). … See Stadin v. Brown, 8 Vet.

In Re Rye Select Broad Market Prime Fund Securities & Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation

648 F. Supp. 2d 1385 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Aug 11, 2009

No. 2:09-615 *1388 Western District of Texas Austin Capital Management, Ltd. v. The Board of Trustees of the Texas Iron Workers’ Pension Fund, et al., C.A. … Brown and David E. Friedman (collectively ACM). 2 . This action (Peshkin) was originally filed in the Southern District of New York and included in MDL No. 2052.

Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 477 · United States Customs Court · Apr 29, 1954

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board (34 C. C. P. A. 118, C. A. … In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, as well as that in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A.

Abell Forwarding Co. v. United States

13 Ct. Cust. 597 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 13, 1926

In this hearing, the Board of General Appraisers is not at all limited or bound by what some administrative officer may think about the matter which the board, alone, must, under the law, determine. … United States v. Lippmann et al., 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 336 ; Brown & Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 26 ; United States v. Stegemann, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 198 ; Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. United States, 12 Ct.

Arnold C. Kyhn v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 16, 2011

See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert, 1 Vet.App. at 56-57. Mr. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 218, 220 (1994) (when issue is not reasonably raised, Board is not required to "conduct an exercise in prognostication"), with Carpenter v.

M. Pressner & Co. v. United States

26 C.C.P.A. 186 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 31, 1938

Judge Brown. Note my dissent. Mr. Mandell. Exception, The trial court, Judge Brown dissenting, overruled the protest without affirming the action of the collector. … It may furthermore be said that this course of procedure has been so long followed by the board and the courts that this fact alone argues legislative authority therefor. In the case of Brown & Co. v.

Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 193 · United States Customs Court · Apr 24, 1951

Bush & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 158 , C.

White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States

46 Fed. Cl. 20 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 1999

Id.; see also Brown v. United States, 86 F.3d 1554, 1560 (Fed.Cir.1996). … Relying on Brown v.

Quartuccio v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 183 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 17, 2002

Additionally, the appellant argues that the Board was required, pursuant to Murincsak v. … Graves v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 522, 524 (1996) (citation omitted).

Michelle R. Goodwin v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 128 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 19, 2008

Id. at 117 (citing Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1158-59 (Fed. Cir. 1997)). … See Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 88, 96 (1996) (Board is required to address all issues "reasonably raised from a liberal reading of the documents or oral testimony submitted prior to the [Board] decision").

Sanchez-Benitez v. West

13 Vet. App. 282 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 29, 1999

See LeShore v. … See Winters v.

Bobby R. George v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 26, 2020

Wilkie, 30 Vet.App. 267, 274 (2018); Damrel v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 242, 245 (1994); Russell v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 310, 313-14 (1992) (en banc). 36 Andrews v. … Cir. 2002). 40 Russell, 3 Vet.App. at 315. 41 Acciola v. Peake, 22 Vet.App. 320, 325 (2008) (citing Sondel v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 218, 219-20 (1994)). 42 See McNutt v. Gen.

Uncasville Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

19 B.T.A. 920 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 12, 1930

S. 110 ; Bogle & Co. v. Commissioner, 26 Fed. (2d) 771; Balaban & Katz Corporation v. Commissioner, 30 Fed. (2d) 807; Woodside Cotton Mills, 13 B. T. A. 266; Pittsburgh Hotels Co., 15 B. T. A. 587. … Brown, 18 B. T. A. 859. The respondent’s determinations as to value on March 1, 1913, profit, and depreciation and obsolescence are sustained.

Pauline Garcia v. David J. Shulkin

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 9, 2017

See Austin v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 547, 552 (1994) ("[B]asic fair play requires that evidence be procured by the agency in an impartial, unbiased, and neutral manner."). … The Court "[has] no jurisdiction to consider the Chairman's denial of [a motion for] reconsideration," Mayer v. Brown, 37 F.3d 618, 619 (Fed.