Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

1.16s

  • Starflight Boats v. United States

    48 Fed. Cl. 592 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 8, 2001

    We agree with the Armed Service Board of Contract Appeals that the Board is “not precluded from considering evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreements or negotiations or other relevant evidence concerning dealings and … Brown’s assistance. Actual authority can either be express or implied-in-fact. See H. Landau & Co. v. United States, 886 F.2d 322, 324 (Fed.Cir.1989).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Wells v. United States

    39 F.2d 998 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1930

    In Schwab v. … In Rea v. Heiner (D.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • American Technical Services, Inc

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 22, 2023

    Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Murphy, 823 F.3d 622, 626 (Fed. Cir. 2016). … FAR 33.201; Kellogg Brown, 823 F.3d at 626.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • P AMELA J. S HARP v. Anthony J. Principi

    17 Vet. App. 431 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 21, 2004

    Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42, 52-54 (1994) (veteran's chapter 11 disability compensation claims "die[] with him"; substitution of party not permissible in this Court where appellant is veteran who dies while Board's denial of veteran's … See Owings v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 17, 23 (1995) (noting distinction between recipients of and applicants for benefits), aff'd, 86 F.3d 1178 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rochelle E. Andrews v. Anthony J. Principi

    17 Vet. App. 319 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 22, 2003

    The appellant, through counsel, appealed a June 24, 2002, Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board or BVA) decision that (1) had determined that new and material evidence had not been presented to reopen her claims for service connection … In a February 6, 2003, order, the Court granted the parties' joint motion for remand, vacated that Board decision, and remanded the matters pursuant to Quartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet.App. 183, 187 (2002), and Charles v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Estate of Owen v. Commissioner

    104 T.C. 498 · United States Tax Court · Apr 20, 1995

    United States v. American Trucking Associations, 310 U.S. 534, 543-544 (1940); U.S. Padding Corp. v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 177, 184 (1987), affd. 865 F.2d 750 (6th Cir. 1989); Huntsberry v. … Huntsberry v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. at 747-748 ; see Pallottini v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 498, 503 (1988), and cases there cited.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Engels

    221 Ct. Cl. 898 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 19, 1979

    Browne, filed April 30, 1979, as the basis for judgment in this case. The trial judge recommends that plaintiffs case be remanded to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (Correction Board). … Application to the Correction Board is not a mandatory remedy. See Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct.Cl. 145 , 391 F. 2d 938 (1968).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alberto Q. Palor v. R. James Nicholson

    21 Vet. App. 325 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 29, 2007

    Soria v. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 80, 86 (1994)(remanding where veteran asserted that VA sought certification of his service with erroneous spelling of his first name), overruled on other grounds by D’Amico v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Maurine DeWolfe Brown v. Commissioner

    12 T.C.M. 948 · United States Tax Court · Aug 20, 1953

    Maurine DeWolfe Brown v. Commissioner. Maurine DeWolfe Brown v. Commissioner Docket No. 35476. United States Tax Court 1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 143 ; 12 T.C.M. (CCH) 948 ; T.C.M. (RIA) 53281 ; August 20, 1953 *143 1. … Brown. On December 31, 1942, the petitioner and Clarence R. Brown executed a document entitled "Property Settlement Agreement" (hereinafter referred to as the "1942 agreement").

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished
  • Catherine A. Shephard v. Eric K. Shinseki

    26 Vet. App. 159 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 27, 2013

    West, 11 Vet.App. 228, 236-37 (1998); Villeza v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 353, 357-58 (1996), appeal dismissed, 114 F.3d 1206 (Fed. Cir. 1997); United States v. M. … See Appellant's Br. at 15; Secretary's Br. at 21-22; see also Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995). The Court agrees.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sherman v. Commissioner

    29 B.T.A. 616 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 21, 1933

    The *617 parties have filed a stipulation which, the Board has accepted and from which the material facts are summarized as follows: The petitioner is, and lor a long time prior to the taxable year, was the wife of Frederick … Estate of Leiter, 164 Cal. 181 ; 128 Pac. 334 ; Olson v. Superior Court, 175 Cal. 250 ; 165 Pac. 706 ; Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 ; 147 Pac. 1168 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Samuel L. Mayhue v. Eric K. Shinseki

    24 Vet. App. 273 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 18, 2011

    Mayhue's assertion, where, as here, the Board concludes that the evidence is not in equipoise, specific consideration of § 4.3 is not warranted. See Schoolman v. … See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table); Gilbert, 1 Vet.App. at 57. III.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • In re Winton

    159 F.2d 760 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 11, 1947

    Hatfield, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 4 and 6 in … For the reasons stated, the decision of the Board of Appeals is modi fied, being affirmed as to claim 4 and reversed as to claim 6.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Antonio Pacheco v. Sloan D. Gibson

    27 Vet. App. 21 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 17, 2014

    Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (“The meaning — or ambiguity— of certain words or phrases may only become evident when placed in context.”); Brown v. … . § 7111 (e) (stating that a request for revision of a Board decision based on CUE shall be submitted directly to the Board); Andre v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Ventress v. United States

    9 Ct. Cl. 508 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1873

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eicherv. McDonald

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 19, 2017

    Brown, 9 Vet.App. 369, 377 (1996) (quoting McTighe v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 29, 30 (1994)). … Owings v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 17, 23 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Board of the Young Men's Christian Associations v. United States

    396 F.2d 467 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1968

    In United States v. … Justice Field in United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Marshall v. Commissioner

    1 T.C. 442 · United States Tax Court · Jan 12, 1943

    Compare, however, Commissioner v. Buck, 120 Fed. (2d) 775; Helvering v. Bok, 132 Fed. (2d) 365, affirming Mary Louise Bok, 46 B. T. A. 678; and Brown v. Commissioner, 131 Fed. (2d) 640, affirming Antoinette K. … Brown, 46 B. T. A. 782.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Flemming v. Principi

    16 Vet. App. 52 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 4, 2002

    IVERS, Judge: On April 2, 1999, the Court, in a single-judge order, vacated a July 29, 1997, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision and remanded the matter on appeal to the Board for readjudication. … In Sumner , the Court addressed its decision in Stillwell v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291 (1994), its pre-Buckhannon seminal decision defining an EAJA prevailing party.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cochran Co. v. United States

    10 Ct. Cust. 62 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 10, 1920

    United States v. Gage Bros. & Co. ( 8 Ct. Cust. Appls., 306 ; T. D. 37584); Bayersdorfer & Co. v. United States ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 446 ; T. D; 33875); United States v. International Forwarding Co. ( 8 Ct. Cust. … The decisions of Board 1 as to protests 837745 and 849479, of the’ R. L. Cochran Co., are affirmed. The decisions of Boards 1, 2, and 3, as to the protests of A. & H.

    Cited 35 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.