Case law

Sears v. Principi

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 20, 2002

ANALYSIS A Board determination of the proper effective date is a finding of fact. See Lalonde v. West, 12 Vet.App. 377, 380 (1999); Hanson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 29, 32 (1996). … See Appellant's Br. at 9 (citing Flash v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 332, 340 (1995); Lapier v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 215, 216-17 (1993); Spencer v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 283, 293 (1993), aff'd, 17 F.3d 368 (Fed. Cir. 1994); Rowell v.

Esgate v. United States

186 Ct. Cl. 207 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

Brown v. United States, 184 Ct. Cl. 501, 516 , 396 F. 2d 989, 999 (1968). We take that course and grant defendant’s motion because, as already said, the Board’s decision must be upheld on the existing record. … See McEaddy v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 311, 327-29 (1961) ; Stephens v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 365, 369 , 358 F. 2d 951, 952 (1966).

William E. McCreary v. R. James Nicholson

19 Vet. App. 324 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 2, 2005

(quoting Barnett v. Brown, 83 F.3d 1380, 1383 (Fed. Cir. 1996))). … Brown, 9 Vet.App. 11, 15-16 (1996); see also 11 U.S. VET . APP . R. 3(c)(2) (NOA must "reasonably identify the Board decision appealed from").

Philip G. Cline v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 30, 2013

.; see Locher v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 535, 537 (1996); ZP v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 303, 304 (1995). … See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A); Ussery v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 51, 53 (1997).

Mil-Tech Systems, Inc. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,719 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 3, 1984

Charles Brown’s resignation from Mil-Tech was presented at the September 18 meeting, and three of ATACS’ five-member board became the new directors of Mil-Tech. … Steinthal & Co. v. Seamans, 455 F.2d at 1305 ; Scanwell Laboratories v. Shaffer, 424 F.2d 859, 864 (D.C.Cir.1970); International Association of Firefighters, Local F-100 v.

Dobbin v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 323 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 11, 2001

Brown, 10 Vet.App. 171, 175 (1997). … See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995). In addition, the Board decision here on appeal also provided adequate reasons and bases as to why the appellant's arguments did not establish CUE.

L

9 I. & N. Dec. 82 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Jul 1, 1960

MATTER OF ir- In DEPORTATION Proceedings A-11769123 Decided by Board September V, 1960 Presumption of Ian ful CPR 101.1(i) (formerly … He was reemployed on his return by Brown, Pacific, Maxon.

Jeffery A. Wells v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 33 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 11, 2004

See also Harder v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 183, 189 (1993) (citing Karnas v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 308, 311 (1991)); Barnhill v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 75, 77 (1993). … See, e.g., Abrams v. Brown, No. 92-435, 1993 WL 382114 (Vet. App. Sept. 22, 1993); Moon v. Brown, No. 91-2044, 1994 WL 44139 (Vet. App. Feb. 01, 1994).

Martin v. Commissioner

23 T.C. 725 · United States Tax Court · Jan 27, 1955

S. 35, 45 ; Blair v. Commissioner, 300 U. S. 10 ; Uterhart v. United States, 240 U. S. 598, 603 ; Helvering v. Bullard, 303 U. S. 297 ; Sharpe v. Commissioner, 107 F. 2d 13 , certiorari denied 309 U. … In Princess Lida v. Thompson, 305 U.

Crystal D. Southall-Norman v. Robert A. McDonald

28 Vet. App. 346 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 15, 2016

Tropf v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 317, 320 (2006) (quoting Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994)); see Pacheco v. Gibson, 27 Vet.App. 21, 25 (2014) (en banc). … Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table).

Meek v. Principi

14 Vet. App. 322 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 17, 2001

See Baker v. West, 11 Vet.App. 163 (1998); Dudnick v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 79 (1997). Accordingly, a remand is required. … . § 5101 note) (requiring Secretary to provide for "expeditious treatment" of claims remanded by the Board or Court); Drosky v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 251 (1997).

Mortsell v. Laurila

301 F.2d 947 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 4, 1962

We do not attempt to distinguish the instant case from that of Brown, Jr. v. … In the Smith case this court did not mention the Brown, Jr. case but instead quoted with approval the board’s statement that: * * * [sic] It is well settled in interference practice that rights of priority cannot be defeated

Shepard v. West

11 Vet. App. 518 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 22, 1998

See Davis v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 298, 303 (1994). … Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42, 54 (1994); see Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed.Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 2478 , 138 L.Ed.2d 988 (1997).

Fred W. Foster v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 20, 2021

He cites Brown v. Brown, which found that § 4.1, in addition to §§ 4.2 and 4.13, 64 See 59 Fed. Reg. 2523, 2525-26 (1994) (amending the note accompanying DC 7528); 65 Fed. … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 413, 420 (1993). 68 Barr v.

Ozer v. Principi

16 Vet. App. 88 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 24, 2002

Ozer v. Principi, 14 Vet.App. 257, 258 (2001). … See Felton v.

Sullivan v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 21, 2022

See 28 U.S.C. § 1491; Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (first citing 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a); then Keene Corp. v. … Cir. 2006)) (“[A]ny argument not previously raised before the corrections board is waived.”); United States v. L.A.

David A. Mays v. Eric K. Shinseki

25 Vet. App. 256 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 22, 2012

Ass'n v. Bowen, 485 U.S. 399, 403-05 (1998))), aff'd sub nom. Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1993), aff'd, 513 U.S. 115, 115 (1994). … See Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 122-123 (1993) (citing Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976)).

Angel v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 12, 2023

Brown Park Ests.-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1455 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (quoting Brighton Vill. Assocs. v. United States, 52 F.3d 1056, 1060 (Fed. Cir. 1995)). … For an example of a claim that accrued at the time of a single, distinct event, even though the government action had lingering ill effects for the plaintiff over time, the Federal Circuit in Brown Park referenced Hart v.

Millard v. Commissioner

5 B.T.A. 294 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 30, 1926

Brown, and Charles P. Wheeler were the principal stockholders of Pickands, Brown & Co. The company had 15,000 shares of capital stock outstanding during 1916 and for the years prior thereto. … On December 19, 1916, by resolution of the board of directors, these securities were authorized to be distributed among all the stockholders.

Bateson v. United States

51 Fed. Cl. 557 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 28, 2002

The AFBCMR secured advisory opinions pertaining to Majors Brown and Seward from the Office of the Selection Board Secretariat. … v.