Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFS

10,000+ results

3.13s

  • Land v. Kasemann

    162 F.2d 498 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 17, 1947

    Langevin v. Nicolson, 27 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1022, 110 F. (2d) 687, 45 USPQ 92 . … Sweetland v. Don Cole, 19 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 751, 754, 53 F. (2d) 709, 11 USPQ 174 , and authorities therein cited; King v. Young, 26 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 762, 771, 100 F. (2d) 663, 40 USPQ 176 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Balfour-Walton, A Joint Venture

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jul 18, 2017

    Brown & Ruprecht PC Kansas City, MO APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. … , Appeals of Balfour-Walton, A Joint Venture rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zimick v. West

    11 Vet. App. 45 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 29, 1998

    . § 20.3 (e); see also Grovhoug v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 209, 215 (1994). The benefit in this case would be payment for the services received at HCMC. … Secretary’s Sur-Reply Brief at 7 (citing Webb v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 122 (1994)).

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Jacqueline S. Roberts v. Robert A. McDonald

    27 Vet. App. 108 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Oct 7, 2014

    See Thurber v. … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 547, 551 (1994).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Larry E. Leonard v. Anthony J. Principi

    17 Vet. App. 447 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Feb 20, 2004

    See Flash v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 332, 340 (1995) ("[W]hen a claim to reopen is successful and the benefit sought is awarded upon readjudication, the effective date is the date of the claim to reopen."); see also Sears v. … See Sabonis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 426, 429-30 (1994) (where law and not evidence is dispositive, claim should be denied or appeal terminated because of lack of legal merit or lack of entitlement under law).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Smuck v. United States

    5 Cl. Ct. 94 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1984

    In Brown v. … Brown v. United States, supra; see also James E. Brown v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 1, 7, n. 10 (1984); United States v. Greathouse, 166 U.S. 601 , 17 S.Ct. 701 , 41 L.Ed. 1130 (1897); Faw v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Toney v. United States

    43 Fed. Cl. 389 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 9, 1999

    But in Lipp v. … Here, board review was permissive rather than mandatory, see File v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lizzie K. Mayfield v. R. James Nicholson

    20 Vet. App. 537 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 21, 2006

    Dec. at 8; R. at 155-56; see also Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 535 (1993) (en banc) (questions of fact reviewed under the "clearly erroneous" standard set forth in 38 U.S.C. § 7261(a)(4)). C. … She further argues that no such direction is provided in the statutory provisions governing the Board. See Russello v.

    Cited 99 timesPublished
  • Pedro P. Duenas v. Anthony J. Principi

    18 Vet. App. 512 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Dec 15, 2004

    . *516 Morton, 12 Vet.App. 477, 486 (1999); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 505-06 (1995), aff'd, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed.Cir.1996) (table). … See 38 U.S.C. §§ 5103A(d), 7104(d)(1); Allday v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); 38 C.F.R. § 3.159 (c)(4).

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Correia v. McDonald

    28 Vet. App. 158 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 5, 2016

    “[I]f the meaning of the regulation is clear from its language, then that is ‘the end of the matter.’ ” Tropf v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 317, 320 (2006) (quoting Brown v. … . § 4.59 ; see Mitchell v. Shinseki, 25 Vet.App. 32, 44 (2011); DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202, 206-07 (1995).

    Cited 141 timesPublished
  • Glenfield Machine & Tool Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

    16 T.C. 27 · United States Tax Court · Jan 10, 1951

    Hill, Judge: The War Contracts Price Adjustment Board determined that Glenfield Machine and Tool Company, (Docket No. 720-R), hereinafter referred to as the first partnership, realized excessive profits during the period

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carolyn K. Holle v. Robert A. McDonald

    28 Vet. App. 112 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 10, 2016

    (quoting Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1525 (Fed. Cir. 1994))). In the decision on appeal, the Board properly articulated and applied the legal standard set forth in sections 1781(d)(1)(A) and (B). … See Taylor v. West, 11 Vet.App. 436, 440 (1998); Moffitt v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 214, 225 (1997). The Court notes that the Secretary, in appropriate cases, may provide equitable relief. See 38 U.S.C. § 503; Zimick v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • 12-29 624

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Apr 28, 2017

    ."); see Hayes v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 60, 68 (1993). … See Van Hoose v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 361 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 12-35 170

    Board of Veterans' Appeals · Nov 30, 2017

    Finding substantial compliance with the Board's remand directives, the appeal is now properly before the Board. See D'Aries v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 97, 105 (2008); see also Dyment v. West, 13 Vet. … Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465, 469-70 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. United States

    39 F.2d 753 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1930

    Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C. C. A. 6th Cir.) 38 F.(2d) 425 , paragraph 668, vol. 1,1930 P. H. Fed. Tax Service. … Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Commissioner, supra, affirming the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, is of similar import.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Aug 18, 2015

    ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 58175 … of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58175, Appeal of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Everett Emerson v. Robert A. McDonald

    28 Vet. App. 200 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 10, 2016

    Brown, 7 Vet.App. 517, 527 (1995); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 56-57 (1990). … Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 498, 506 (1995), aff'd per curiam, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (table).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown

    217 Ct. Cl. 710 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1978

    However, the cases he cites (SEC v. … Brown noted in his appeal to the Board of Appeals and Review (and claims here) that he had told the Appeals Examining Office by a letter dated March 7, 1973, that he would appeal when he received documentation on the LWOP

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Parker Oil Co. v. Commissioner

    58 T.C. 985 · United States Tax Court · Sep 21, 1972

    Brown. … Furniture & Appliance Co. v. United States, 271 F. Supp. 40 (S.D. Ohio 1967), and Portage Plastics Co. v. United States, 301 F. Supp. 684 (W.D. Wis. 1969), reversed on other grounds 470 F. 2d 308 (C.A. 1972).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • EJB Facilities Services

    Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · Jan 30, 2014

    Brown Rudnick LLP Washington, DC APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Ronald J. Borro, Esq. … Board's Charter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.