Case law

Ada Bobbitt v. Anthony J. Principi

17 Vet. App. 547 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 15, 2004

See McNutt v. G.M.A.C., 298 U.S. 178 (1936); Bethea v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 252 (1992). This Court "does not have jurisdiction over an appeal from an adverse Board decision without a timely notice of appeal." Butler v. … Cir. 2001); see 38 U.S.C. § 7266; Martin v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 100, 101-02 (1997) (per curiam order).

Thayer v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 204 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 4, 2001

Thayer v. Gober, 14 Vet.App. 181 (2000) (per curiam order). After those responses were filed, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Buckhannon Board and Care Home v. … See 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(A), (1)(B), (2)(B); Fritz v. West, 13 Vet.App. 190, 195 (1999); Chesser v. West, 11 Vet.App. 497, 499 (1998); Bazalo v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 304, 308 (1996), rev'd sub nom. Bazalo v.

Springer v. West

11 Vet. App. 38 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 23, 1998

See also Martin v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 196, 198 (1994). … In statutory interpretation, if “the plain meaning of the statute is discernible, that ‘plain meaning must be given effect.’ ” Walker v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 356, 358 (1995); see also Brown v.

Hangzhou Mengku Technology Co., Ltd and Fuzhou Mengku Technology Co., Ltd v. Shanghai Zhenglang Technology Co., Ltd

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Dec 30, 2024

These 7 columns contain tan cubes, and wedged within the middle three columns is a T shape comprised of brown shaded cubes with a brown outline. … v.

Meadows v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 396 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 17, 1924

In considering this question, it may be noted that both the importer and the Government cite and rely upon United States v. Brown ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 189 ; T. D. 31943); United States v. Fenton ( 5 Ct. Cust. … In United States v. Shallus ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 332 ; T.

Zerwekh v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 521 · United States Customs Court · Jun 5, 1961

Lawrence M. Tropf v. R. James Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 4, 2006

See Ford v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 531, 535 (1997) (claims not argued on appeal are deemed abandoned); Bucklinger v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 435, 436 (1993). … Smith v. Nicholson, 19 Vet.App. 63, 75 (2005); Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 259, 261 (1994).

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 28, 2018

(KBR) has filed "Appellant's Motion to Amend the Board's March 15, 2018 Judgment," referring to the Board's March 15, 2018 post-hearing decision in this appeal, Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., ASBCA No. 58175, 18-1 BCA … of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Charles L. Breedlove Brenda Breedlove v. Eric K. Shinseki

24 Vet. App. 7 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 10, 2010

Brown, 9 Vet.App. 369, 371 (1996) (quoting Ta llman v. … Principi, 4 Vet.App. 32 (1993) (substituting veteran’s spouse as the appellant); see also Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42, 47 (1994) (noting routine practice).

Esperson v. Commissioner

13 B.T.A. 596 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 27, 1928

Brown. Peters was Esperson’s secretary and Brown his brother-in-law. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent. GreeN dissents on the first point.

Application of George R. Harris

399 F.2d 245 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 3, 1968

Harris appeals from the decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejections of claims 25-28 in his application 1 as “based upon an insufficient disclosure” and as “unpat-entable over Soday 2 in view … The examiner noted that Soday discloses natural or synthetic rubber compositions containing a blend of high boiling aromatic oils and sulfur-vulcanized brown vegetable oils.

United States v. Brandenstein & Co.

8 Ct. Cust. 435 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 31, 1918

The Board of General Appraisers sustained the protest and the Government appealed. … The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed. .

Ildefonso R. Ricafort v. R. James Nicholson

21 Vet. App. 198 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 7, 2007

Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 539 (1993) (en banc); see also Hensley v. West, 212 F.3d 1255, 1263-64 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (discussing the Court's de novo review authority). … Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994). Section 3.669(d)(1) specifically and unambiguously prohibits the assignment of an effective date earlier than the date of the pardon.

William J. Tedesco, Jr. v. Robert L. Wilkie

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 16, 2019

Tropf, 20 Vet.App. at 320 (quoting Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994)). … DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202, 206-07 (1995). Additionally, in Burton v.

Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. United States

20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1422 · United States Court of International Trade · Dec 9, 1996

Stanford relies upon Ataka America, Inc. v. United States, 79 Cust. Ct. 135, 137 (1977), for the proposition that an original liquidation is only nullified as to the question with which the reliquidation dealt. … Moreover, the facts here are analogous to the facts presented in Sanyo Elec., Inc. v. United States, 81 Cust. Ct. 114, 114 (1978).

BELTRAND-RODRIGUEZ

29 I. & N. Dec. 76 · Board of Immigration Appeals · Mar 27, 2025

Brown, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: MALPHRUS, Deputy Chief Appellate Immigration Judge; PETTY and GOODWIN, Appellate Immigration Judges. … See McKune v.

Charlotte Reliford v. Robert A. McDonald

27 Vet. App. 297 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 20, 2015

Brown, 4 Vet.App. 384, 394 (1993) (holding the Board must either obtain a waiver or determine whether a claimant will be prejudiced by the Board’s adjudication of a question or issue in an appeal not otherwise decided by … Beverly v.

10-21 556

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Feb 27, 2015

Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163, 1166 -67 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 505 (1995). … See Dyment v. West, 13 Vet. App. 141, 146-147 (1999) (remand not required under Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. App. 268 (1998) where Board's remand instructions were substantially complied with); Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet.

Maddalino v. West

13 Vet. App. 475 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 9, 2000

See Grivois v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 100, 101 (1994). … See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); Chesser v. West, 11 Vet.App. 497, 499 (1998); Bazalo v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 304, 308 (1996) (en banc), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Bazalo v. West, 150 F.3d 1380, 1384 (Fed.

Catherine Roberson v. Eric K. Shinseki

22 Vet. App. 358 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 4, 2009

See Brown v. … Similarly, a Board determination concerning the degree of disability under the rating code is a finding of fact. Johnston v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 80, 84 (1994); see also Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 53 (1990).