Case law

United States v. Gertzen Co.

8 Ct. Cust. 428 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 22, 1918

The protest was submitted to the Board of General Appraisers. … United States, supra, and are again discussed in the case of Beuttell & Sons v. United States ( 8 Ct. Cust. Appls., 409 ; T. D. 37666), which case is decided concurrently herewith.

New York Merchandise Co. v. United States

14 Ct. Cust. 256 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 19, 1926

No such finding was made by either General Appraiser Sullivan or General Appraiser Brown. … General Appraiser Brown simply concurred in the legal conclusion reached by his associates without making any finding of fact whatever. This court in United States v. Cabrera Bros., 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 82 , T.

In re Corbin

136 F.2d 713 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 10, 1943

The examiner held the curving of the rear end of the cam rails to be a common expedient where a flight arm runs over the end of the rail “as seen in Brown or Hamachek.” … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed.

Betzaida P. Jernigan v. Eric K. Shinseki

25 Vet. App. 220 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 19, 2012

Robinette v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 69, 79 (1995); see Davis v. … Brown, 9 Vet.App. 29, 32 (1996); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 52 (1990). III.

Margaret Laska v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 6, 2024

Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 429, 433 (1995); Guerrieri v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 467, 471-73 (1993). … The Board's interpretation of a statute is a question of law that the Court reviews de novo. Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 539 (1993) (en banc).

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · May 1, 2019

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 57530, 58161 … of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 57530, 58161, Appeals of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

In re Stack

87 F.2d 210 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 25, 1937

As to the validity of the claim set out above, which was involved in Byron Weston Co. v. L. L. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed.

Clabon Jones v. Eric K. Shinseki

23 Vet. App. 122 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 18, 2009

See Cook v. Principi, 318 F.3d 1340, 1334 (2002) (citing Hauck v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 518 (1994)); Norris v. … See Tablazon v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 359 (1995) (determining that a 1975 RO decision never became final, because without an SOC, the appellant was unable to file an appeal to the Board).

Emilio T. Palomer v. Robert A. McDonald

27 Vet. App. 245 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 18, 2015

Brown, 37 F.3d 618, 620 (Fed.Cir.1994), the Federal Circuit noted that in Patterson , our Court had jurisdiction over the underlying Board decision based on a timely filed NOA. … Mayer, supra; see also Trice v. Brown, 9 Vet.App 245, 246 (1996) (per curiam order) (recognizing that Mayer overruled the Patterson decision regarding jurisdiction over denials of reconsideration by the Board Chairman).

Max Drill, Inc. v. The United States

427 F.2d 1233 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1970

Brown, The Law of Personal Property, 721-722 (2d ed. 1955). The Board found that the storm window frames involved here “were not readily removable” although the glass windows themselves were of a removable type. … Brown, supra, at p. 712. Cf. Roderick v. Sanborn, 106 Me. 159 , 76 A. 263 (1910); Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Jensen, 69 S.D. 225 , 9 N.W.2d 140 (1943).

Suozzi v. West

12 Vet. App. 339 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 16, 1999

Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 , 103 S.Ct. 1933 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983)); Ussery v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 51, 53 (1997). … Elcyzyn v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 170, 176 (1994) (quoting Hensley, 461 U.S. at 433 , 103 S.Ct. 1933 ).

Similes v. West

11 Vet. App. 115 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 13, 1998

Bazalo v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 304, 309 (1996) (en banc) (quoting Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302-03 , 113 S.Ct. 2625, 2632 , 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993)); see also Stillwell v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 291, 300 (1994). … See Shaw, 10 Vet.App. at 501 ; March v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 163, 169 (1994); Cook v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 226, 237 (1994).

De Cicco v. United States

677 F.2d 66 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 24, 1982

Plaintiff relies upon Brown v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 501 , 396 F.2d 989 (1968), to support his position that he is entitled to a trial de novo. … In Johnston v.

Frank v. Commissioner

16 B.T.A. 771 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 28, 1929

Van Fossan: We do not deem it essential to this decision to decide whether or not Brown was an employee of a political subdivision of the State of Ohio. Brown is not the petitioner. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered wnder Bule 60. Maequette, Smith, and Green concur in the result.

Rosalia A. Flores v. R. James Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 8, 2006

See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … See, e.g., Brown v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 40, 42 (1995) (holding Board's determination that veteran's conduct was fraudulent and prevented a waiver of indebtedness is a factual finding); East v.

06-25 660

Board of Veterans' Appeals · Oct 31, 2012

However, as that grant did not represent a total grant of benefits sought on appeal with regard to that issue, the claim for increase remains before the Board. AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35 (1993). … See 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1) (2012); Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337, 338-39 (1996).

Bobby R. Jones v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 500 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 19, 2004

The Board received the appellant's motion for reconsideration on August 27, 2003, which is more than 120 days after the date stamped on the underlying Board decision. Cf. Rosler v. … Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456 (Fed.

St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Commissioner

21 B.T.A. 1201 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 16, 1931

Humes v. United States, 276 U. S. 487 . Cf. Reynolds D. Brown, Administrator, 20 B. T. A. 47. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

In re Coker

463 F.2d 1344 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 17, 1972

The board agreed with the examiner. … In re Brown, 51 CCPA 1254, 329 F. 2d 1006 , 141 USPQ 245 (1964).

In re Fee Agreement of Mason

13 Vet. App. 79 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 6, 1999

Cleary v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 305, 307 (1995). … Brown, 8 Vet.App. 104, 108 (1995); see also Wingo v. West, 11 Vet.App. 307, 312-13 (1998); Gaines v. West, 11 Vet.App. 113, 114 (1998); Shaw v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 498, 503-04 (1997).