Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.16s
Starflight Boats v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 592 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 8, 2001
We agree with the Armed Service Board of Contract Appeals that the Board is “not precluded from considering evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreements or negotiations or other relevant evidence concerning dealings and … Brown’s assistance. Actual authority can either be express or implied-in-fact. See H. Landau & Co. v. United States, 886 F.2d 322, 324 (Fed.Cir.1989).
Cited 15 timesPublished39 F.2d 998 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1930
In Schwab v. … In Rea v. Heiner (D.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAmerican Technical Services, Inc
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 22, 2023
Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Murphy, 823 F.3d 622, 626 (Fed. Cir. 2016). … FAR 33.201; Kellogg Brown, 823 F.3d at 626.
Cited 0 timesPublishedP AMELA J. S HARP v. Anthony J. Principi
17 Vet. App. 431 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 21, 2004
Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42, 52-54 (1994) (veteran's chapter 11 disability compensation claims "die[] with him"; substitution of party not permissible in this Court where appellant is veteran who dies while Board's denial of veteran's … See Owings v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 17, 23 (1995) (noting distinction between recipients of and applicants for benefits), aff'd, 86 F.3d 1178 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table).
Cited 3 timesPublishedRochelle E. Andrews v. Anthony J. Principi
17 Vet. App. 319 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 22, 2003
The appellant, through counsel, appealed a June 24, 2002, Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board or BVA) decision that (1) had determined that new and material evidence had not been presented to reopen her claims for service connection … In a February 6, 2003, order, the Court granted the parties' joint motion for remand, vacated that Board decision, and remanded the matters pursuant to Quartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet.App. 183, 187 (2002), and Charles v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedEstate of Owen v. Commissioner
104 T.C. 498 · United States Tax Court · Apr 20, 1995
United States v. American Trucking Associations, 310 U.S. 534, 543-544 (1940); U.S. Padding Corp. v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 177, 184 (1987), affd. 865 F.2d 750 (6th Cir. 1989); Huntsberry v. … Huntsberry v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. at 747-748 ; see Pallottini v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 498, 503 (1988), and cases there cited.
Cited 7 timesPublished221 Ct. Cl. 898 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 19, 1979
Browne, filed April 30, 1979, as the basis for judgment in this case. The trial judge recommends that plaintiffs case be remanded to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (Correction Board). … Application to the Correction Board is not a mandatory remedy. See Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct.Cl. 145 , 391 F. 2d 938 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlberto Q. Palor v. R. James Nicholson
21 Vet. App. 325 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 29, 2007
Soria v. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 80, 86 (1994)(remanding where veteran asserted that VA sought certification of his service with erroneous spelling of his first name), overruled on other grounds by D’Amico v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMaurine DeWolfe Brown v. Commissioner
12 T.C.M. 948 · United States Tax Court · Aug 20, 1953
Maurine DeWolfe Brown v. Commissioner. Maurine DeWolfe Brown v. Commissioner Docket No. 35476. United States Tax Court 1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 143 ; 12 T.C.M. (CCH) 948 ; T.C.M. (RIA) 53281 ; August 20, 1953 *143 1. … Brown. On December 31, 1942, the petitioner and Clarence R. Brown executed a document entitled "Property Settlement Agreement" (hereinafter referred to as the "1942 agreement").
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedCatherine A. Shephard v. Eric K. Shinseki
26 Vet. App. 159 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 27, 2013
West, 11 Vet.App. 228, 236-37 (1998); Villeza v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 353, 357-58 (1996), appeal dismissed, 114 F.3d 1206 (Fed. Cir. 1997); United States v. M. … See Appellant's Br. at 15; Secretary's Br. at 21-22; see also Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995). The Court agrees.
Cited 2 timesPublished29 B.T.A. 616 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 21, 1933
The *617 parties have filed a stipulation which, the Board has accepted and from which the material facts are summarized as follows: The petitioner is, and lor a long time prior to the taxable year, was the wife of Frederick … Estate of Leiter, 164 Cal. 181 ; 128 Pac. 334 ; Olson v. Superior Court, 175 Cal. 250 ; 165 Pac. 706 ; Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 ; 147 Pac. 1168 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedSamuel L. Mayhue v. Eric K. Shinseki
24 Vet. App. 273 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 18, 2011
Mayhue's assertion, where, as here, the Board concludes that the evidence is not in equipoise, specific consideration of § 4.3 is not warranted. See Schoolman v. … See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table); Gilbert, 1 Vet.App. at 57. III.
Cited 20 timesPublished159 F.2d 760 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 11, 1947
Hatfield, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 4 and 6 in … For the reasons stated, the decision of the Board of Appeals is modi fied, being affirmed as to claim 4 and reversed as to claim 6.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAntonio Pacheco v. Sloan D. Gibson
27 Vet. App. 21 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 17, 2014
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (“The meaning — or ambiguity— of certain words or phrases may only become evident when placed in context.”); Brown v. … . § 7111 (e) (stating that a request for revision of a Board decision based on CUE shall be submitted directly to the Board); Andre v.
Cited 13 timesPublished9 Ct. Cl. 508 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1873
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 19, 2017
Brown, 9 Vet.App. 369, 377 (1996) (quoting McTighe v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 29, 30 (1994)). … Owings v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 17, 23 (1995).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Board of the Young Men's Christian Associations v. United States
396 F.2d 467 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1968
In United States v. … Justice Field in United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublished1 T.C. 442 · United States Tax Court · Jan 12, 1943
Compare, however, Commissioner v. Buck, 120 Fed. (2d) 775; Helvering v. Bok, 132 Fed. (2d) 365, affirming Mary Louise Bok, 46 B. T. A. 678; and Brown v. Commissioner, 131 Fed. (2d) 640, affirming Antoinette K. … Brown, 46 B. T. A. 782.
Cited 15 timesPublished16 Vet. App. 52 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 4, 2002
IVERS, Judge: On April 2, 1999, the Court, in a single-judge order, vacated a July 29, 1997, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision and remanded the matter on appeal to the Board for readjudication. … In Sumner , the Court addressed its decision in Stillwell v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291 (1994), its pre-Buckhannon seminal decision defining an EAJA prevailing party.
Cited 7 timesPublished10 Ct. Cust. 62 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 10, 1920
United States v. Gage Bros. & Co. ( 8 Ct. Cust. Appls., 306 ; T. D. 37584); Bayersdorfer & Co. v. United States ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 446 ; T. D; 33875); United States v. International Forwarding Co. ( 8 Ct. Cust. … The decisions of Board 1 as to protests 837745 and 849479, of the’ R. L. Cochran Co., are affirmed. The decisions of Boards 1, 2, and 3, as to the protests of A. & H.
Cited 35 timesPublished
Ask Donna