Case law

J. M. & M. S. Browning Co. v. Commissioner

6 B.T.A. 914 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 19, 1927

Browning, and as to the Brownings, the right to receive royalties thereunder. We have heretofore held in the Appeal of Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co., 1 B. T. … The contracts were paid in to the petitioner corporation by the Brownings without any consideration therefor except the nominal consideration of one dollar, and under the decision of this Board in the Appeal of Herald-Despatch

05-13 994

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jul 29, 2016

. § 3.303 (d); see also Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1043 (Fed. Cir. 1994). The Board must consider all the evidence of record and make appropriate determinations of competence, credibility, and weight. … See Robinette v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 69, 77 (1995). In the instant appeal, the December 2010 medical opinion is the most probative evidence of record and the Veteran fails to fulfill the nexus requirement.

Board of Field Officers of South Carolina Troops v. United States

20 Ct. Cl. 18 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 12, 1885

R., 280 ; Carlisle & Henderson v. The United States, 16 Wall., 147 , 8 C. Cls. R., 153 ; United States v Insurance Co., 22 Wall., 99 .)

Steve W. Mountford v. Eric K. Shinseki

24 Vet. App. 443 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 21, 2011

The Court’s inquiry into the proper interpretation of section 5313B is a question of law, and the Court reviews the Board’s interpretation de novo. See Butts v. … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 539 (1993) (en banc); see also Hensley v. West, 212 F.3d 1255, 1262-64 (Fed.Cir.2000) (discussing proper application of de novo review). II. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES A. The Appellant Mr.

Roche v. District of Columbia

18 Ct. Cl. 217 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 5, 1883

(Bond et al. v. Newark, 19 N. J., 376; State et al. v. Hoboken, 36 N. J. Law R., 378; Schman v. Seymour, 24 N. J. Equity R., 143; Hodges v. Buffalo, 2 Denio, 110 .) … R., 127 ; Adams's Case, ibid., 364; Brown’s Case, ibid., 420.)

Glover Norvell v. James B. Peake

22 Vet. App. 194 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 14, 2008

See, e.g., Waterhouse v. Principi, 3 Vet.App. 473, 474-76 (1992); see also Haines v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 446, 446-47 (1997) (quoting Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42, 49 (1994)). … Cir. 1992) (holding that challenges to a court's jurisdiction may be raised at any time); Barnett v. Brown, 83 F.3d 1380, 1383 (Fed.

William Rickett v. Eric K. Shinseki

26 Vet. App. 210 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 12, 2013

However, later Federal Circuit precedents — namely, Brandenburg v. Principi, 371 F.3d 1362 (Fed.Cir.2004) (NOA misfiled at Board), and Bailey (Edward) v. … Brown, 8 Vet.App. 305, 307 (1995). The Federal Circuit in Bailey (Harold) v.

Clean by Lucy, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Mar 1, 2016

Lucy Brown. … Brown's signature.

Pauline Prickett v. R. James Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 370 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 11, 2006

In support of her allegations, she cites to a line of this Court’s decisions beginning with Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119 (1993). … A year later, in Austin v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 547 (1994), the Court clarified and expanded upon Thurber’s holding.

Gould v. Commissioner

40 B.T.A. 6 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 1, 1939

Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283 ; Relvering v. Independent Life Insurance Co., 292 U. S. 371 . … Nortz v. United States, 295 U. S. 317 ; Grant v. United States, 7 Wall. 311, 338 ; Marion & Rye Valley Ry. Co. v. United States, 270 U. S. 280 .

Linville v. West

11 Vet. App. 60 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 3, 1998

Brown, 37 F.3d 618 (Fed.Cir.1994). … In Rosler v.

University of South Florida Board of Trustees v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2019

Brown, Senior Litigation Counsel, with whom were Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, and Gary L. … See, e.g., Berges v.

Harris v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 418 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1984

United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969); Quality Furniture Rentals v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 136, 139 (1983) (Kozinski, C.J.). … United States v. John C. Grimberg Co., 702 F.2d 1362 (Fed.Cir.1983); Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31, 48 (1983) (Gibson, J.); Public Service Co. of Colorado v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 380, 383 (1983) (Seto, J.).

Robert L. Stinson v. Douglas A. Collins

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 24, 2025

See Halpern v. Principi, 384 F.3d 1297, 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Jones v. Brown, 41 F.3d 634, 637 (Fed. Cir.1994). We next confront the question of Mr. … McDonough, 36 Vet.App. 157, 174 (2023) (explaining that the Board must discuss all evidence potentially favorable to the veteran) (citing Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed.

William C. Rickett v. Robert A. McDonald

27 Vet. App. 240 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 10, 2015

See Padgett v. Nicholson, 473 F.3d 1364, 1369-70 (Fed.Cir.2007); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42, 53-54 (1994); see also Phillips v. … See Leavey v.

Raymond F. Pauley v. The United States

440 F.2d 426 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1971

But the provision is flexible and, as pointed out in Browning v. … See Browning v. United States, swpra. In Browning the plaintiff, also an employee of the Department of Agriculture, was separated for failure to accept reassignment.

Sanders v. District of Columbia

20 Ct. Cl. 337 · United States Court of Claims · May 18, 1885

Nelson, seeks to recover a sum of money retained by the Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and alleged to be due under the terms of a paving contract made by said Nelson with the Board of Public Works. … (Brown et al. v. The District of Columbia, 17 C. Cls. R., 402 .)

Tony W. Robertson v. Eric K. Shinseki

26 Vet. App. 169 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 15, 2013

See Eddy v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 52, 57 (1996). On appeal, Mr. … Holmes v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 38, 40 (1997).

Hurd v. West

13 Vet. App. 449 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 25, 2000

. § 5110(b)(2); see Hazan v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 511 (1997). The Court reviews the Board's determination as to the effective date of an award under the "clearly erroneous" standard of review. Stewart v. … Brown, 10 Vet.App. 15 (1997). Under this standard, the Court must affirm the Board's findings if there is a "plausible basis" in the record. Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990).

Michigan Chemical Corp. v. Renegotiation Bd.

49 T.C. 488 · United States Tax Court · Feb 19, 1968

Respondent relies, in part, on Morgan Construction Co. v. Secretary of War, 11 T.C. 764 (1948). … Renegotiation Board Regs. sec. 1453.2(b) (3).