Case law

Application of Kebrich

201 F.2d 951 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 6, 1953

The lead contents and colours of the solids were: after two recrystallisations, 46.4%, light brown; four, 45.4%, light brown; five, 43.6%, buff; seven, 37.6%, white (PbSt2 requires 26.8% Pb; PbSte, PbO, *953 41.6%; PbSt2,2PbO … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

Alfred Procopio, Jr. v. Eric K. Shinseki

26 Vet. App. 76 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 16, 2012

v. … (citing Action on Smoking & Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 713 F.2d 795, 797 (D.C. Cir. 1983))); see Paulsen v.

Fritz v. West

13 Vet. App. 439 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 18, 2000

Fritz v. West, 13 Vet.App. 190 (1999). Briefly, the pertinent facts follow: The appellant, veteran James F. Fritz, appealed pro se a September 22, 1997, decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA). … Cook v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 226, 240 (1994), aff'd on other grounds, 68 F.3d 447 (Fed. Cir. 1995); accord Sandoval v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 177, 181-82 (1996); Camphor v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 272, 277 (1995); Curtis v.

Don H. Nelson v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 407 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 30, 2004

Brown, 4 Vet.App. 283, 293 (1993), aff.d, 17 F.3d 368 (Fed.Cir.1994)). See 38 U.S.C. § 5110 (a); 38 C.F.R. § 3.400 (q)(l)(ii) (2004); Leonard v. … Valiao v. Principi, 17 Vet.App. 229, 231-32 (2003) (“[w]here the facts averred by a claimant cannot conceivably result in any disposition of the appeal other than affirmance of the Board decision, ...

Avant v. Bowles

139 F.2d 702 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1943

See Northwood Apts., Inc., v. Brown, Em.App., 1943, 137 F.2d 809, 813, 814 . … For state court decisions to similar effect see State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 1935, 118 N.J.Eq. 504, 179 A. 116 ; Spokane Hotel Co. v. Younger, 1920, 113 Wash. 359 , 194 P. 595 .

Fritz v. West

13 Vet. App. 190 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 23, 1999

See Shaw v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 498, 503 (1997); Curtis v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 104 , 108—[09] (1995). … . § 2412 (d)(1)(A); Stillwell v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291, 301 (1994).

Distributed Solutions, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 4, 2014

Andersen Consulting v. United States & Computer Sciences Corp., 959 F.2d 929, 934 (Fed. … ."); ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United States, 524 F.2d 680, 684 (Ct.

Fury v. Fleming

161 F.2d 189 · Emergency Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1947

Chatlos v. Brown, Em.App. 1943, 136 F.2d 490, 493 . The rental bargain, as of the maximum rent date, between the landlord and tenant, was frozen. … Lakemore Co. v. Brown, Em.App., 1943, 137 F.2d 355 . What services were included in the agreement between the landlord and the tenant in this case?

Ray v. Kronmiller

167 F.2d 518 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 6, 1948

See Erben v. Yardley, 267 Fed. 345 , 1920 C. D. 220; Isaac Stern and Jacob Huether v. Louis H. Schroeder and Joshua Wagner, 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 690, 36 F. (2d) 518, 3 U. S. Pat. Q. 351; Albert Broadmeyer v. … The situation here presented is similar to that in the case of Schuster v. Brown, 21 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 932, 69 F. (2d) 373, 21 U. S. Pat. Q. 11.

New York Zinc Co. v. Commissioner

27 B.T.A. 9 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 4, 1932

At that date three veins of ore on the Brown and White tracts had been worked — Brown No. 1 and No. 2, 350 and 100 feet, respectively; the White vein, 150 feet — and drifting had been done at various levels to these depths … It is in the light of all of their views that the duty is upon the Board to consider the facts in evidence and find the ultimate fact of value; and thus we find no preponderance of the evidence to justify, let alone compel

Nicolo J. Porriello v. David J. Shulkin

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 12, 2018

Bissonnette, 18 Vet.App. at 111 (citing Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528, 539 (1993) (en banc)). Mr. … Board] review were based on the same factual basis" (citing Brown v.

Peggy L. Quattlebaum v. Eric K. Shinseki

25 Vet. App. 171 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 5, 2012

Brown, 6 Vet.App. 483, 490 (1994), aff'd, 102 F.3d 1236 (Fed. … For example, in Moffitt v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 214, 217 (1997), a surviving spouse filed an accrued benefits claim based on TDIU within one year of her husband's death, which was finally denied in a 1987 Board decision.

Scarborough v. Nicholson

19 Vet. App. 253 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 5, 2005

Brown, 9 Vet.App. 304, 308 (1996) (en banc), rev’d sub nom. Bazalo v. … Vidal v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 488, 493 (1996).

Espiridion L. Lueras v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 435 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 21, 2004

A determination by the Board that there was bad faith is a factual determination which is reviewed under the "clearly erroneous" standard. East v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 34, 40 (1995). … Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 52 (1990) (quoting Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573-74 (1985)).

Howard Morgan, Jr. v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 16, 2019

See Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995). … See Lyles v. Shulkin, 29 Vet.App. 109 (2017); Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 259, 261 (1994); VA Gen. Coun. Prec. 23- 97 (July 1, 1997).

Straughter v. United States

120 Fed. Cl. 119 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 20, 2015

Brown, 418 F.2d 883, 886 (8th Cir. 1969) (quoting McNutt, 298 U.S. at 189, and citing Jascourt v. United States, 521 F.2d 1406 (Ct. C1. 1975))). Mr. Straughter premises this court’s jurisdiction on the Tucker Act. … Cir. 1995); Ward v. Brown, 22 F.3d 516 (2d Cir. 1994); Mitchell, 930 F.2d 893.9 Both the APA and the Tucker Act waive the sovereign immunity of the federal government in certain circumstances.

Louann Wolfe v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 31, 2020

In Patterson v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 362, 365 (1993), the Court, borrowing language from I.C.C. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 482 U.S. 270, 280 (1980), found that Mr. … See Rosler, 1 Vet.App. at 249; see also Mayer v. Brown, 37 F.3d 618, 620 (Fed.

Bernstein v. Commissioner

6 B.T.A. 323 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 26, 1927

The record is convincing that the leases, whether those acquired by the Mohawk Oil Co. from it predecessor partnership, Brown and Dyer, or those acquired under assignment from Brown and Bernstein, had no substantial value … The question before the Board is, Did Bernstein and his wife acquire, in the year 1919, any gain out of these transactions?

Thomas Pekular v. Gordon H. Mansfield

22 Vet. App. 7 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 20, 2007

See Padgett v. Nicholson, 473 F.3d 1364, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (Padgett III); Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1242 (Fed. Cir. 1996). … The Federal Circuit drew a distinction between Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236 (Fed.

Military Aircraft Parts

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Nov 17, 2015

Board Rule 12.2(c). … Comm 'r, INS v. Jean, 496 U.S. 154, 159 (1990); see also Hubbard v. United States, 480 F.3d 1327, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2007).