Case law

Dambach v. Principi

14 Vet. App. 307 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 3, 2001

See Collette v. Brown, 82 F.3d 389 (1996). There is little dispute, however, that the episodes of tonsillitis were documented. The veteran only contends that they were not adequately treated. … Cohen v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 128, 147 (1977).

Falk v. West

12 Vet. App. 402 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 26, 1999

Bucklinger v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 435, 436 (1993); see also Carbino v. … Ardison v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 405, 407, 409 (1994).

Application of the Realistic Company

440 F.2d 1393 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 13, 1971

As appellant points out, citing Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. … Wella Corporation v. La Maur, Inc., 312 F.2d 831 , 50 CCPA 916 (1963). We find the mark CURV’ to be likewise not merely descriptive of appellant’s goods. Accordingly, the decision of the board is reversed. Reversed. .

Roslyn Fuel Co. v. Commissioner

16 B.T.A. 285 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1929

This includes the $26,235.27 paid for the Brown and Linn tracts. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 68 (e).

McDonnell v. United States

59 F.2d 290 · United States Court of Claims · May 31, 1932

Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co., 282 U. S. 295 , 51 S. Ct. 337 , 75 L. Ed. 349 ; Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283 , 51 S. Ct. 3 .40, 143, 75 L, Ed. 343; Aiken v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 277 , 51 S. … Again in Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, supra, the court infers that the last of the three waivers involved in that ease would have been sufficient standing alone.

In re Fessmann

489 F.2d 742 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 10, 1974

Appellant requested reconsideration by the board of its decision. … In Brown , the court was in effect saying that the Patent Office bears a lesser burden of proof in making out a case of prima facie obviousness for product-by-proeess claims because of their peculiar nature than would be

Application of Herman Hoeksema

379 F.2d 1007 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 29, 1967

Appellant’s reliance on the Brown case is unwarranted. … We reversed the board’s decision in that case because the reference itself stated that “Attempts to prepare fluorine-containing silicone homopolymers have been unsuccessful” thus showing Brown’s homopolymers to be not in

Johnson v. West

11 Vet. App. 225 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 22, 1998

E.g., Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42, 47 (1994). … See Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 330, 333 (1997); Landicho, 7 Vet.App. at 47-48, 53-54 .

JJ206, LLC DBA JuJu Joints

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Oct 27, 2016

Carson Found. v. … See generally Christensen v.

Maderia Embroidery Co. v. United States

9 Ct. Cust. 140 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 15, 1919

The case of United States v. Brown ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 189 ; T. … The same principle was affirmed in United States v. Shallus ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 332 ; T. D. 32074) and United States v. Brown ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 102 ; T. D. 33374).

Jimmie L. Dixon v. R. James Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 544 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 22, 2006

See Hensley v. West, 212 F.3d 1255, 1263 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (stating that "appellate tribunals are not appropriate fora for initial fact finding"); Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1244 (Fed. … See Winslow v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 469, 471 (1996) (denying motion for oral argument where Court did not believe it would materially assist in disposition of appeal).

Rocco v. Perciavalle v. Denis McDonough

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 3, 2021

See Fanning v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 225, 230 (1993). … Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 123 (1993); Bernard v.

Heath v. West

11 Vet. App. 400 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 31, 1998

The EAJA Application In Bazalo v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 304, 308 (1996) (en banc), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. Bazalo v. … Bazalo, 9 Vet.App. at 308 ; see Lematta v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 504, 507 (1996).

McDonald v. Commissioner

33 T.C. 540 · United States Tax Court · Dec 21, 1959

Neill, 17 T.C. 1015 ; Doogan v. United States, 154 F. Supp. 703 (S.D. Ohio); and Frye v. United States, 72 F. … Brown, 25 T.C. 220 , where the claimed pensions were disallowed. We agree with the Commissioner.

James E. Savage v. Eric K. Shinseki

24 Vet. App. 259 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 4, 2011

Principi, 15 Vet.App. 1, 12 (2001); DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202, 206 (1995), as proof. None of those cases, however, limits the applicability or rationale of § 4.2 to VA examinations alone. … However, this Court has made clear that "VA and the [Board] possess specialized expertise in identifying and assessing the medical nature of a claimed condition." Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 539 (1993) (en banc).

Stone v. Gober

14 Vet. App. 116 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 11, 2000

Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1043 (Fed. Cir. 1994). The Board denied direct service connection for the veteran's cause of death, cancer of the rectum. R. at 6-7, 10. … Brown, 5 Vet.App. 284, 288 (1993); Browder v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 268, 272 (1993).

William H. Hanlin v. R. James Nicholson

19 Vet. App. 350 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 23, 2005

See Cumby v. West, 4 12 Vet.App. 363 (1999); Golliday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 249, 251 (1994). In this case, the RO determined that the Intervenor is a helpless child. … Barrera v. Gober, 122 F.3d 1030 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Grantham v. 5 Brown, 114 F.3d 1156 (1997); In re Fee Agreement of J.

Lehmann Machine Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp. Price Adjustment Board

10 T.C. 350 · United States Tax Court · Feb 24, 1948

Nathan Cohen v. Secretary of War, 7 T. C. 1002 . It is our opinion that the evidence of record does not afford any basis for setting aside the determination of excessive profits made by the RFC.

Best v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 18 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 15, 2001

Brown, 7 Vet.App. 153, 155 (1994); Mokal v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 12 (1990). … See, e.g., United States v.

Dana Corp. v. United States

470 F.2d 1032 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1972

In Comment number 3 5 contained in its opinion, the Board stated, at p. 38,141, in part: The Board has noted the testimony of witness Brown, a traffic employee for Appellant. While the Board considers Mr. … Brown’s view on the applicability of freight classification his good faith opinion, the Board considers the opinion of the Department’s Mr.