Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.50s
Thomas E. O'Connell v. R. James Nicholson
21 Vet. App. 89 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 7, 2007
v. … Brown, 10 Vet.App. 93, 97 (1997).
Cited 23 timesPublishedAngel Vazquez-Flores v. Eric K. Shinseki
24 Vet. App. 94 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 22, 2010
Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995) aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed.Cir.1996). … Co. v. United States, 83 F.3d 391, 396 (Fed.Cir. 1996))); Parker v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 476, 481 (1996). .
Cited 23 timesPublished19 Cl. Ct. 515 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 15, 1990
Thus, the issue is one of law, Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. … See 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A); Alexander v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm’n, 609 F.2d 543, 546 (D.C.Cir.1979).
Cited 4 timesPublishedEstate of Akin v. United States
31 Fed. Cl. 89 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 1994
Akin and Brown J. Akin, Jr., paid $115,902.00 in federal taxes for the tax year ending December 31, 1983. Mr. Akin died on August 12, 1990. Plaintiffs are the estate of Mr. Akin and Mrs. Akin. … Corp. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedUnited States v. Southern Paper Co.
12 Ct. Cust. 250 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 9, 1924
It is therefore clear that if the case is governed by the former enactment and not by the latter the board’s judgment must be reversed. • In the recent cases of Brown & Co. v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 26 ; T. … D. 40026), Scaramelli v. United States (12 id. 134 ; T. D-40056), United States v. Neuman & Schwiers Co. (12 id. 207; T.
Cited 2 timesPublished22 B.T.A. 828 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 19, 1931
WILLIAM GAHAGEN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Gahagen v. Commissioner Docket No. 28514. … the petitioner and Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMichelle R. Goodwin v. James B. Peake
22 Vet. App. 128 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 19, 2008
Id. at 117 (citing Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1158-59 (Fed. Cir. 1997)). … See Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 88, 96 (1996) (Board is required to address all issues "reasonably raised from a liberal reading of the documents or oral testimony submitted prior to the [Board] decision").
Cited 74 timesPublishedAmerican Natural Gas Co. v. United States
13 F. Supp. 69 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1936
Loewer Realty Co. v. Anderson (C.C.A.) 31 F.(2d) 268, 269 ; Sunshine Cloak & Suit Co. v. Commissioner, 10 B.T. A. 971, 977. … Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U.S. 283 . 286, 51 S.Ct. 140 , 75 L.Ed. 343 ; Manz Corporation v. United States, 54 F.(2d) 177 , 74 Ct.Cl. 5 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedWiley Brown v. Department of Homeland Security
Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 5, 2026
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD WILEY BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, DA-0752-23-0390-I-1 v. … See Dieter v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedElie Halpern v. Anthony J. Principi
17 Vet. App. 225 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 15, 2003
Supreme Court decision, Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291 (1994),] as a prevailing party was based on the Secretary’s concession to that status, and on the apparent rule drawn from [Shalala v.]
Cited 2 timesPublishedAbell Forwarding Co. v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 597 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 13, 1926
In this hearing, the Board of General Appraisers is not at all limited or bound by what some administrative officer may think about the matter which the board, alone, must, under the law, determine. … United States v. Lippmann et al., 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 336 ; Brown & Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 26 ; United States v. Stegemann, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 198 ; Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. United States, 12 Ct.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGeorgia Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Commissioner
28 B.T.A. 1153 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 18, 1933
BROWN, Chairman of Board of Directors. JOSEPH E. BOSTON, President. … BROWN, Chairman of Board of Directors.
Cited 0 timesPublished150 F.2d 862 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1945
See Bowles v. Willingham, 1944, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892; Taylor v. Brown, Em.App., 1943, 137 F.2d 655 , certiorari denied 320 U.S. 787 , 64 S.Ct. 194 , 88 L.Ed. 473 ; Wilson v. … Brown, Em.App., 1943, 137 F.2d 348 . It will, therefore, serve no useful purpose to discuss them here.
Cited 11 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 1400 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 24, 1929
Co. v. Bond, 240 U. S. 449, 456 , 36 S. Ct. 403 , 60 L. Ed. 735 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Anderson, 212 U. S. 215, 227 , 29 S. Ct. 252 , 53 L. Ed. 480 . And see Casement v. Brown, 148 U. S. 615 , 13 S. Ct. 672 , 37 L. … See Vane v. Newcombe, 132 U. S. 220 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedTyrone A. Andrews v. Eric K. Shinseki
26 Vet. App. 193 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 31, 2013
Food & Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132-33 (2000). … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995) (Board's statement "must be adequate to enable a claimant to understand the precise basis for the Board's decision, as well as to facilitate review in this Court"); see also Tucker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedClifton Arline v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 1, 2021
We review the Board's credibility determination and other factual findings under the "clearly erroneous" standard. Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 534 (1993) (en banc). … See Reonal v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 458, 460-61 (1993) ("An opinion based upon an inaccurate factual premise has no probative value."). Although Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLeroy S. Robinson, Jr. v. Robert A. McDonald
28 Vet. App. 178 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 14, 2016
King v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 19, 22 (1993). … The Court therefore “ ‘relies on counsel for the Secretary to act as an impartial officer of the Court when [assembling] the record,’ ” ZO v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 440, 443 (1993) (quoting Parmley v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGantz Tank Co. v. Commissioner
16 B.T.A. 212 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 25, 1929
On motion of the respondent, duly granted, the hearing on the case was limited to the issues specified in sections (a) and (b) of Rule 62 of the Board’s rules of practice. … Browning, supra; Stephens-Adamson Mfg. Co., 16 B. T. A. 41. Further proceedings will be had under Rule 62 (c) and (d).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDonald v. McCray v. Robert L. Wilkie
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 18, 2019
Sacks v. West, 11 Vet.App. 314, 317 (1998) (citing Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 67, 73-74 (1997), and Bielby v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 260, 265-67 (1994)). … See Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 467, 470-71 (1993).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAndrea M. McNair v. Eric K. Shinseki
25 Vet. App. 98 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 18, 2011
Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995) (holding that the Board's statement "must be adequate to enable a claimant to understand the precise basis for the Board's decision, as well as to facilitate review in this Court"). … Although remand generally is warranted because our review of the Board's findings is frustrated, see Tucker v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna