Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.49s
94 Fed. Cl. 779 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 28, 2010
Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 748 (Fed.Cir.1988) (citing Zunamon v. Brown, 418 F.2d 883, 886 (8th Cir.1969)). … The CAVC has exclusive jurisdiction to review' the decisions of the Board. 38 U.S.C. § 7252 (a); Davis v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 556, 559 (1996).
Cited 22 timesPublishedMabel A. Akers v. Anthony J. Principi
17 Vet. App. 561 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 30, 2004
Brown, 4 Vet.App. 225, 229 (1993) (citing Akles v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. … Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, 513 U.S. 18, 26-27 (1994) (setting aside a valid judicial judgment should not turn solely upon agreement of the parties); Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1158 (Fed.
Cited 1 timesPublished13 Vet. App. 287 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 12, 2000
See Buckley v. West, 12 Vet.App. 76, 81 (1998) (citing, inter alia, Degmetich v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 208, 209 (1995), aff'd, 104 F.3d 1328 (Fed. … Id. at 405 (quoting Heuer v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 379, 384 (1995)).
Cited 2 timesPublished11 Ct. Cust. 443 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 22, 1923
Cone v. United States ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 263 ; T. D. 35477). Under tbe tariff act of 1897 these natural seeds were held to be nonenumerated manufactured articles. (T. D. 27257, supra. See also T. … On tbe whole, we think the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers ought to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCosmetically Yours, Inc. v. Clairol Incorporated
424 F.2d 1385 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 7, 1970
Tri-Valley Growers etc. v. Maple Island, Inc., 360 F.2d 248 , 53 CCPA 1217 (1966); Island Road Bottling Company v. Drink-Mor Beverage Co., 140 F.2d 331 , 31 CCPA 816 (1944), and cases cited therein. … Food Specialty Co., Inc. v. Standard Products Co., Inc., 406 F.2d 1397 , 56 CCPA 1005 (1969); Gillette Co. v. “42” Products Ltd., 396 F.2d 1001 , 55 CCPA 1347 (1968). One matter remains.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Mar 31, 2017
See Crowe v. Brown, 7 Vet. … Verdon v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 529 (1996).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2014
ORlGEiSHi In the United States Court of Federal Claims N@. i4-i2ic (Fii@d; Juiy 16, 2014) FREDERICK BROWN, JUL 1 6 2014 Pl¢linfl`]§‘i u.s. cover or= V_ FEoEaAL cLAuvis THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. … Cf Jackson v. United States, 80 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished101 Fed. Cl. 122 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 15, 2011
The agreement acknowledged that DDI could not pay Brown Printing on a current basis. … For a further discussion of the common law roots of this rule, see Cunningham v. Brown, 265 U.S. 1, 12-13 , 44 S.Ct. 424 , 68 L.Ed. 873 (1924); Schuyler v.
Cited 15 timesPublished97 F.2d 93 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 6, 1938
The product of the former is dark brown in color, and that of appellant a much lighter brown. They are both labeled “6:12 Dimethyl Coeroxenol Acetate.” According to their labels they are the same substance. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed.
Cited 3 timesPublished28 Vet. App. 330 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 31, 2017
Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 123 (1993) (emphasis added). … Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456, 1463 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Prior to 1988, a veteran whose claim was rejected by the Board was generally unable to obtain further review. Henderson, 562 U.S. at 432 , 131 S.Ct. 1197 .
Cited 20 timesPublishedBoard of Veterans' Appeals · Jun 30, 2015
For these reasons, the Board finds that there is no credible lay evidence that the Veteran sustained a left knee injury in service from which he has had left knee problems ever since. See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. … See Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedKellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 13, 2015
Throughout 2009, KB RSI was named by military personnel in several additional lawsuits in federal court: Bixby v. KBR Inc. (District of Oregon); Billiter v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc. … ASBCA Nos. 59357, 59358, Appeals of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 Vet. App. 89 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 30, 2002
See 38 U.S.C. § 1541(a); Martin v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 196, 199 (1994); 38 C.F.R. § 3.3(b)(4) (2001). … See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). Here, the Board's statement of the reasons or bases does not address this critical issue.
Cited 2 timesPublished26 B.T.A. 1401 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 31, 1932
In re Brown, supra; Pfleghar Hardware Specialty Co. v. Commissioner, 30 Fed. (2d) 614. … Rotan v. United States, 43 Fed. (2d) 232.
Cited 0 timesPublished12 Vet. App. 304 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 30, 1999
May Marine Supply Co. v. Brunswick Corp., 649 F.2d 1049, 1056 (5th Cir.1981) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 974 , 71 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981); Durango Associates, Inc. v. … See Phillips v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 25, 33 (1997). Accordingly, we read the NOA as having no effect on the remanded claim.
Cited 2 timesPublished23 B.T.A. 736 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 16, 1931
In Willcuts, Collector v. Bunn, 282 U. S. 216 , it was held that profit realized from the disposition of state or municipal bonds is subject to Federal income tax. In Denman v. Slayton, 282 U. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered v/rider Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMargaret R. Russell v. Eric K. Shinseki
25 Vet. App. 26 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 11, 2011
Brown, 8 Vet.App. 305, 307 (1995)); see also Forcier, supra. … Brown, 8 Vet.App. 142, 144 (1995)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDeanna R. Polovick v. Eric K. Shinseki.
23 Vet. App. 48 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 22, 2009
See Stefl v. … When rendering its decision, the Board is statutorily required to provide a statement of reasons or bases for its findings and conclusions. 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995).
Cited 21 timesPublishedMartin D. Spigner III v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 7, 2024
Good Samaritan Hosp. v. Shalala, 508 U.S. 402, 409, (1993); see Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1523 (Fed. Cir. 1994) ("The canons of construction of course apply equally to any legal text and not merely to statutes."). … Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115 (1994) ("Where a statute's language is plain, and its meaning clear, no room exists for construction. There is nothing to construe. ").
Cited 0 timesPublishedGene S. Groves v. Denis McDonough
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 25, 2021
Marciniak v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 198, 201 (1997); see 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(2) (requiring the Court to "take due account of the rule of prejudicial error"); Shinseki v. … Cir. 2000) (table); Berger v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 166, 169 (1997).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna