Case law

McGrath v. Gober

14 Vet. App. 28 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 16, 2000

See Bucklinger v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 435, 436 (1993). B. … Brown, 10 Vet.App. 80, 84 (1997). The Court may not reject the Board’s conclusion if it is supported by a plausible basis in the record. Sanders v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 88, 90 (1990); Gilbert v.

William A. Smith Contracting Co., Inc. Of Missouri, and Brown & Root, Inc. v. United States

292 F.2d 847 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

United States v. Howard P. Foley Co., 1946, 329 U.S. 64 , 67 S.Ct. 154 , 91 L.Ed. 44 . … Fuller Co. v. United States, 1947, 69 F.Supp. 409, 415 , 108 Ct.Cl. 70 , where the Government was tardy, without “an excusable reason,” in furnishing models for the Archives Building; Kehm Corporation v.

13-15 085

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 15, 2017

Accordingly, the Board finds that there has been substantial compliance with the prior remand instructions and no further action is necessary. See D'Aries v. Peake, 22 Vet. … After a careful review of the file, the Board finds that all necessary development has been accomplished, and therefore appellate review may proceed without prejudice to the Veteran. See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet.

Arthur D. Roebuck v. R. James Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 307 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 22, 2006

We note that this holding is consistent with our determination in Ashford v. Brown with regard to Mr. … See Ford v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 531, 535 (1997); Bucklinger v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 435, 436 (1993) (holding that issues not raised in appellant's briefing before this Court are deemed abandoned). B.

Archbold v. Commissioner

42 B.T.A. 453 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 31, 1940

The parties have filed a stipulation of the facts which the Board hereby adopts as its findings of fact. The petitioner and Elizabeth Brown were married on January 1, 1937. … The Board held in Bennet B. Bristol, 42 B. T.

McManaway v. Principi

14 Vet. App. 275 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 22, 2001

See McCormick v. … See Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 533-34 (1995). On remand, the appellant will be free to submit additional evidence and argument on the remanded claims in accordance with Kutscherousky v.

Richard C. Raugust v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 475 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 11, 2010

Talon v. Brown, 999 F.2d 514, 517 (Fed. Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 643 (1993) (citing United States R.R. Retirement Bd. v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166, 176 (1980)); Califano v. Torres, 435 U.S. 1, 5 (1978). … Saunders v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 320, 325 (1993) (quoting Fritz, 449 U.S. at 177).

Wo v. United States

15 Ct. Cust. 337 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 5, 1927

The Board of General Appraisers sustained the protest. We reversed their judgment. … In United States v. Shing Shun & Co., 2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 388 , T.

Computer Wholesale Corp.

566 F.2d 1189 · United States Court of Claims · May 27, 1977

Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530, 557 (1962); Austin v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 (1975); Eastport S.S. Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct. … If plaintiff had pleaded a proper claim, defendant would be able to claim a setoff or counterclaim for the liquidated damages under 28 U.S.C. § 1503 or § 2508. *789 Brown v. United States, 207 Ct.

Bowen v. Commissioner

37 B.T.A. 412 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 23, 1938

The form of this statement is to the same effect as that used in the Brown case. … This Board has frequently had before it cases where owners of bonds and other like evidences of indebtedness have accepted for such bonds or indebtedness other forms of property.

Military Aircraft Parts

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Feb 25, 2015

Brown, Inc., an independent engineering and testing laboratory, and found to meet the dimensional requirement. … In Brickwood, the Federal Circuit applied the Supreme Court's decision in Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va.

Jefferson Construction Co. v. United States

151 Ct. Cl. 75 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1960

Browne and Associates (hereinafter referred to as “Browne”) to prepare the plans and specifications, under the supervision of the District. … Upon completion of Browne’s draft of the specifications, Browne then submitted it to the District for review and approval. 7.

Brister & Koester Lumber Corp. v. United States

90 F. Supp. 695 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1950

Merritt v. United States, 267 U.S. 338 , 45 S.Ct. 278 , 69 L.Ed. 643 ; Continental Illinois National Bank et al. v. United States, 81 F.Supp. 596 , 112 Ct.Cl. 563 ; Petrin et al. v. United States, 90 Ct.Cl. 670 ; H. … I-Iyde Park Clothes, Inc. v. United States, supra.

Garry J. Augustine v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 505 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 23, 2004

Secretary's Brief (Br.) at 8 (citing Shipwash v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 218, 221 (1995)). … See Eddy v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 52, 57 (1996).

Appeal of Bernstein

6 B.T.A. 323 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 26, 1927

The record is convincing that the leases, whether those acquired by the Mohawk Oil Co. from it predecessor partnership, Brown and Dyer, or those acquired under assignment from Brown and Bernstein, had no substantial value … The question before the Board is, Did Bernstein and his wife acquire, in the year 1919, any gain out of these transactions?

Shoemaker v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 248 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 21, 1992

; Ohland v. … See Brown (Clem) v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 444, 448 (1992); Murincsak v.

Zimmerman Steel Co. v. Commissioner

45 B.T.A. 1041 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 17, 1941

Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 ; Welch v. Helvering, 290 U. S. 111 ; Burnet v. Houston, 283 U. S. 223 . The reasons given by the respondent for his action “do not constitute or confine the issues.” James P. … Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 . The books of petitioner were kept on an accrual basis. The Bettendorf Co. made various cash advances to petitioner over a period of many years.

Green v. West

11 Vet. App. 472 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 7, 1998

See DeSousa v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 461, 465-67 (1997); Karnas v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 308, 313 (1991). … See Vettese v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 31, 34-35 (1994) (“claim for TDIU presupposes that the rating for the condition is less than 100%”); Holland v.

Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County v. United States

47 Fed. Cl. 714 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 28, 2000

Board of County Supervisors v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 205 (1991). … Board of County Supervisors v. United States, 27 Fed.Cl. 339, 348 (1992).

Catton, Neill & Co. v. United States

11 Ct. Cust. 278 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 31, 1922

See United States v. Boker ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 243 ; T. D. 35472); United States v. American Express Co., (id. 494; T. D. 36124); Brown v. United States (7 id. 309 ; T. D. 36871); Richardson v. … —United States v. Wells (77 Red. 411).