Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.67s

  • William E. Frasure , Jr. v. Anthony J. Principi

    18 Vet. App. 379 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 14, 2004

    Brown, 5 Vet.App. 75, 77 (1993); cf. Mariano v. … VA"); see also Soria v. Brown, 118 F.3d 747, 749 (Fed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harris v. West

    13 Vet. App. 509 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 19, 2000

    See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table); see also Elkins v. West, 12 Vet.App. 209, 213 (1999) (en banc) (citing Caluza, supra, and Epps v. … See Elkins, 12 Vet.App. at 219 (citing Robinette v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 69, 75-76 (1995)). The determination whether a claim is well grounded is subject to de novo review by this Court.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Maxwell v. Commissioner

    95 T.C. 107 · United States Tax Court · Jul 31, 1990

    Attorney Brown recommended to the board of directors that Hi Life settle petitioner’s claim for the total sum of $122,500. The board of directors, consisting of Mrs. Maxwell and Mr. … Amborn v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 19 Cal. App. 3d 953, 959 , 97 Cal. Rptr. 466, 470 (1971).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • 10-40 408

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2016

    AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35, 39 (1993). The Veteran submitted a waiver of his right to have the RO review newly submitted evidence and allowing the Board to proceed with an appeal. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. … Floyd v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 88 (1996). Extraschedular consideration involves a three step analysis. Thun v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 111 (2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Santoro v. West

    13 Vet. App. 516 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 30, 2000

    See Townsend v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 258, 259-60 (1996); see also Barnett v. Brown, 4 83 F.3d 1380, 1383 (Fed. … See Mayer v. Brown, 37 F.3d 618, 619 (Fed. Cir. 1994), overruled in part by Bailey, 160 F.3d at 1368.

    Reversed on other grounds by Alfred P. Santoro, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 274 F.3d 1366 (2001)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mariella B. Mason v. Eric K. Shinseki

    26 Vet. App. 1 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 31, 2012

    Sears v. Principi, 349 F.3d 1326, 1331-32 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (considering Brown v. … Assn. v. Bowen, 485 U.S. 399, 403-405 (1988)), aff'd sub nom. Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1993), aff'd sub nom. Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115 (1994).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. Principi

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 26, 2002

    Although it is true that, under Brown v. … Hence, we hold that, under Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 12-02 548

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 31, 2016

    After a careful review of the file, the Board finds that all necessary development has been accomplished, and therefore appellate review may proceed without prejudice to the Veteran. See Bernard v. Brown, 4 Vet. … See 38 C.F.R. § 3.321 (b)(1) (2015); Bagwell v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 337, 338-39 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Paniag v. Gober

    10 Vet. App. 359 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 30, 1997

    On May 21, 1997, the Court issued a panel opinion in Paniag v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 265 (1997), dismissing the appellant’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. … Filing a motion for reconsideration with the Board may toll the 120-day statutory period in which a claimant may file an NOA with this Court. See 38 U.S.C. § 7266 (a); Rosler v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 241, 245 (1991).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Application of Raymond C. Wallace

    376 F.2d 968 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 4, 1967

    Both Evans et al. and Brown et al. disclose the use of rosin to prevent oxidation of metal surfaces, Evans et al. mentioning can ends of tin plate and Brown et al. mentioning aluminum. … The decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Zajicek v. West

    12 Vet. App. 48 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 19, 1998

    In Dudnick v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 397 (1996), the veteran had mailed his motion for reconsideration to the “ ‘Department of Veterans’ Affairs,’ 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20220”. … Johnson (Gary) v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 95, 98 (1994) (quoting Nominations of Jo Ann Krukar Webb, Sylvia Chavez Long, James A. Endicott, Jr., and Allen B.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Menzel & Co.

    9 Ct. Cust. 16 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 26, 1918

    The board sustained the claim for free entry. … See United States v. Dunlop & Ward ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 218 ; T. D. 35505). In this connection see also United States v. Neuman & Schwiers ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 228 ; T. D. 35467).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fulkerson v. West

    12 Vet. App. 268 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 24, 1999

    Barnett v. Brown, 83 F.3d 1380, 1383 (Fed.Cir.1996). … On remand, the Board should take heed of recent developments in the law concerning new and material evidence and should apply the law accordingly. See Hodge v. West, 155 F.3d 1356 (Fed.Cir.1998); Elkins v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jason Seeba v. Department of Justice

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 21, 2023

    Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 (1985). The U.S. … Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 546 (1985).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 10-40 502

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Aug 2, 2016

    As those awards did not represent a total grant of the benefits sought on appeal, the claims for increase remain before the Board. AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35 (1993). … See DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 4.40 (2015); see also 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.45 , 4.59 (2015).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Paul J. Pratt v. R. James Nicholson

    20 Vet. App. 252 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 11, 2006

    Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 120 (1994). … Jones v. Brown, 41 F.3d 634, 638 (Fed. Cir.1994) (quoting Ardestani v. INS, 502 U.S. 129 (1991)); see Gardner, 513 U.S. at 118.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1466 v. Boldt

    513 F.2d 1405 · Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1975

    On appeal appellant again urges that the Board’s decision must be considered in light of additional evidence, which became available subsequently. Appellant’s Br. at 4. This we cannot do. In United States v. … While there are exceptions to this general rule, see, e. g., Brown v. United States, 396 F.2d 989 , 184 Ct.Cl. 501 (1968); Toledano v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 362 F.2d 243 (5th Cir. 1966); Jordan v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Raymond E. Douglas v. Eric K. Shinseki

    23 Vet. App. 19 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 17, 2009

    Brown, 9 Vet.App. 145, 155 (1996) (38 U.S.C. § 5125 is "permissive in nature, although clearly it would not permit the Board to act in an arbitrary and capricious manner in not crediting a claimant's medical evidence"). … See OPM v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Nicholas Matthew Brown and Rebekah Brown v. Commissioner

    2013 T.C. Summary Opinion 21 · United States Tax Court · Mar 4, 2013

    Summary Opinion 2013-21 UNITED STATES TAX COURT NICHOLAS MATTHEW BROWN AND REBEKAH BROWN, Petitioners v. … See Sanford v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 823, 827- 828 (1968), aff’d per curiam, 412 F.2d 201 (2d Cir. 1969); Rasmussen v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-353.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Smith v. West

    12 Vet. App. 312 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 7, 1999

    Evans v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 273, 283 (1996); see also Elkins v. West, 12 Vet.App. 209, 215-217 (1999). … Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 53 (1990).

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.