Case law

Blount Brothers Construction Company v. The United States

346 F.2d 962 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965

The other factual findings of the Board are accepted; the court is not substituting its own view of the facts. See Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 345 F.2d 833 , decided May 14, 1965. … Corp. v. United States, 162 F.Supp. 190 , 192, 142 Ct.Cl. 731, 734 (1958); Jefferson Constr. Co. v.

Jack v. Commissioner

13 B.T.A. 726 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 2, 1928

Brown, owned one-half of the accounts receivable of the partnership and that on dissolution petitioner purchased his interest therein, paying therefor their face value. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Ronald v. Garner v. Dat P. Tran

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 26, 2021

Brown, 6 Vet.App. 405, 407 (1994)), and "sufficiently inform[s] the Board of a medical expert's judgment on a medical question and the essential rationale for that opinion," Monzingo v. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990).

C-T-L

25 I. & N. Dec. 341 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 2010

Food and Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. at 133 (quoting Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., 513 U.S. 561, 569 (1995), and FTC v. … See Food and Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. at 133; see also Matter of Moncada, 24 I&N Dec. at 65.

Hamer v. White

143 F.2d 987 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 19, 1944

D. 37; Clement v. McQuarrie et al., 298 O. G. 1081 , 1922 C. D. 92, 51 App. D. C. 278; Brown v. Edeler et al., 519 O. G. 222 , 1940 C. D. 429, 27 C. C. P. A. 1091.) … We find no error in the board’s holding on that issue. The decision of the board is affirmed.

Robert J. McDonald v. R. James Nicholson

21 Vet. App. 257 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 24, 2007

McDonald appealed from a July 18, 2005, Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) decision denying increased ratings for multiple shell fragment wounds. … Elcyzyn v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 170, 179 (1994) (quoting Levernier Const., Inc. v. United States, 947 F.2d 497 (Fed. Cir. 1991)). Fees for attorneys are statutorily capped at the rate of $125.00 per hour plus a COLA.

Hurd v. West

13 Vet. App. 449 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 25, 2000

. § 5110(b)(2); see Hazan v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 511 (1997). The Court reviews the Board's determination as to the effective date of an award under the "clearly erroneous" standard of review. Stewart v. … Brown, 10 Vet.App. 15 (1997). Under this standard, the Court must affirm the Board's findings if there is a "plausible basis" in the record. Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990).

Maria R. Rodriguez v. R. James Nicholson

19 Vet. App. 275 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 5, 2005

Brown, 6 Vet.App. 242, 245 (1994). … See Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 533-34 (1995).

Lane v. West

11 Vet. App. 412 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 31, 1998

See Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528 (1993), aff'd, 39 F.3d 1574 (Fed.Cir.1994). … Kerr v. United States District Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 , 96 S.Ct. 2119 , 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976).

Rotograph Co. v. United States

1 Ct. Cust. 82 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1910

See Brown v. Piper ( 91 U. S., 37, 40 ); Nix v. Hedden ( 149 U. S., 304, 306 ). … Justice Swayne, in Brown v.

Application of Masao Yamaura

329 F.2d 1017 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 9, 1964

or Brandt. ft The board sustained the examiner on all of the grounds of rejection, stating, however, that the examiner had not applied “the Brown and Brandt references so they appear to be merely cumulative.” … We perceive no reversible error in the failure of the examiner and the board to find basis for patentability in the tests set forth in the specification. The decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed. 1 .

University of South Florida Board of Trustees v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2019

Brown, Senior Litigation Counsel, with whom were Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, and Gary L. … See, e.g., Berges v.

Briddell v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 267 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 23, 2002

See Jackson v. West, [ 12 Vet.App. 422, 429 (1999) ]; Elcyzyn v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 170, 175 (1994) (“only one determination of lack of substantial justification with respect to the entire matter need be made”). … See, e.g., Lematta v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 504, 510 (1996) (citing Perket v.

Neumann v. West

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 21, 2000

Grottveit v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 91, 92-93 (1993). … See Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 426, 430 (1994).

Eckert Packing Co. v. Commissioner

42 B.T.A. 1000 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 18, 1940

Brown, supra; and see Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co., 15 B. T. A. 1401. … Bergan v. Commissioner, supra; Leach v. Commissioner, supra; Inland Products Co. v. Blair, supra; Bohemian Breweries, Inc. v. United States, supra; Philip C. Brown, supra; Elsie S. Eckstein, supra.

Westphal v. Fawzi

666 F.2d 575 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 10, 1981

We agree with the conclusion of the board that Westphal did not thereby raise an issue ancillary to priority and that the board therefore need not consider it. Anderson v. … Brown Co., 431 F.2d 1074 , 167 USPQ 129 (CA 6 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 956 , 91 S.Ct. 977 , 28 L.Ed.2d 239 , 168 USPQ 737 (1971); Pursche v.

JJJ Corp. v. United States

576 F.2d 327 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1978

Defendant relies upon Alex Brown, Inc. v. … Alex Brown, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra, 60 T.C. at 368 .

Cushman Chuck Co. v. Commissioner

8 B.T.A. 148 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 22, 1927

Browning Co., 6 B. T. A. 914. … The contracts were paid in to the petitioner corporation by the Brownings without any consideration therefor except the nominal consideration of one dollar, and under the decision of this Board in the Appeal of Herald-Despatch

Gould v. Commissioner

40 B.T.A. 6 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 1, 1939

Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283 ; Relvering v. Independent Life Insurance Co., 292 U. S. 371 . … Nortz v. United States, 295 U. S. 317 ; Grant v. United States, 7 Wall. 311, 338 ; Marion & Rye Valley Ry. Co. v. United States, 270 U. S. 280 .

Steve W. Mountford v. Eric K. Shinseki

24 Vet. App. 443 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 21, 2011

The Court’s inquiry into the proper interpretation of section 5313B is a question of law, and the Court reviews the Board’s interpretation de novo. See Butts v. … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 539 (1993) (en banc); see also Hensley v. West, 212 F.3d 1255, 1262-64 (Fed.Cir.2000) (discussing proper application of de novo review). II. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES A. The Appellant Mr.