Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.50s

  • Thomas E. O'Connell v. R. James Nicholson

    21 Vet. App. 89 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 7, 2007

    v. … Brown, 10 Vet.App. 93, 97 (1997).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Angel Vazquez-Flores v. Eric K. Shinseki

    24 Vet. App. 94 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 22, 2010

    Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995) aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed.Cir.1996). … Co. v. United States, 83 F.3d 391, 396 (Fed.Cir. 1996))); Parker v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 476, 481 (1996). .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Burd v. United States

    19 Cl. Ct. 515 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 15, 1990

    Thus, the issue is one of law, Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. … See 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A); Alexander v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm’n, 609 F.2d 543, 546 (D.C.Cir.1979).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Estate of Akin v. United States

    31 Fed. Cl. 89 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 1994

    Akin and Brown J. Akin, Jr., paid $115,902.00 in federal taxes for the tax year ending December 31, 1983. Mr. Akin died on August 12, 1990. Plaintiffs are the estate of Mr. Akin and Mrs. Akin. … Corp. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • United States v. Southern Paper Co.

    12 Ct. Cust. 250 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 9, 1924

    It is therefore clear that if the case is governed by the former enactment and not by the latter the board’s judgment must be reversed. • In the recent cases of Brown & Co. v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 26 ; T. … D. 40026), Scaramelli v. United States (12 id. 134 ; T. D-40056), United States v. Neuman & Schwiers Co. (12 id. 207; T.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gahagen v. Commissioner

    22 B.T.A. 828 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 19, 1931

    WILLIAM GAHAGEN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Gahagen v. Commissioner Docket No. 28514. … the petitioner and Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Michelle R. Goodwin v. James B. Peake

    22 Vet. App. 128 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 19, 2008

    Id. at 117 (citing Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1158-59 (Fed. Cir. 1997)). … See Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 88, 96 (1996) (Board is required to address all issues "reasonably raised from a liberal reading of the documents or oral testimony submitted prior to the [Board] decision").

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • American Natural Gas Co. v. United States

    13 F. Supp. 69 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1936

    Loewer Realty Co. v. Anderson (C.C.A.) 31 F.(2d) 268, 269 ; Sunshine Cloak & Suit Co. v. Commissioner, 10 B.T. A. 971, 977. … Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U.S. 283 . 286, 51 S.Ct. 140 , 75 L.Ed. 343 ; Manz Corporation v. United States, 54 F.(2d) 177 , 74 Ct.Cl. 5 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wiley Brown v. Department of Homeland Security

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 5, 2026

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD WILEY BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, DA-0752-23-0390-I-1 v. … See Dieter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Elie Halpern v. Anthony J. Principi

    17 Vet. App. 225 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 15, 2003

    Supreme Court decision, Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291 (1994),] as a prevailing party was based on the Secretary’s concession to that status, and on the apparent rule drawn from [Shalala v.]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Abell Forwarding Co. v. United States

    13 Ct. Cust. 597 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 13, 1926

    In this hearing, the Board of General Appraisers is not at all limited or bound by what some administrative officer may think about the matter which the board, alone, must, under the law, determine. … United States v. Lippmann et al., 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 336 ; Brown & Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 26 ; United States v. Stegemann, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 198 ; Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. United States, 12 Ct.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Georgia Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    28 B.T.A. 1153 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 18, 1933

    BROWN, Chairman of Board of Directors. JOSEPH E. BOSTON, President. … BROWN, Chairman of Board of Directors.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Veillette v. Bowles

    150 F.2d 862 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1945

    See Bowles v. Willingham, 1944, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892; Taylor v. Brown, Em.App., 1943, 137 F.2d 655 , certiorari denied 320 U.S. 787 , 64 S.Ct. 194 , 88 L.Ed. 473 ; Wilson v. … Brown, Em.App., 1943, 137 F.2d 348 . It will, therefore, serve no useful purpose to discuss them here.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • McIntosh v. Commissioner

    16 B.T.A. 1400 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 24, 1929

    Co. v. Bond, 240 U. S. 449, 456 , 36 S. Ct. 403 , 60 L. Ed. 735 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Anderson, 212 U. S. 215, 227 , 29 S. Ct. 252 , 53 L. Ed. 480 . And see Casement v. Brown, 148 U. S. 615 , 13 S. Ct. 672 , 37 L. … See Vane v. Newcombe, 132 U. S. 220 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tyrone A. Andrews v. Eric K. Shinseki

    26 Vet. App. 193 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 31, 2013

    Food & Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132-33 (2000). … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995) (Board's statement "must be adequate to enable a claimant to understand the precise basis for the Board's decision, as well as to facilitate review in this Court"); see also Tucker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clifton Arline v. Denis McDonough

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 1, 2021

    We review the Board's credibility determination and other factual findings under the "clearly erroneous" standard. Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 534 (1993) (en banc). … See Reonal v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 458, 460-61 (1993) ("An opinion based upon an inaccurate factual premise has no probative value."). Although Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leroy S. Robinson, Jr. v. Robert A. McDonald

    28 Vet. App. 178 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 14, 2016

    King v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 19, 22 (1993). … The Court therefore “ ‘relies on counsel for the Secretary to act as an impartial officer of the Court when [assembling] the record,’ ” ZO v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 440, 443 (1993) (quoting Parmley v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gantz Tank Co. v. Commissioner

    16 B.T.A. 212 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 25, 1929

    On motion of the respondent, duly granted, the hearing on the case was limited to the issues specified in sections (a) and (b) of Rule 62 of the Board’s rules of practice. … Browning, supra; Stephens-Adamson Mfg. Co., 16 B. T. A. 41. Further proceedings will be had under Rule 62 (c) and (d).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Donald v. McCray v. Robert L. Wilkie

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 18, 2019

    Sacks v. West, 11 Vet.App. 314, 317 (1998) (citing Rucker v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 67, 73-74 (1997), and Bielby v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 260, 265-67 (1994)). … See Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 467, 470-71 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Andrea M. McNair v. Eric K. Shinseki

    25 Vet. App. 98 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 18, 2011

    Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995) (holding that the Board's statement "must be adequate to enable a claimant to understand the precise basis for the Board's decision, as well as to facilitate review in this Court"). … Although remand generally is warranted because our review of the Board's findings is frustrated, see Tucker v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.