Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

0.80s

  • Flathead Joint Board of Control of Flathead v. United States

    30 Fed. Cl. 287 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 22, 1993

    The Flathead Joint Board of Control, is an incorporated political subdivision formed by the three state-chartered irrigation districts under the statutes of Montana. B. History Of The Flathead Project. 1. … Cooke Corp. v. United States, 27 Fed.Cl. 753, 755 (1993); Brahms v. United States, 18 Cl.Ct. 471, 473 (1989); Hedman v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 304, 306 (1988).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Walter L. Fritz v. R. James Nicholson

    20 Vet. App. 507 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 6, 2006

    Gardner v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 584, 587-88 (1991) (citing Lewis v. United States, 92 U.S. 618 (1876)), aff'd sub nom. Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456 (Fed. … Moffitt v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 214, 225 (1997).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Donald A. Dallman v. Robert L. Wilkie

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Nov 30, 2020

    Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 57 (1990). … DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202, 206-07 (1995).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Michele D. Burden v. Eric K. Shinseki

    25 Vet. App. 178 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 1, 2012

    Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 511 (1995). … See 38 U.S.C. § 7261 (scope of review); Dedicatoria v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 441, 443 (1995) (marriage is a question of fact). Although the line between each standard of review can become blurred, see Elkins v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Damian Reyes v. R. James Nicholson

    21 Vet. App. 370 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 20, 2007

    See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Simon v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 621, 622 (1992); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 57 (1990). … See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff’d per curiam, 78 F.3d. 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table); Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 36, 39-40 (1994); Gilbert, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. West

    11 Vet. App. 240 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 5, 1998

    Duran v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 216, 224 (1994)(emphasis added); see also 38 C.F.R. 20.1104 (“When a determination of the [AOJ] is affirmed by the Board ..., such determination is subsumed by the final appellate decision.”) … Archbold v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 124, 130 (1996) (citations omitted). III.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Robert H. Johnson v. Douglas A. Collins

    United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 26, 2025

    Id. at 8 (citing Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1158-59 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Holland v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 443, 445 (1997)). He notes that Mr. … Spencer v. Brown, 17 F.3d 368, 372 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (Spencer II), aff'ing 4 Vet.App. 283 (1993) (Spencer I).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commissioner

    67 T.C.M. 2101 · United States Tax Court · Feb 3, 1994

    BROWN AND MARTHA L. BROWN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Brown v. Commissioner Docket No. 10077-84 United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1994-43 ; 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 46 ; 67 T.C.M. … Brown and Martha L. Brown, pro se. For respondent: Paul J. Krug. DAWSON; POWELL DAWSON MEMORANDUM OPINION DAWSON, Judge : This case was assigned to Special Trial Judge Carleton D.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jun 16, 2016

    Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. Murphy, No. 2015-1148, slip. op. at 7 (Fed. Cir. May 18, 2016). … of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 58518, 59005, Appeals of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • PharmaCann LLC

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 16, 2017

    Co. v. … Brown, 119 USPQ2d at 1351.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • PharmaCann LLC

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 16, 2017

    Co. v. … Brown, 119 USPQ2d at 1351.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commissioner

    63 T.C.M. 1866 · United States Tax Court · Jan 21, 1992

    BROWN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Brown v. Commissioner Docket No. 903-90 United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1992-40 ; 1992 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 46 ; 63 T.C.M. (CCH) 1866 ; T.C.M. … Deputy v. DuPont , 308 U.S. 488 , 493 (1940) . In support of the claimed excess wage expenses, petitioner offered the testimony of his bookkeeper, Renee Manning (Manning).

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Lariosa v. Principi

    16 Vet. App. 323 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 17, 2002

    Brown, 9 Vet.App. 11 (1996) and Losh v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 87 (1993). … See Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1, 10 , 112 S.Ct. 2326 , 120 L.Ed.2d 1 (1992); Robinson v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 398 (1996); Latham v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 265 (1993).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Joseph C. Hillyard v. Eric K. Shinseki

    24 Vet. App. 343 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 29, 2011

    [i]s not a final decision of the Board[,]' in Canady v. … See Damrel v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 242, 245 (1992). Second, the alleged error must be "undebatable," not merely "a disagreement as to how the facts were weighed or evaluated." Russell v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Theodore L. Bissonnette, Jr. v. Anthony J. Principi

    18 Vet. App. 105 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 15, 2004

    Hence, the Board is without jurisdiction to find otherwise. R. at 6-7 (citing 38 U.S.C. § 7104 and Morris v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 260 (1991)). … Br. at 9 (citing McDowell v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 401, 405 (1993)).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Application of the Realistic Company

    440 F.2d 1393 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 13, 1971

    As appellant points out, citing Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. … Wella Corporation v. La Maur, Inc., 312 F.2d 831 , 50 CCPA 916 (1963). We find the mark CURV’ to be likewise not merely descriptive of appellant’s goods. Accordingly, the decision of the board is reversed. Reversed. .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Principi

    16 Vet. App. 261 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 23, 2002

    Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 589, 593 (1991); see also Weaver v. Principi, 14 Vet.App. 301, 302 (2001) (per curiam order); (3) under ZP v. Brown and Elcyzyn v. … Brown,6 the Board cannot be substantially 3 Holliday v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kyhn v. Shinseki

    24 Vet. App. 228 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 18, 2011

    See 38 U.S.C. § 7104 (d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert, 1 Vet.App. at 56-57 . Mr. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 218, 220 (1994) (when issue is not reasonably raised, Board is not required to “conduct an exercise in prognostication”), with Carpenter v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Karen S. McDowell v. Eric K. Shinseki

    23 Vet. App. 207 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 13, 2009

    See Owens v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 429, 433 (1995). … See Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995); Gilbert, 1 Vet.App. at 57 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Philanthropist.com, Inc. v. The General Conference Corporation of Seventh-day Adventists

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · Jun 15, 2021

    v. … Brown (“Brown Rebuttal Decl”) with exhibit attached.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.