Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.36s
50 Pa. D. & C. 235 · Pennsylvania Department of Justice · Mar 15, 1944
deny the board the power to do what it contemplates would be to impute to the legislature a state of mind which not only is not revealed in the pertinent legislation, but which the history and language of such legislation clearly … We are of the opinion that nonproducing breakers are industrial establishments within the meaning of the act.
Cited 0 timesPublishedApplied Research Associates, Inc. and Affiliate v. Commissioner
143 T.C. No. 17 · United States Tax Court · Oct 9, 2014
the Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as he may deem necessary in order that the tax liability of the affiliated group, and of each of its members, may be computed, assessed, and collected in such manner as to clearly … Petitioner’s primary argument is that there is no guidance in the Code, the regulations, or other authority regarding the method of establishing the proper rate or rates of tax on consolidated taxable income where one
Cited 0 timesPublishedCharles L. Breedlove Brenda Breedlove v. Eric K. Shinseki
24 Vet. App. 7 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 10, 2010
To be clear, the adverse effect of a Board decision can be removed by applying the remedy established in Landicho, supra; i.e., by vacating the Board decision and dismissing the appeal. … Finally, when accrued-benefits status is established by decision below or concession by the Secretary, standing is established, and substitution generally will be permitted, subject, as always, to judicial decision that it
Cited 24 timesPublished15 Cl. Ct. 289 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 29, 1988
C. § 6226, had limited its waiver of sovereign immunity for 150 days only and that after that period the United States, as sovereign, was no longer subject to suit. … The plain language of the notice statute clearly rebuts any statements made by IRS personnel concerning the running of the appeal time to file a claim.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDecisionpoint Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 14, 2025
The procurement was set aside for offerors that qualified as “Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses” under NAICS Code 541614 (“qualified small businesses”). AR 381, 1272; see also 13 C.F.R. § 128.401. … P&S was a qualified small business, but Oryza was not. See AR 124.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNutrite Corp. v. United States
43 Fed. Cl. 297 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 1999
It is clearly established that the United States Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over tort claims. See Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 100 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (Ct.Cl.1979). … When privity of contract is present, there exists, “the type of direct, unavoidable contractual liability necessary to trigger a waiver of sovereign immunity....” Id.
Cited 1 timesPublished67 Fed. Cl. 708 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 22, 2005
A credit under Code section 43 for qualifying EOR costs incurred pursuant to qualified EOR projects. We refer to the first eight of these issues as the “non-EOR” claims. … At the outset, we note that defendant urges that there is a fourth element required for a valid informal claim: an express waiver of sovereign immunity.
Cited 11 timesPublished120 T.C. 69 · United States Tax Court · Feb 13, 2003
Section 419(b) limits the deduction for any taxable year to the welfare benefit fund’s “qualified cost”. 15 The fund’s qualified cost is equal to the sum of the fund’s “qualified direct cost” for the year, and, subject to … The language of section 404(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clearly different from the language of 419A(c)(2).
Cited 13 timesPublishedChuisano v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
116 Fed. Cl. 276 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 30, 2014
law; (3) . . . clearly erroneous; or (4) the record contains no evidence on which the . . . … Well-settled principles of sovereign immunity are also a consideration. Cloer II, 675 F.3d at 1367.
Cited 615 timesPublishedHuaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. (30) v. United States Department of Commerce
201 F. Supp. 2d 1351 · United States Court of International Trade · Apr 30, 2002
In other words, “the statement contained in the Notice of Initiation clearly advised [Plaintiffs] that if any of the listed exporters did not qualify for a separate rate, all of the exporters of crawfish tail meat from … not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters . . . who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review . . . .”
Cited 5 timesPublished507 F. Supp. 2d 1305 · United States Court of International Trade · Aug 20, 2007
The Federal Circuit has clearly stated its position on this issue. … Therefore, unclean hands is clearly available to bar any such equitable relief it seeks.
Cited 8 timesPublishedPatricia A. Martin v. Eric K. Shinseki
26 Vet. App. 451 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 28, 2014
scheme, if VA's interpretation of the statute is reasonable, the courts are precluded from substituting their judgment for that of VA, unless the Secretary has exceeded his authority; the Secretary's action was clearly … The veteran did not meet the eligibility requirements for a waiver established in section 1912.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnion Mut. Ins. Co. v. Commissioner
46 T.C. 842 · United States Tax Court · Sep 30, 1966
The petitioner writes fire and other insurance, not including life, and has qualified to transact business as a mutual insurance company in 30 States of the United States and Puerto Rico. … It established and maintains a guaranty fund of $500,000 in order to qualify and do business in the various States and to write policies without contingent liability or contingent premium which would render its policyholders
Cited 3 timesPublishedFarmers Union Co-op Oil Co. v. Commissioner
38 B.T.A. 64 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 13, 1938
Our discussion of whether such requisite facts have been established will follow the numerical order of their statement. 1. … A nonmember had to qualify for membership and pay $10 for a share of petitioner’s capital stock before he could receive payment of a patronage dividend credited to him.
Cited 2 timesPublished19 Cl. Ct. 527 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 22, 1990
Thus by clear implication, interest on claims not covered by contract or clearly enacted statutory provisions is barred. … No statutory provision establishing the right to interest in military pay or retirement cases exists.
Cited 10 timesPublished63 T.C. 267 · United States Tax Court · Nov 26, 1974
Trebotich case (p. 335) that, “Clearly, if the employers merely accumulated the funds in reserve accounts established and controlled by them, the arrangement would not constitute the funding of a qualified plan.” … In our view it is unnecessary to decide whether petitioner is correct in his primary contention that the Civil Service Retirement Act does not establish a qualified plan under section 401(a).
Cited 21 timesPublishedRailway & Express Co. v. United States
56 F.2d 687 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1932
The business was to be “conducted under such rates, charges, classifications, regulations, and practices as are now or may hereafter be lawfully established.” … The evidence establishes, and we have found as a fact, that the so-called qualified common stock of $1,594,000 issued to the Adams Express Company was issued for actual value residing in miscellaneous equipment paid in by
Cited 1 timesPublished121 Fed. Cl. 408 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 4, 2015
After receiving a copy via email on March 26, Saturday, I am disputing the provisions/agreeme'nt not clearly discussed in detail by my attorney, David Kornbluh. … actions were subject to immunity.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHyundai Steel Co. v. United States
659 F. Supp. 3d 1327 · United States Court of International Trade · Sep 29, 2023
Id., art. 14. 10 Hyundai Steel qualified for the full allocation. Hyundai Steel’s NSA Resp., Ex. NSA-1 at 2. … Commerce found that the AAGEP and the Enforcement Decree “establish criteria” that “result in an express statutory limitation on which industries qualify for the additional allocation by setting thresholds that industries
Cited 3 timesPublished12 T.C. 1204 · United States Tax Court · Jun 30, 1949
A.) 72 F. (2d) 883, 884, wherein the court said: “An examination of the standard option clause contained in each contract reveals that the right given the respondent by the option is not absolute but qualified. … court to a number of cases involving leases that contained options to renew wherein it has been held that the entire exhaustion allowance should not be allocated to the comparatively short term of the original lease when it clearly
Cited 36 timesPublished
Ask Donna